Can herbicides of different mode of action cause injury symptoms in non-herbicide-tolerant young soybean due to simulated drift?

References

• Rahman, S. U.; McCoy, E.; Raza, G.; Ali, Z.; Mansoor, S.; Amin, I. Improvement of Soybean; a Way Forward Transition from Genetic Engineering to New Plant Breeding Technologies. Mol. Biotechnol. 2023, 65, 162–180. DOI: 10.1007/s12033-022-00456-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, H.; Fang, C.; Li, Y.; Kong, F.; Liu, B. Understandings and Future Challenges in Soybean Functional Genomics and Molecular Breeding. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2023, 65, 468–495. DOI: 10.1111/jipb.13433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagano, M. C.; Miransari, M. The Importance of Soybean Production Worldwide. Abiot. Biotic Stress. Soybean Prod. 2016, 1,1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Food prices record a decrease in May|Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/brasil/noticias/detail-events/pt/c/1641211/ (accessed June 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Ray, D. K.; Mueller, N. D.; West, P. C.; Foley, J. A. Yield Trends Are Insufficient to Double Global Crop Production by 2050. PLOS One. 2013, 8, e66428. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishchenko, I.; Dashchenko, A.; Dunich, A.; Mishchenko, L. Influence of Abiotic and Biotic Factors on Productivity of Transgenic Soybean and Molecular Properties of Disease Pathogen. J. Agric. Forest. 2019, 65, 15–25.
   Google Scholar
• Nair, R. M.; Boddepalli, V. N.; Yan, M.-R.; Kumar, V.; Gill, B.; Pan, R. S.; Wang, C.; Hartman, G. L.; Silva e Souza, R.; Somta, P. Global Status of Vegetable Soybean. Plants. 2023, 12, e609. DOI: 10.3390/plants12030609.
   Google Scholar
• Brochado, M. G. d S.; Mielke, K. C.; de Paula, D. F.; Laube, A. F. S.; Alcántara-de la Cruz, R.; Gonzatto, M. P.; Mendes, K. F. Impacts of Dicamba and 2,4-D Drift on ‘Ponkan’ Mandarin Seedlings, Soil Microbiota and Amaranthus Retroflexus. J. Hazard. Mater. Adv. 2022, 6, e100084. DOI: 10.1016/j.hazadv.2022.100084.
   Google Scholar
• Paula Medeiros, B. A.; De; Silva Brochado, M. G.; Da; Paiva Ferreira, G. A.; De; Costa Lima, A.; Da; Mielke, K. C.; Mendes, K. F. Practical Knowledge of Injuries Caused by Simulated Herbicide Drift in Young Tomato Plants. Agrochemicals. 2023, 2, 150–169. DOI: 10.3390/agrochemicals2010011.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, R. T.; Albrecht, A. J. P.; Albrecht, L. P.; Lorenzetti, J. B.; Danilussi, M. T. Y.; Silva, R. M. H.; da, A. F. M.; Silva, A. A.; Barroso, M. Soybean Injury Caused by the Application of Subdoses of 2,4-D or Dicamba, in Simulated Drift. J. Environ. Sci. Health B. 2023, 58, 327–333. DOI: 10.1080/03601234.2023.2173927.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Al-Khatib, K.; Peterson, D. Soybean (Glycine max) Response to Simulated Drift from Selected Sulfonylurea Herbicides, Dicamba, Glyphosate, and Glufosinate. Weed Technol. 1999, 13, 264–270. DOI: 10.1017/S0890037X00041713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INMET: National Institute of Meteorology. Mapas. mapas.inmet.gov.br (accessed January 19, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• European Weed Research Council. Committee of Methods in Weed Research. Weed Res. 1964, 4, 1-88.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, M. L.; Prostko, E. P.; Carter, O. W. Simulated Single Drift Events of 2,4-D and Dicamba on Pecan Trees. HORTTE. 2019, 29, 360–366. DOI: 10.21273/HORTTECH04265-19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seefeldt, S. S.; Jensen, J. E.; Fuerst, E. P. Log-Logistic Analysis of Herbicide Dose-Response Relationships. Weed Technol. 1995, 9, 218–227. DOI: 10.1017/S0890037X00023253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, E. M.; Jakelaitis, A.; Zuchi, J.; Pereira, L. S.; Ventura, M. V. A.; Oliveira, G. d.; Sousa, G. d.; Silva, J. N. Simulated Drift of Dicamba and 2,4-D on Soybeans: Effects of Application Dose and Time. Biosci. J. 2020, 36, 857–864. DOI: 10.14393/BJ-v36n3a2020-47742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, D. R. O.; Da; Silva, E. D. N.; Da; Aguiar, A. C. M.; De; Novello, B. D.; Silva, Á. A. A.; Da; Basso, C. J. Drift of 2,4-D and Dicamba Applied to Soybean at Vegetative and Reproductive Growth Stage. Cienc. Rural. 2018, 48, e20180179. DOI: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20180179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leon, R. G.; Ferrell, J. A.; Brecke, B. J. Impact of Exposure to 2,4-D and Dicamba on Peanut Injury and Yield. Weed Technol. 2014, 28, 465–470. DOI: 10.1614/WT-D-13-00187.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, J. M.; Griffin, J. L. Soybean (Glycine max) and Cotton (Gossypium Hirsutum) Response to Simulated Drift of Glyphosate and Glufosinate1. Weed Technol. 2002, 16, 580–586. DOI: 10.1614/0890-037X(2002)016[0580:SGMACG]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Bruggen, A. H. C.; He, M. M.; Shin, K.; Mai, V.; Jeong, K. C.; Finckh, M. R.; Morris, J. G. Environmental and Health Effects of the Herbicide Glyphosate. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 616–617, 255–268. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao, G.-F.; Zuo, Y.; Yang, S.-G.; Yang, G.-F. Protoporphyrinogen Oxidase Inhibitor: An Ideal Target for Herbicide Discovery. Chimia. 2011, 65, 961–969. DOI: 10.2533/chimia.2011.961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aulakh, J. S.; Chahal, P. S.; Jhala, A. J. Glyphosate-Resistant Weed Control and Soybean Injury in Response to Different PPO-Inhibiting Herbicides. JAS. 2016, 8, 1–9. DOI: 10.5539/jas.v8n2p1.
   Google Scholar
• Leal, J. F. L.; Borella, J.; Santos Souza, A.; Dos; Langaro, A. C.; Moura Carneiro, R.; De; Souza da Silva, G.; De; Oliveira, F. F.; Junior, De; Souza, F. R.; De; Machado, A. F. L.; Pinho, C. d Photosystem II- and Photosystem I-Inhibitor Herbicides-Driven Changes in the Dynamics of Photosynthetic Energy Dissipation of Conyza Spp. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2023, 45, 94. DOI: 10.1007/s11738-023-03572-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeshita, V.; Mendes, K. F.; Alonso, F. G.; Tornisielo, V. L. Effect of Organic Matter on the Behavior and Control Effectiveness of Herbicides in Soil. Planta Daninha. 2019, 37, 18069681. DOI: 10.1590/s0100-83582019370100110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht, L. P.; Yokoyama, A. S.; Albrecht, A. J. P.; Kosinski, R.; Milleo, R.; Silva, A. F. M. Glufosinate and Diquat in Pre-Harvest Desiccation of Soybean at Four Phenological Stages, and Their Impact on Seed Quality. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2022, 82, 448–456. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-58392022000300448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, J. A.; Kapusta, G. Soybean (Glycine max) Tolerance to Simulated Drift of Nicosulfuron and Primisulfuron. Weed Technol. 1993, 7, 740–745. DOI: 10.1017/S0890037X00037635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, E. A.; Penner, D. Sensitivity of Selected Crops to Isoxaflutole in Soil and Irrigation Water. Weed Technol. 2005, 19, 659–663. DOI: 10.1614/WT-04-203R.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, D. O.; Miller, D. K.; Bond, J. A.; Deliberto, M. A. HPPD Inhibitor-Susceptible Soybean Growth, Yield, and Economic Return following Isoxaflutole and Mesotrione Applied Postemergence. Weed Technol. 2022, 36, 636–642. DOI: 10.1017/wet.2022.65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dexter, A. G. Herbicide Spray Drift, 1993. http://www.ag.ndsu.edu/pubs/plantsci/weeds/a657w.htm. (accessed July 2023).
   Google Scholar