Disability, Bioethics, and Rejected Knowledge

REFERENCES

• Abberley , P. 1987 . The concept of oppression and the development of a social theory of disability . Disability, Handicap & Society , 2 ( 1 ) : 5 – 20 . [INFOTRIEVE] [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Anon . 1996 . Bob Dent’s Letter . The Mercury , 71 September 27 [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Asch , A. 1998 . Distracted by disability . Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , 7 ( 1 ) : 77 – 88 . [INFOTRIEVE] [CSA] [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asch , A. 2001 . “ Disability, bioethics, and human rights ” . In Handbook of Disability Studies , Edited by: Albrecht , G. L. , Seelman , K. D. and Bury , M. 297 – 325 . Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan , A. , Brock , D. , Daniels , N. and Wikler , A. 2000 . From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice , New York : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Cook, M. (2002). ‘Designer babies? Don’t leave it to bureaucrats to decide,’ The Age, April 23
   Google Scholar
• Davis , A. 1985 . Yes, the baby should live . New Scientist , 54 October 31 [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Davis , A. 1989 . From Where I Sit , London : Triangle .
   Google Scholar
• Disabled Peoples’ International Europe. (2000). The right to live and be different, declaration at Solihull, United Kingdom, 12–13 February 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.independentliving.org/docs1/dpi022000.html> (Accessed: 2 February 2004 ).
   Google Scholar
• Drake, S & Johnson, M. (2005, February 12). Movies about disabled keep myths alive, Sun Times [Online]. Available: http://www.suntimes.com/output/otherviews/cst-edt-ref12.html (Accessed: 14 February 2005 ).
   Google Scholar
• Fulcher , G. 1989 . Disabling Policies? , London : Falmer Press .
   Google Scholar
• Goggin , G. and Newell , C. 1997 . Residential consumers & ‘rejected knowledge’: Exploring and acknowledging the margins in broadband services in Australia . Telecommunications Policy , 21 ( 4 ) : 317 – 328 . [CSA] [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goggin , G. and Newell , C. 2004 . Uniting the nation?: Disability, stem cells, and the Australian media . Disability & Society , 19 ( 1 ) : 47 – 60 . [INFOTRIEVE] [CSA] [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goggin , G. and Newell , C. 2005 . Disability in Australia—Exposing a Social Apartheid , Sydney : UNSW Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hockenberry , J. 1996 . Declarations of Independence: War Zones and Wheelchairs , London : Penguin .
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. (2002, September 21). ‘Designer baby go ahead,’ Herald Sun [Online]. Available: http://news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,5139595%255E2,00.html (Accessed: 22 September 2002 ).
   Google Scholar
• Komesaroff , L. 2003 . Deaf education and underlying structures of power in communication . Australian Journal of Communication , 30 ( 3 ) : 43 – 59 . [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Kuczewski , M.G. 2001 . Disability: An agenda for bioethics . American Journal of Bioethics , 1 ( 3 ) : 36 – 44 . [INFOTRIEVE] [CSA] [CROSSREF]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lane , H. 1984 . When the Mind Hears: A History of the Deaf , New York : Vintage .
   Google Scholar
• McNeill , P. M. 2002 . Ethics committees in Australia and New Zealand: A critique . Politeia , 67 : 113 – 119 . [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Newell , C. 1996 . Critical reflections on euthanasia and people with disability . Australian Quarterly , 68 ( 3 ) : 48 – 56 . [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Newell , C. 1999a . “ Critical reflections on disability, difference and genetic testing ” . In Goodbye Normal Gene , Edited by: O’sullivan , G. , Sharman , E. and Short , S . 58 – 71 . Sydney : Pluto Press .
   Google Scholar
• Newell , C. 1999b . The social nature of disability, disease and genetics . Journal of Medical Ethics , 25 ( 2 ) : 172 – 175 . [PUBMED] [INFOTRIEVE] [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver , M. 1996 . Understanding Disability from Theory to Practice , Houndmills : MacMillan Press .
   Google Scholar
• Parens, E. & Asch, A. (1999). ‘The disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing: Reflections and recommendations,’ Hastings Center Report, Sept.–Oct, Special Supplement, S1–S22.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons , I. 1999 . Cripples, Coons, Fags and Fems: A Look at How Four Human Rights Movements Have Fought Prejudice , Geelong : Villamanta Legal Service .
   Google Scholar
• Richards , E. 1991 . Vitamin C and Cancer , London : MacMillan .
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare , T. 1995 . Back to the future? New genetics and disabled people . Critical Social Policy , 44/45 ( Autumn ) : 22 – 35 . [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare , T. 1998 . Choices and rights: Eugenics, genetics and disability equality . Disability & Society , 13 ( 5 ) : 665 – 681 . [INFOTRIEVE] [CSA] [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare , T. 1999 . Manifesto for genetic justice . Social Alternatives , 18 ( 1 ) : 29 – 32 . [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Singer , P. and Kuhse , H. 1985 . Should the Baby Live?: The Problem of Handicapped Infants , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Wallis , R , ed. 1979 . On the Margins of Science: The Social Construction of Rejected Knowledge , Keele, Staffordshire : University of Keele .
   Google Scholar
• Warnock , M. 1999 . The politicisation of medical ethics . Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London , 33 ( 5 ) : 474 – 478 . [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wertz , D.C. 2000 . “ Drawing lines: Notes for policymakers ” . In Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights , Edited by: Parens , E. and Asche , A. 261 – 287 . Washington, DC : Georgetown University Press .
   Google Scholar