Effect of day time climatic conditions associated with different 2,4-D formulations on spray deposition and weed control

References

• Appleby, A. P.; Muller, F.; Carpy, S. Weed control. In: Agrochemicals; Muller, F., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 2000; 687–707.
   Google Scholar
• Harker, K. N.; O'Donovan, J. T. Recent weed control, weed management, and integrated weed management. Weed Technol. 2013, 27, 1–11. DOI: 10.1614/WT-D-12-00109.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troxler, S. C.; Askew, S. D.; Wilcut, J. W.; Smith, W. D.; Paulsgrove, M. D. Clomazone, fomesafen, and bromoxynil systems for bromoxynil-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 2002, 16, 838–844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braz, G. B. P.; Jr Oliveira, R. S.; Constantin, J.; Raimondi, M. A.; Franchini, L. H. M.; Biffe, D. F.; Arantes, J. G. Z.; Takano, H. K. Seletividade de amonio-glufosinate isolado e em Mistura com pyrithiobac-sodium em algodoeiro transgênico LL. Planta Daninha. 2012, 30, 853–860. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-83582012000400020.
   Google Scholar
• Kruger, D. R.; Davis, V. M.; Weller, S. C.; Johnson, W. G. Response and survival of rosette-stage horseweed (Conyza canadensis) after exposure to 2,4-D. Weed Sci. 2008, 56, 748–752. DOI: 10.1614/WS-08-059.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. A.; McMaster, S. A.; Riechers, D. E.; Skelton, J.; Stahlman, P. W. 2,4-d past, present, and future: A review. Weed Technol. 2016, 30, 303–345. DOI: 10.1614/WT-D-15-00131.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Procópio, S. O.; Pires, F. R.; Menezes, C. C. E.; Barroso, A. L. L.; Cargnelutti Filho, A.; Pacheco, L. P.; Vieira, A. B.; Zanatta, J. F. Utilização do herbicida 2,4-d na dessecação de manejo em lavoura de Soja No Sistema de Plantio Direto. Magistra 2009, 21, 187–193.
   Google Scholar
• Takano, H. K.; Oliveira, R. S.; Jr. Constantin, J.; Biffe, D. F.; Franchini, L. H. M.; Braz, G. B. P.; Rios, F. A.; Gheno, E. A.; Gemelli, A. Efeito da adição do 2,4-d ao glyphosate para o controle de espécies de plantas daninhas de Difícil controle. Rbherbicidas. 2013, 12, 1–13. DOI: 10.7824/rbh.v12i1.207.
   Google Scholar
• Heap, I. Herbicide resistant weeds in Brazil. Weed Science, 2019. Available at http://www.weedscience.org/Summary/Country.aspx?CountryID=5 (accessed February 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Cieslik, L. F.; Vidal, R. A.; Machado, A. B.; Trezzi, M. M. Fluazifop-p-butyl efficacy as a function of application time and herbicide dose. Planta Daninha 2017, 35, e017167349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, C. L.; Nurse, R. E.; Hamill, A. S.; Sikkema, P. H. Environment and soil conditions influence pre- and postemergence herbicide efficacy in soybean. Weed Technol. 2010, 24, 234–243. DOI: 10.1614/WT-09-009.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contiero, R. L.; Biffe, D. F.; Constantin, J.; Oliveira, R. S.; Jr. Braz, G. B. P.; Lucio, F. R.; Schleier, I. I. J. J. Effects of nozzle types and 2,4-d formulations on spray deposition. J Environ Sci Health B 2016, 51, 886–888. DOI: 10.1080/03601234.2016.1241640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornarolli, D. A.; Rodrigues, B. N.; Chehata, A. N.; Valério, M. A. Influência do horário de aplicação no comportamento de atrazine e misturas aplicadas em pós-emergência na cultura do milho. Planta Daninha. 1999, 17, 119–130. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-83581999000100011.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, G. B.; Treadway, J. A.; Reeves, J. L.; Steckel, L. E. Effect of time of day of application of 2,4-d, dicamba, glufosinate, paraquat, and saflufenacil on horseweed (Conyza Canadensis) control. Weed Technol. 2017, 31, 550–556. DOI: 10.1017/wet.2017.34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, C. L.; Nurse, R. E.; Sikkema, P. H. Time of day impacts postemergence weed control in corn. Weed Technol. 2009, 23, 346–355. DOI: 10.1614/WT-08-150.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stopps, G. J.; Nurse, R. E.; Sikkema, P. H. The effect of time of day on the activity of postemergence soybean herbicides. Weed Technol. 2013, 27, 690–695. DOI: 10.1614/WT-D-13-00035.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinson, K. B.; Durgan, B. R.; Gunsolus, J. L.; Sothern, R. B. Time of day of application effect on glyphosate and glufosinate efficacy. Crop Manage. 2005, 4, 1–13. DOI: 10.1094/CM-2005-0718-02-RS.
   Google Scholar
• Palladini, L. A.; Raetano, C. G.; Velini, E. D. Choice of tracers for the evaluation of spray deposits. Sci. Agric. (Piracicaba, Braz) 2005, 62, 440–445. DOI: 10.1590/S0103-90162005000500005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negrisoli, E.; Tofoli, G. R.; Velini, E. D.; Martins, D.; Palladini, L. A. Depósitos unitários de calda de pulverização com e sem surfatante em plantas de Salvinia Molesta. Planta Daninha. 2002, 20, (51–56. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-83582002000400006.
   Google Scholar
• Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas – SBCPD. Procedimentos Para Instalação, Avaliação e Análise de Experimentos Com Herbicidas. SBCPD, Londrina: Brasil. 1995; 42 p.
   Google Scholar
• Penckowski, L. H.; Podolan, M. J.; López-Ovejero, R. F. Influência das condições climáticas no momento da aplicação de herbicidas pós-emergentes sobre a eficácia de controle de nabiça (Raphanus raphanistrum) na cultura de trigo. Planta Daninha. 2003, 21, 435–442. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-83582003000300012.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, L.; Soltani, N.; Robinson, D. E.; Nurse, R. E.; McFadden, A.; Sikkema, P. H. Canada fleabane (Conyza canadensis) control with preplant applied residual herbicides followed by 2,4-d choline/glyphosate DMA applied postemergence in corn. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2014, 94, 1231–1237. DOI: 10.4141/cjps2013-403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marenco, R. A.; Lopes, N. F. Fisiologia Vegetal: fotossíntese, Respiração, Relações Hídricas e Nutrição Mineral. UFV: Viçosa, MG, 2005; 451 p.
   Google Scholar
• Gilgen, A. K.; Feller, U. Drought stress alters solute allocation in broadleaf dock (Rumex obtusifolius). Weed Sci. 2013, 61, 104–108. DOI: 10.1614/WS-D-12-00074.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munns, R. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2002, 25, 239–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nautiyal, S.; Badola, H. K.; Pal, M.; Negi, D. S. Plant responses to water stress: changes in growth, dry matter production, stomatal frequency and leaf anatomy. Biol. Plant. 1994, 36, 91. DOI: 10.1007/BF02921275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.Y.S, L.; Motafakkerazad, R.; Hossain, M. M.; Rahman, I. M. M. Water stress in plants: Causes, effects and responses. In: Rahman, M. (Ed.). Water Stress. InTech: Croatia, 2012. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/water-stress/water-stress-inplants-causes-effects-and-responses.
   Google Scholar
• Djanaguiraman, M.; Prasad, P. V. V.; Boyle, D. L.; Schapaugh, W. T. High-temperature stress and soybean leaves: leaf anatomy and photosynthesis. Crop Science 2011, 51, 2125–2131. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2010.10.0571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, N. C.; Martins, D.; Rodella, R. A.; Costa, L. D. N. C. Deposição de gotas de pulverização e ph foliar no controle de plantas daninhas aquáticas. Scientia Agricola 2005, 62, 227–234.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, K.; Sellers, B. A.; Smeda, R. J. application time of day influences glyphosate efficacy. Weed Technol. 2007, 21, 7–13. DOI: 10.1614/WT-04-251.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cargnelutti Filho, A.; Toebe, M.; Burin, C.; Silveira, T. R.; Casarotto, G. Tamanho de amostra para estimação do coeficiente de correlação linear de pearson entre caracteres de milho. Pesq. Agropec. Bras. 2010, 45, 1363–1371. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-204X2010001200005.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, M. J. R.; Willis, J. B.; Askew, S. D. Application placement and relative humidity affects smooth crabgrass and tall fescue response to mesotrione. Weed Sci. 2010, 58, 67–72. DOI: 10.1614/WS-09-107.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainard, D. C.; Curran, W. S.; Bellinder, R. R.; Ngouajio, M.; VanGessel, M. J.; Haar, M. J.; Lanini, W. T.; Masiunas, J. B. Temperature and relative humidity affect weed response to vinegar and clove oil. Weed Technol. 2013, 27, 156–164. DOI: 10.1614/WT-D-12-00073.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Khatib, K.; Parker, R.; Fuerst, E. P. Foliar absorption and translocation of herbicides from aqueous solution and treated soil. Weed Sci. 1992, 40, 281–287. DOI: 10.1017/S0043174500057350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar