Commercially available bone graft substitutes: the impact of origin and processing on graft functionality

References

• Aludden HC, Mordenfeld A, Hallman M, Dahlin C, Jensen T. 2017. Lateral ridge augmentation with bio-Oss alone or bio-Oss mixed with particulate autogenous bone graft: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 46(8):1030–1038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbez B, Libouban H. 2017. Behavior of macrophage and osteoblast cell lines in contact with the beta-TCP biomaterial (beta-tricalcium phosphate). Morphologie. 101(334):154–163.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Attia A. 2017. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of cortico-cancellous bone mix xenograft (osteobiol Gen-Os) in the treatment of human periodontal intrabony defects. Egypt Dent J. 63(4):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Avila G, Neiva R, Misch CE, Galindo-Moreno P, Benavides E, Rudek I, Wang HL. 2010. Clinical and histologic outcomes after the use of a novel allograft for maxillary sinus augmentation: a case series. Implant Dent. 19(4):330–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azi ML, Aprato A, Santi I, Kfuri M, Jr., Masse A, Joeris A. 2016. Autologous bone graft in the treatment of post-traumatic bone defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 17(1):465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellido T. 2014. Osteocyte-driven bone remodeling. Calcif Tissue Int. 94(1):25–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair HC, Larrouture QC, Li Y, Lin H, Beer-Stoltz D, Liu L, Tuan RS, Robinson LJ, Schlesinger PH, Nelson DJ. 2017. Osteoblast differentiation and bone matrix formation in vivo and in vitro. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 23(3):268–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bomback DA, Grauer JN, Lugo R, Troiano N, Patel T, Friedlaender GE. 2004. Comparison of posterolateral lumbar fusion rates of Grafton Putty and OP-1 Putty in an athymic rat model. Spine. 29(15):1612–1617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonardi JP, Pereira RDS, Boos Lima F, Faverani LP, Griza GL, Okamoto R, Hochuli-Vieira E. 2018. Prospective and randomized evaluation of ChronOS and Bio-Oss in human maxillary sinuses: histomorphometric and immunohistochemical assignment for runx 2, vascular endothelial growth factor, and osteocalcin. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 76(2):325–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bow A, Newby S, Rifkin R, Jackson BK, Matavosian A, Griffin C, King W, Alghazali K, Mhannawee A, Berryhill SB, et al. 2019. Evaluation of a polyurethane platform for delivery of nanohydroxyapatite and decellularized bone particles in a porous three-dimensional scaffold. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2(5):1815.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brecevich AT, Kiely PD, Yoon BV, Nguyen JT, Cammisa FP, Abjornson C. 2017. Efficacy comparison of Accell Evo3 and Grafton demineralized bone matrix putties against autologous bone in a rat posterolateral spine fusion model. Spine J. 17(6):855–862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drosos GI, Touzopoulos P, Ververidis A, Tilkeridis K, Kazakos K. 2015. Use of demineralized bone matrix in the extremities. World J Orthop. 6(2):269–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein NE. 2015. Preliminary documentation of the comparable efficacy of vitoss versus NanOss bioactive as bone graft expanders for posterior cervical fusion. Surg Neurol Int. 6(5):164–171.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eskan MA, Girouard M-E, Morton D, Greenwell H. 2017. The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study. Int J Implant Dent. 3(1):26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueiredo A, Coimbra P, Cabrita A, Guerra F, Figueiredo M. 2013. Comparison of a xenogeneic and an alloplastic material used in dental implants in terms of physico-chemical characteristics and in vivo inflammatory response. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 33(6):3506–3513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer KR, Stavropoulos A, Calvo-Guirado JL, Schneider D, Fickl S. 2015. Influence of local administration of pamidronate on extraction socket healing–a histomorphometric proof-of-principle pre-clinical in vivo evaluation. Clin Oral Impl Res. 26(10):1135–1142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu L, Wang Z, Dong S, Cai Y, Ni Y, Zhang T, Wang L, Zhou Y. 2017. Bilayer poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)/nano-hydroxyapatite membrane with barrier function and osteogenesis promotion for guided bone regeneration. Materials. 10(3):257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenspan DC. 2012. Physical and chemical properties of commercially available mineralized bone allograft. Carlsbad (CA): Zimmer Dental Inc.; p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Guarnieri R, DeVilliers P, Grande M, Stefanelli LV, Di Carlo S, Pompa G. 2017. Histologic evaluation of bone healing of adjacent alveolar sockets grafted with bovine- and porcine-derived bone: a comparative case report in humans. Regenerative Biomater. 4(2):125–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha S-W, Jang HL, Nam KT, Beck GR. 2015. Nano-hydroxyapatite modulates osteoblast lineage commitment by stimulation of DNA methylation and regulation of gene expression. Biomaterials. 65:32–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall DJ, Turner TM, Urban RM. 2018. Healing bone lesion defects using injectable CaSO4/CaPO4 -TCP bone graft substitute compared to cancellous allograft bone chips in a canine model. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 107(2):408–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan A, Byambaa B, Morshed M, Cheikh MI, Shakoor RA, Mustafy T, Marei HE. 2018. Advances in osteobiologic materials for bone substitutes. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 12(6):1448–1468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson BK, Bow AJ, Kannarpady G, Biris AS, Anderson DE, Dhar M, Bourdo SE. 2018. Polyurethane/nano-hydroxyapatite composite films as osteogenic platforms. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 29(12):1426–1443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James AW, LaChaud G, Shen J, Asatrian G, Nguyen V, Zhang X, Ting K, Soo C. 2016. A review of the clinical side effects of bone morphogenetic protein-2. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 22(4):284–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin YZ, Zheng GB, Lee JH. 2019. Escherichia coli BMP-2 showed comparable osteoinductivity with Chinese hamster ovary derived BMP-2 with demineralized bone matrix as carrier. Growth Factors. 37(1–2):85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadam A, Millhouse PW, Kepler CK, Radcliff KE, Fehlings MG, Janssen ME, Sasso RC, Benedict JJ, Vaccaro AR. 2016. Bone substitutes and expanders in spine surgery: a review of their fusion efficacies. Int J Spine Surg. 10:33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang J, An H, Hilibrand A, Yoon ST, Kavanagh E, Boden S. 2012. Grafton and local bone have comparable outcomes to iliac crest bone in instrumented single-level lumbar fusions. Spine. 37(12):1083–1091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter AS, Gandhoke GS, Welch WC, Arnold PM, Cheng JS, Okonkwo DO. 2016. A prospective, multi-center clinical and radiographic outcomes evaluation of ChronOS strip for lumbar spine fusion. J Clin Neurosci. 25:36–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya A, Kaya B, Aktas A, Fırat ET. 2015. Effect of rifampin in combination with allogeneic, alloplastic, and heterogenous bone grafts on bone regeneration in rat tibial bone defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Med Pathol. 27(1):20–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DM, Hong H, Lin JC, Nevins M. 2017. Evaluation of the bone-regenerating effects of two anorganic bovine bone grafts in a critical-sized alveolar ridge defect model. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 37(4):e234–e244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolerman R, Nissan J, Rahmanov M, Calvo-Guirado JL, Green NT, Tal H. 2019. Sinus augmentation analysis of the gradient of graft consolidation: a split-mouth histomorphometric study. Clin Oral Invest. 23(8):3397–3406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar M, Chopra S, Das D, Gupta M, Memoalia J, Verma G. 2018. Direct maxillary sinus floor augmentation for simultaneous dental implant placement. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 8(2):188–192.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumaran ST, Arun KV, Sudarsan S, Talwar A, Srinivasan N. 2010. Osteoblast response to commercially available demineralized bone matrices–an in-vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 21(1):3–9. DOI:10.4103/0970-9290.62796
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee DSH, Pai Y, Chang S. 2014. Physicochemical characterization of InterOss® and Bio-Oss® anorganic bovine bone grafting material for oral surgery – A comparative study. Mater Chem Phys. 146(1–2):99–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee LN, Quatela O, Bhattacharyya N. 2018. The epidemiology of autologous tissue grafting in primary and revision rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope. 129(7):1549–1553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei B, Guo B, Rambhia KJ, Ma PX. 2018. Hybrid polymer biomaterials for bone tissue regeneration. Front Med. 13(2):189–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemma S, Sboarina M, Porporato PE, Zini N, Sonveaux P, Di Pompo G, Baldini N, Avnet S. 2016. Energy metabolism in osteoclast formation and activity. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 79:168–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majidinia M, Sadeghpour A, Yousefi B. 2018. The roles of signaling pathways in bone repair and regeneration. J Cell Physiol. 233(4):2937–2948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noori A, Ashrafi SJ, Vaez-Ghaemi R, Hatamian-Zaremi A, Webster TJ. 2017. A review of fibrin and fibrin composites for bone tissue engineering. Int J Nanomedicine. 12:4937–4961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potres Z, Deshpande S, Kloeppel H, Voss K, Klineberg I. 2016. Assisted wound healing and vertical bone regeneration with simultaneous implant placement: a histologic pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 31(1):45–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pujari-Palmer S, Chen S, Rubino S, Weng H, Xia W, Engqvist H, Tang L, Ott MK. 2016. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of hydroxyapatite nanoparticle morphology on the acute inflammatory response. Biomaterials. 90:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao W, Liu R, Li Z, Luo X, Huang B, Liu Q, Chen Z, Tsoi JKH, Su YX, Cheung KMC, et al. 2018. Contribution of the in situ release of endogenous cations from xenograft bone driven by fluoride incorporation toward enhanced bone regeneration. Biomater Sci. 6(11):2951–2964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao RR, Stegemann JP. 2013. Cell-based approaches to the engineering of vascularized bone tissue. Cytotherapy. 15(11):1309–1322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy BR, Sudhakar J, Rajesh N, Sandeep V, Reddy YM, Gnana Sagar WR. 2016. Comparative clinical and radiographic evaluation of mineralized cancellous bone allograft (puros((R))) and autogenous bone in the treatment of human periodontal intraosseous defects: 6-months follow-up study. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent. 6(Suppl 3):S248–s253.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sadat-Shojai M, Khorasani M-T, Dinpanah-Khoshdargi E, Jamshidi A. 2013. Synthesis methods for nanosized hydroxyapatite with diverse structures. Acta Biomater. 9(8):7591–7621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos C, Gomes P, Duarte JA, Almeida MM, Costa ME, Fernandes MH. 2017. Development of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles loaded with folic acid to induce osteoblastic differentiation. Int J Pharm. 516(1–2):185–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuberth JM, DiDomenico LA, Mendicino RW. 2009. The utility and effectiveness of bone morphogenetic protein in foot and ankle surgery. J Foot Ankle Surg. 48(3):309–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh P, Suresh DK. 2012. Clinical evaluation of GEM 21S((R)) and a collagen membrane with a coronally advanced flap as a root coverage procedure in the treatment of gingival recession defects: A comparative study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 16(4):577–583.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sohn DS, Moon YS. 2018. Histomorphometric study of rabbit's maxillary sinus augmentation with various graft materials. Anat Cell Biol. 51(Suppl 1):S1–S12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Su FY, Pang S, Ling YTT, Shyu P, Novitskaya E, Seo K, Lambert S, Zarate K, Graeve OA, Jasiuk I, et al. 2018. Deproteinization of cortical bone: effects of different treatments. Calcif Tissue Int. 103(5):554–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh W, Christou C, Low A, Yu Y, Oliver R, Bertollo N, Schlossberg B, Lloyd W, Ahn E. 2013. Bone graft materials: a comparison of NanOss Bioactive 3d and VitOss BA in a challenging model. Orthop Proc. 95(15):359–359.
   Google Scholar
• Xie H, Cui Z, Wang L, Xia Z, Hu Y, Xian L, Li C, Xie L, Crane J, Wan M, et al. 2014. PDGF-BB secreted by preosteoclasts induces angiogenesis during coupling with osteogenesis. Nat Med. 20(11):1270–1278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu AT, Qi WT, Lin MN, Zhu YH, He FM. 2019. The optimization of sintering treatment on bovine-derived bone grafts for bone regeneration: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater. DOI:10.1002/jbm.b.34387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young CS, Ladd PA, Browning CF, Thompson A, Bonomo J, Shockley K, Hart CE. 2009. Release, biological potency, and biochemical integrity of recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB (rhPDGF-BB) combined with Augment(TM) Bone Graft or GEM 21S beta-tricalcium phosphate (beta-TCP). J Control Release. 140(3):250–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao R, Xie P, Zhang K, Tang Z, Chen X, Zhu X, Fan Y, Yang X, Zhang X. 2017. Selective effect of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on osteoporotic and healthy bone formation correlates with intracellular calcium homeostasis regulation. Acta Biomater. 59:338–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Zhang K, Zhao R, Ye X, Chen X, Xiao Z, Yang X, Zhu X, Zhang K, Fan Y, et al. 2017. Bone regeneration with micro/nano hybrid-structured biphasic calcium phosphate bioceramics at segmental bone defect and the induced immunoregulation of MSCs. Biomaterials. 147:133–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar