Activated sludge treatment for promoting the reuse of a synthetic produced water in irrigation

References

• Jones, E.; Van Vliet, M. T. H. Drought Impacts on River Salinity in the Southern US: implications for Water Scarcity. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 644, 844–853. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, L.; Chiarelli, D. D.; Rulli, M. C.; Dell'Angelo, J.; D'Odorico, P. Global Agricultural Economic Water Scarcity. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaaz6031 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz6031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J.; Yang, H.; Gosling, S. N.; Kummu, M.; Flörke, M.; Pfister, S.; Hanasaki, N.; Wada, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, C.; et al. Water Scarcity Assessments in the past, present and future. Earths. Future. 2017, 5, 545–559. DOI: 10.1002/2016EF000518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WWAP (United Nations World Water Assessment Programme). Economy, Jobs and Water. In The United Nations World Water Development Report 2016: Water and Jobs; UNESCO, Paris, 2016, UNESCO, 30–47. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000243938.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail, Z. Z.; Ibrahim, M. A. Desalination of Oilfield Produced Water Associated with Treatment of Domestic Wastewater and Bioelectricity Generation in Microbial Osmotic Fuel Cell. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 490, 247–255. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallek, R.; Miqueu, C.; Jacob, M.; Le Mélinaire, P.; Dicharry, C. Effect of Porous Activated Carbon Particles Soaked in Cyclopentane on CP-Hydrate Formation in Synthetic Produced Water. J. Water Process Eng. 2020, 38, 101660. DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agi, A.; Junin, R.; Yahya, A.; Gbadamosi, A.; Abbas, A. Comparative Study of Continuous and Intermittent Ultrasonic Ultrafiltration Membrane for Treatment of Synthetic Produced Water Containing Emulsion. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensification 2018, 132, 137–147. DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2018.08.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chew, N. G. P.; Zhao, S.; Loh, C. H.; Permogorov, N.; Wang, R. Surfactant Effects on Water Recovery from Produced Water via Direct-Contact Membrane Distillation. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 528, 126–134. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.01.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bader, M. S. H. (2007). Seawater versus Produced Water in Oil-Fields Water Injection Operations. Desalination 2007, 208, 159–168. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2006.05.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duraisamy, T. R.; Beni, A. H.; Henni, A. State of the Art Treatment of Produced Water. In Water Treatment; Elshorbagy, W.; Chowdhury, R. K. IntechOpen, 2013; 199–222. DOI: 10.5772/53478.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez, S.; Micó, M. M.; Arnaldos, M.; Medina, F.; Contreras, S. State of the Art of Produced Water Treatment. Chemosphere 2018, 192, 186–208. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, O. B.; Crisostomo, L. A.; Miranda, F. R.; Sousa, A. F.; Mesquita, A. L. M.; Cabral, J. E. O. Production of Ornamental Sunflower Irrigated with Oilfield Produced Water in the Brazilian Semiarid Region. PESQ. Agropec. Bras. 2017, 52, 443–454. DOI: 10.1590/s0100-204x2017000600008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemeyer, J. C.; Medici, L. O.; Correa, B.; Godoy, D.; Ribeiro, G.; Lima, S. O. F.; Santo, F. B.; Carvalho, D. F. Treated Produced Water in Irrigation: effects on Soil Fauna and Aquatic Organisms. Chemosphere 2020, 240, 124791–124798. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sappington, E. N.; Rifai, H. S. Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Treatment of Oilfield Produced Water for Reuse in Agriculture: Effect on Water Quality, Germination, and Plant Growth. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 34380–34391. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-3343-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pica, N. E.; Carlson, K.; Steiner, J. J.; Waskom, R. Produced Water Reuse for Irrigation of Non-Food Biofuel Crops: effects on Switchgrass and Rapeseed Germination, Physiology and Biomass Yield. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2017, 100, 65–76. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Costa Marques, M. R.; de Souza, P. S. A.; Rigo, M. M.; Cerqueira, A. A.; de Paiva, J. L.; Merçon, F.; Perez, D. V. Effects of Untreated and Treated Oilfield-Produced Water on Seed Germination, Seedling Development, and Biomass Production of Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2015, 22, 15985–15993. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4820-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, H.; Chen, Y.; Li, X.; Cheng, Y.; Yang, C.; Zeng, G. Influence of Salinity on Microorganisms in Activated Sludge Processes: A Review. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegr. 2017, 119, 520–527. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, D.-Q.; Zhang, Y.-J.; He, C.-S.; Yu, H.-Q. Changing Profiles of Bound Water Content and Distribution in the Activated Sludge Treatment by NaCl Addition and pH Modification. Chemosphere 2017, 186, 702–708. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia, Y.; Wen, X.; Zhang, B.; Yang, Y. Diversity and Assembly Patterns of Activated Sludge Microbial Communities: A Review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018, 36, 1038–1047. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.03.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tellez, G. T.; Nirmalakhandan, N.; Gardea-Torresdey, J. L. Performance Evaluation of an Activated Sludge System for Removing Petroleum Hydrocarbons from Oilfield Produced Water. Adv. Environ. Res. 2002, 6, 455–470. DOI: 10.1016/S1093-0191(01)00073-9.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, D. D.; Cammarota, M. C.; Santanna, G. L. Biological Treatment of oil field wastewater in a sequencing batch reactor. Environ. Technol. 2001, 22, 1125–1135. DOI: 10.1080/09593332208618203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Younker, J. M.; Walsh, M. E. Bench-Scale Investigation of an Integrated Adsorption-Coagulation-Dissolved Air Flotation Process for Produced Water Treatment. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 692–697. DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2013.11.009.
   Google Scholar
• Dudek, M.; Kancir, E.; Oye, G. (2017). Influence of the Crude Oil and Water Compositions on the Quality of Synthetic Produced Water. Energy Fuels 2017, 31, 3708–3716. DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b03297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APHA, AWWA, WEF. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 3rd ed. APHA, Washington, DC, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, J. D. Speed of Germination-Aid in Selection and Evaluation for Seedling Emergence and Vigor. Crop Sci. 1962, 2, 176–177. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1962.0011183x000200020.
   Google Scholar
• Melville, A.; Galleta, G.; Draper, A.; Ng, T. (1980) Seed Germination and Early Seedling Vigour in Progenies of Inbred Strawberry Selections. HortSci 1980, 15, 749–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salfinger, Y.; Tortorello, M. L. Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods, 3rd ed. APHA, Washington, DC, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Gunasegaran, T.; Rathinam, X.; Kasi, M.; Sathasivam, K.; Sreenivasan, S.; Subramaniam, S. Isolation and Identification of Salmonella from Curry Samples and Its Sensitivity to Commercial Antibiotics and Aqueous Extracts of Camelia sinensis (L.) and Trachyspermum Ammi (L.). Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2011, 1, 266–269. DOI: 10.1016/S2221-1691(11)60040-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CONAMA. Dispõe sobre as condições e padrões de lançamento de efluentes, complementa e altera a Resolução n° 357, de 17 de março de 2005, do Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente – CONAMA, 2011. http://www2.mma.gov.br/port/conama/legiabre.cfm?codlegi=646.
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. Development Document for Final Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Coastal Subcategory of the Oil and Gas Extraction Point Source Category. EPA Number: 821R96023. 1996. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-06/documents/o_g_coastal_dd_1996.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Piedad Díaz, M.; Grigson, S. J. W.; Peppiatt, C. J.; Burgess, J. G. Isolation and Characterization of Novel Hydrocarbon-Degrading Euryhaline Consortia from Crude Oil and Mangrove Sediments. Mar. Biotechnol. (NY) 2000, 2, 522–532. DOI: 10.1007/s101260000037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirbolooki, H.; Amirnezhad, R.; Pendashteh, A. R. Treatment of High Saline Textile Wastewater by Activated Sludge Microorganisms. J. Appl. Res. Technol. 2017, 15, 167–172. DOI: 10.1016/j.jart.2017.01.012.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, X.; Leong, K. Y.; Ng, H. Y. Anaerobic Treatment of Pharmaceutical Wastewater: A Critical Review. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 245, 1238–1244. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X.; Ma, J.; Ma, H.; Gao, D.; Sun, Y.; Guo, C. Removal of Polyacrylate in Aqueous Solution by Activated Sludge: characteristics and Mechanisms. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 178, 59–66. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aloui, F.; Khoufi, S.; Loukil, S.; Sayadi, S. Performances of an Activated Sludge Process for the Treatment of Fish Processing Saline Wastewater. Desalination 2009, 246, 389–396. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2008.03.062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesquita, D. P.; Amaral, A. L.; Ferreira, E. C.; Coelho, M. A. Study of Saline Wastewater Influence on Activated Sludge Flocs through Automated Image Analysis. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2009, 84, 554–560. DOI: 10.1002/jctb.2078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hailei, W.; Ping, L.; Ying, W.; LeI, L.; Ianming, Y. Metagenomic Insight into the Bioaugmentation Mechanism of Phanerochaete chrysosporium in an Activated Sludge System Treating Coking Wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 321, 820–829. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.09.072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, A. M.; Albertsen, M.; Vollertsen, J.; Nielsen, P. H. The Activated Sludge Ecosystem Contains a Core Community of Abundant Organisms. ISME J. 2016, 10, 11–20. DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2015.117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie, M.; Nie, H.; He, M.; Lin, Y.; Wang, L.; Jin, P.; Zhang, S. Immobilization of Biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa NY3 and Their Application in the Removal of Hydrocarbons from Highly Concentrated Oil-Containing Wastewater on the Laboratory Scale. J. Environ. Manage. 2016, 173, 34–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.02.045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, D.; Ansari, M. J.; Al-Ghamdi, A.; Adgaba, N.; Khan, K. A.; Pruthi, V.; Al-Waili, N. Biosurfactant Production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa DSVP20 Isolated from Petroleum Hydrocarbon-Contaminated Soil and Its Physicochemical Characterization. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2015, 22, 17636–17643. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4937-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne W.J.; Grant, M.A. Overview of Denitrification. In Genetic Engineering of Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation and Conservation of Fixed Nitrogen; Lyons J. M., Valentine R. C., Phillips D. A., Rains D. W., Huffaker R. C., Eds. Springer, Boston, MA, 1981. 10.1007/978-1-4684-3953-3_33.
   Google Scholar
• Niu, L.; Li, Y.; Xu, L.; Wang, P.; Zhang, W.; Wang, C.; Cai, W.; Wang, L. Ignored Fungal Community in Activated Sludge Wastewater Treatment Plants: diversity and Altitudinal Characteristics. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2017, 24, 4185–4193. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-8137-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peñalva, M. A.; Arst, H. N. Jr., Regulation of Gene Expression by Ambient pH in Filamentous Fungi and Yeasts. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2002, 66, 426–446. DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.66.3.426-446.2002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, M. M.; Khiadani (Hajian), M. H.; Fatehizadeh, A.; Taheri, E. Validation of Linear and Non-Linear Kinetic Modeling of Saline Wastewater Treatment by Sequencing Batch Reactor with Adapted and Non-Adapted Consortiums. Desalination 2014, 344, 228–235. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.03.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y.; Park, H.-D.; Park, J.-H.; Zhang, F.; Chen, C.; Li, X.; Zhao, D.; Zhao, F. Effect of Different Salinity Adaptation on the Performance and Microbial Community in a Sequencing Batch Reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 216, 808–816. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.06.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassin, J. P.; Kleerebezem, R.; Muyzer, G.; Rosado, A. S.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Dezotti, M. Effect of Different Salt Adaptation Strategies on the Microbial Diversity, Activity, and Settling of Nitrifying Sludge in Sequencing Batch Reactors. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 93, 1281–1294. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-011-3428-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moussa, M. S.; Sumanasekera, D. U.; Ibrahim, S. H.; Lubberding, H. J.; Hooijmans, C. M.; Gijzen, H. J.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. Long Term Effects of Salt on Activity, Population Structure and Floc Characteristics in Enriched Bacterial Cultures of Nitrifiers. Water Res. 2006, 40, 1377–1388. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.01.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valles, J. M.; Benavides-Mendoza, A.; Valdez-Aguilar, L.; Maldonado, A. J.; Ruiz-Torres, N. Effect of the Application of Produced Water on the Growth, the Concentration of Minerals and Toxic Compounds in Tomato under Greenhouse. JEP. 2013, 04, 138–146. 10.4236/jep.2013.47A016. DOI: 10.4236/jep.2013.47A016.
   Google Scholar
• Hämälä, T.; Mattila, T. M.; Leinonen, P. H.; Kuittinen, H.; Savolainen, O. Role of Seed Germination in Adaptation and Reproductive Isolation in Arabidopsis lyrata. Mol. Ecol. 2017, 26, 3484–3496. DOI: 10.1111/mec.14135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramadan, A. A.; Abd Elhamid, E. M.; Sadak, M. S. Comparative Study for the Effect of Arginine and Sodium Nitroprusside on Sunflower Plants Grown under Salinity Stress Conditions. Bull. Natl. Res. Cent. 2019, 43, 1–12. DOI: 10.1186/s42269-019-0156-0.
   Google Scholar
• Asfi, M.; Ouzounidou, G.; Moustakas, M. (2012). Evaluation of Olive Oil Mill Wastewater Toxicity on Spinach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2012, 19, 2363–2371. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-012-0746-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widnyana, I. K.; Javandira, C. Activities Pseudomonas Spp. and Bacillus sp. to Stimulate Germination and Seedling Growth of Tomato Plants. Agal Res. Agric. Agric. Sci. Proc. 2016, 9, 419–423. DOI: 10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.158.
   Google Scholar
• Magalhães, E. R. B.; Silva, F. L.; Sousa, M. A. D. S. B.; Santos, E. S. D. Use of Different Agroindustrial Waste and Produced Water for Biosurfactant Production. Biosci. Biotech. Res. Asia 2018, 15. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/bbra/2604.
   Google Scholar