Comparison of Congress Mash with Final 65 °C Mash for Wort Production with Unmalted Barley, Tritordeum, and Quinoa, with or without Pregelatinization and/or Enzyme Addition

Literature cited

• Bogdan, P.; Kordialik-Bogacka, E. Alternatives to Malt in Brewing. Trend. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 65, 1–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2017.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kordialik-Bogacka, E.; Bogdan, P.; Diowksz, A. Malted and Unmalted Oats in Brewing. J. Inst. Brew. 2014, 120, 390–398. DOI: 10.1002/jib.178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koszyk, P.; Lewis, M. Unmalted Grains as Maltsters’ Adjuvant and Brewers’ Adjunct. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 1977, 35, 77–81. DOI: 10.1094/ASBCJ-35-0077.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, E.; Auer, A.; Becker, T.; Gastl, M. Comparison of Beer Quality Attributes between Beers Brewed with 100% Barley Malt and 100% Barley Raw Material. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2012, 92, 803–813. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.4651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saison, D.; De Schutter, D. P.; Uyttenhove, B.; Delvaux, F.; Delvaux, F. R. Contribution of Staling Compounds to the Aged Flavour of Lager Beer by Studying Their Flavour Thresholds. Food Chem. 2009, 114, 1206–1215. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.10.078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunz, T.; Müller, C.; Mato-Gonzales, D.; Methner, F. J. The Influence of Unmalted Barley on the Oxidative Stability of Wort and Beer. J. Inst. Brew. 2012, 118, 32–39. DOI: 10.1002/jib.6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poreda, A.; Czarnik, A.; Zdaniewicz, M.; Jakubowski, M.; Antkiewicz, P. Corn Grist Adjunct–Application and Influence on the Brewing Process and Beer Quality. J. Inst. Brew. 2014, 120, 77–81. DOI: 10.1002/jib.115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnitzenbaumer, B.; Karl, C. A.; Arendt, E. K. A Comparison of White Nigerian and Red Italian Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) as Brewing Adjuncts Based on Optimized Enzyme Additions. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2013, 71, 248–257. DOI: 10.1094/ASBCJ-2013-1011-01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baert, J.; De Clippeleer, J. J.; Jaskula-Goiris, B.; Van Opstaele, F.; De Rouck, G.; Aerts, G.; De Cooman, L. Further Elucidation of Beer Flavor Instability: The Potential Role of Cysteine-Bound Aldehydes. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2015, 73, 243–252. DOI: 10.1094/ASBCJ-2015-0531-01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterczyńska, M.; Stachnik, M.; Poreda, A.; Pużyńska, K.; Piepiórka-Stepuk, J.; Fiutak, G.; Jakubowski, M. Ionic Composition of Beer Worts Produced with Selected Unmalted Grains. LWT. 2021, 137, 110348. /02/01/2021, DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platel, K.; Eipeson, S. W.; Srinivasan, K. Bioaccessible Mineral Content of Malted Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana), Wheat (Triticum aestivum), and Barley (Hordeum vulgare). (in Eng). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 8100–8103. DOI: 10.1021/jf100846e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunz, T.; Strähmel, A.; Cortés, N.; Hense, W.; Kroh, L.; Methner, F. Pro-and Antioxidative Effects of the Maillard Reaction Products in Malt on the Oxidative Beer Stability. In ASBC Annual Meeting, Brewing Summit, Poster 65, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Zdaniewicz, M.; Pater, A.; Hrabia, O.; Duliński, R.; Cioch-Skoneczny, M. Tritordeum Malt: An Innovative Raw Material for Beer Production. J. Cereal. Sci. 2020, 96, 103095. Art DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2020.103095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.; Kordialik, -Bogacka, P.; Bogdan, K.; Pielech-Przybylska, D. Michałowska, Suitability of Unmalted Quinoa for Beer Production. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 5027–5036. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.9037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarnkow, M.; Geyer, T.; Lindemann, B.; Burberg, F.; Back, W.; Arendt, E. K.; Kreisz, S. The Use Response Surface Methodology to Optimise Malting Conditions of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa L.) as a Raw Material for Gluten Free Foods and Beverages. Brewing Sci. 2007, 60, 118–126.
   Google Scholar
• James, L. E. A. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): Composition, Chemistry, Nutritional, and Functional Properties. Adv. Food Nutri. Res. 2009, 58, 1–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• González Martín, M. I.; Wells Moncada, G.; Fischer, S.; Escuredo, O. Chemical Characteristics and Mineral Composition of Quinoa by near-Infrared Spectroscopy. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014, 94, 876–881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jancurová, M.; Minarovičová, L.; Dandar, A. Quinoa–a Review. Czech J. Food Sci. 2009, 27, 71–79. DOI: 10.17221/32/2008-CJFS.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meussdoerffer, F.; Zarnkow, M. Starchy Raw Materials. In Handbook of Brewing; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.: Weinheim, 2009; 43–83. [Online]. DOI: 10.1002/9783527623488.ch2.
   Google Scholar
• Belitz, H.-D.; Grosch, W.; Schieberle, P. Carbohydrates. Food Chem. 2008, 248–339.
   Google Scholar
• Hrušková, M.; Švec, I.; Jurinová, I. Quality Evaluation of the Selected Tritordeum Lines. Sci. Agric. Bohemica. 2010, 41, 49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, F.; Li, H. Modification of Quinoa Flour Functionality Using Ultrasound. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2019, 52, 305–310. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.11.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, K. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) Starch—Physico-Chemical Properties and Functional Characteristics. Starch/Stärke. 1990, 42, 81–86. DOI: 10.1002/star.19900420302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, J.; Kuhn, M. Characterization of Amaranthus cruentus and Chenopodium quinoa Starch. Starch/Stärke. 1999, 51, 116–120. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-379X(199904)51:4<116::AID-STAR116>3.0.CO;2-R.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarnkow, M.; Keßler, M.; Burberg, F.; Back, W.; Arendt, E. K.; Kreisz, S. The Use of Response Surface Methodology to Optimise Malting Conditions of Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) as a Raw Material for Gluten-Free Foods. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 2007, 113, 280–292. DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.2007.tb00288.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goode, D. L.; Halbert, C.; Arendt, E. K. Mashing Studies with Unmalted Sorghum and Malted Barley. J. Inst. Brew. 2002, 108, 465–473. DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.2002.tb00577.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok, Y. J.; Ye, L.; Muller, J.; Ow, D. S.-W.; Bi, X. Brewing with Malted Barley or Raw Barley: what Makes the Difference in the Processes? Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 1059–1067. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-018-9537-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, M. R. Malt Attenuation—An Australian Brewer’s Perspective. In Proceedings of the 13th Australian Barley Technical Symposium, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Moll, M.; Flayeux, R. New Mashing System for Determination of Laboratory Extract. J. Inst. Brew. 1981, 87, 345–348. DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1981.tb04047.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, M.; Flayeux, R. Comparison of Different Malt Analyses. J. Inst. Brew. 1986, 92, 572–583. DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1986.tb04456.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, P. B.; Li, Y.; Barr, J.; Horsley, R. D. Effect of Operational Parameters on the Determination of Laboratory Extract and Associated Wort Quality Factors. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2007, 65, 219–228. DOI: 10.1094/ASBCJ-2007-0824-01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenholm, K.; Home, S.; Pietila, K.; Jaakkola, N.; Leino, E. Are the Days of Congress Mashing Over? In Proceedings of the Barley, Malt and Wort Symposium, The Institute of Brewing, Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe, 1996; pp 149–163.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D. E.; Goldsmith, M.; Dambergs, R.; Nischwitz, R. A Comprehensive Revaluation of Small-Scale Congress Mash Protocol Parameters for Determining Extract and Fermentability. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2011, 69, 13–27. DOI: 10.1094/ASBCJ-2011-0111-01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellemans, T. Outline of Four Degrees of Diversification for Understanding Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Quality. Doctoral dissertation, Ghent University, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• European Brewery Convention, Analytica-EBC. Nurnberg, Germany: Verlag Hans Carl Getranke Fachverlag, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Holtekjølen, A. K.; Uhlen, A. K.; Bråthen, E.; Sahlstrøm, S.; Knutsen, S. H. Contents of Starch and Non-Starch Polysaccharides in Barley Varieties of Different Origin. Food Chem. 2006, 94, 348–358. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.11.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlandsson, A. 2010. Tritordeum: Evaluation of a New Food Cereal. Dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Contreras-Jiménez, B.; Torres-Vargas, O. L.; Rodríguez-García, M. E. Physicochemical Characterization of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) Flour and Isolated Starch. Food Chem. 2019, 298, 124982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martı́n, A.; Alvarez, J. B.; Martín, L. M.; Barro, F.; Ballesteros, J. The Development of Tritordeum: A Novel Cereal for Food Processing. J. Cereal Sci. 1999, 30, 85–95. DOI: 10.1006/jcrs.1998.0235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, S.; Yu, G.; Chen, X.; Huang, Y.; Jiang, X.; Zhang, G.; Jin, X. Grain Protein Content Variation and Its Association Analysis in Barley. BMC Plant Biol. 2013, 13, 35. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osman, A.; Coverdale, S. M.; Ferguson, R.; Watson, K.; Fox, G.; Hamilton, S. E.; de Jersey, J. What Causes Low Barley Protein Modification and Low Wort Free Amino Nitrogen–Proteins or Proteinases? In Proceedings of the 10th Australian Barley Technical Symp 2001, 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D. E.; Collins, H.; Eglinton, J.; Wilhelmson, A. Assessing the Impact of the Level of Diastatic Power Enzymes and Their Thermostability on the Hydrolysis of Starch during Wort Production to Predict Malt Fermentability. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2005, 63, 185–198. DOI: 10.1094/ASBCJ-63-0185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georg-Kraemer, J. E.; Mundstock, E. C.; Cavalli-Molina, S. Developmental Expression of Amylases during Barley Malting. J. Cereal Sci. 2001, 33, 279–288. DOI: 10.1006/jcrs.2001.0367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, J.; Clapperton, J.; Divers, D.; Rennie, H. Factors Affecting Wort Separation. J. Inst. Brew. 1973, 79, 407–413. DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1973.tb03558.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malomo, O.; Adebanjo Benjamin Ogunmoyela, O.; Oluwajoba, S. O.; Olumuyiwa Adekoyeni, O. Effect of Enzymes on the Quality of Beer/Wort Developed from Proportions of Sorghum Adjuncts. Aim. 2012, 2, 447–451. DOI: 10.4236/aim.2012.24057.
   Google Scholar
• Schnitzenbaumer, B.; Kaspar, J.; Titze, J.; Arendt, E. K. Implementation of Commercial Oat and Sorghum Flours in Brewing. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2014, 238, 515–525. DOI: 10.1007/s00217-013-2129-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osman, A. M.; Coverdale, S. M.; Cole, N.; Hamilton, S. E.; Jersey, J.; Inkerman, P. A. Characterisation and Assessment of the Role of Barley Malt Endoproteases during Malting and Mashing 1. J. Inst. Brew. 2002, 108, 62–67. DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.2002.tb00125.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zastrow, C.; Hollatz, C.; Araujo, P. D.; Stambuk, B. Maltotriose Fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 27, 34–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, X.; D’Amore, T.; Russell, I.; Stewart, G. G. Factors Influencing Maltotriose Utilization during Brewery Wort Fermentations. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 1994, 52, 41–47. DOI: 10.1094/ASBCJ-52-0041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narziss, L.; Back, W. Technologie Der Malzbereitung. In Die Bierbrauerei. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2012; pp 800–802
   Google Scholar
• Deželak, M.; Zarnkow, M.; Becker, T.; Košir, I. J. Processing of Bottom-Fermented Gluten-Free Beer-like Beverages Based on Buckwheat and Quinoa Malt with Chemical and Sensory Characterization. J. Inst. Brew. 2014, 120, 360–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, S. H.; Henson, C. A. Tracking the Progress of Wort Sugar Production during Congress Mashing with North American Barley Cultivars and Comparisons to Wort Osmolyte Concentrations and Malt Extract. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2011, 69, 200–213. DOI: 10.1094/ASBCJ-2011-0829-01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentice, N. Invertase of Germinated Barley. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1972, 20, 764–768. DOI: 10.1021/jf60182a008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckow, R.; Weiss, U.; Heinz, V.; Knorr, D. Stability and Catalytic Activity of α-Amylase from Barley Malt at Different Pressure–Temperature Conditions. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2007, 97, 1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, R. The Effects of Mashing Temperature and Mash Thickness on Wort Carbohydrate Composition. J. Inst. Brew. 1991, 97, 85–92. DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1991.tb01055.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, Y. L.; Speers, A.; Paulson, A. T.; Stewart, R. J. Effects of β-Glucans and Environmental Factors on the Viscosities of Wort and Beer. J. Inst. Brew. 2004, 110, 104–116. DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.2004.tb00189.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Home, S.; Pietilä, K.; Sjoholm, K. Control of Glucanolysis in Mashing. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 1993, 51, 108–113. DOI: 10.1094/ASBCJ-51-0108.
   Google Scholar
• Home, S.; Stenholm, K.; Wilhelmson, A.; Autio, K. Properties of Starch and Cell Wall Components and Their Effects on Processing. in 9th Australian Barley Technical Symposium, Melbourne, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Einsiedler, F.; Schwill-Miedaner, A.; Sommer, K.; Hämäläinen, J. Experimentelle Untersuchungen Und Modellierung Komplexer Biochemischer Und Technologischer Prozesse Am Beispiel Des Maischens. Teil 3: Cytolyse. Monatssch. Für Brauwissenschaft. 1998, 51, 11–21.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D. E.; Goldsmith, M.; Redd, K. S.; Nischwitz, R.; Lentini, A. Impact of Mashing Conditions on Extract, Its Fermentability, and the Levels of Wort Free Amino Nitrogen (FAN), β-Glucan, and Lipids. Cerevisia 2013, 38, 52–107. DOI: 10.1016/j.cervis.2013.09.006.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, Y. L.; Speers, A.; Paulson, A. T.; Stewart, R. J. Barley β-Glucans and Their Degradation during Malting and Brewing. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Ass. Am. 2004, 41, 231–240.
   Google Scholar
• Ng’andwe, C. C.; Hall, A. N.; Taylor, J. R. Proteolysis of Sorghum Endosperm Proteins When Mashing with Raw Grain plus Exogenous Protease and Potassium Metabisulphite. J. Inst. Brew. 2008, 114, 343–348. DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.2008.tb00778.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgeti, D.; Nordlohne, S. D.; Föste, M.; Besl, M.; Linden, M. H.; Heinz, V.; Jekle, M.; Becker, T. Volume and Texture Improvement of Gluten-Free Bread Using Quinoa White Flour. J. Cereal Sci. 2014, 59, 41–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2013.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishio, S.; Aoyagi, Y. Cultivar- and Region-Specific Differences in the Starch-Degrading Enzymes Produced during Rice Soaking. J. Jap. Soc. Food. Sci. Technol. 2014, 61, 232–243. DOI: 10.3136/nskkk.61.232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prego, I.; Maldonado, S.; Otegui, M. Seed Structure and Localization of Reserves in Chenopodium quinoa. Ann. Botan. 1998, 82, 481–488. DOI: 10.1006/anbo.1998.0704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar