2,796
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Exploring the Regional Identity of Cascade and Mosaic® Hops Grown at Different Locations in Oregon and Washington

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 480-492 | Received 02 May 2022, Accepted 09 Jun 2022, Published online: 13 Jul 2022

Literature cited

  • Hahn, C. D.; Lafontaine, S. R.; Pereira, C. B.; Shellhammer, T. H. Evaluation of Nonvolatile Chemistry Affecting Sensory Bitterness Intensity of Highly Hopped Beers. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 3505–3513. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b05784.
  • Rettberg, N.; Biendl, M.; Garbe, L.-A. Hop Aroma and Hoppy Beer Flavor: chemical Backgrounds and Analytical Tools: A Review. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2018, 76, 1–20. DOI: 10.1080/03610470.2017.1402574.
  • Lafontaine, S. R.; Pereira, C. B.; Vollmer, D. M.; Shellhammer, T. H. The Effectiveness of Hop Volatile Markers for Forecasting Dry-Hop Aroma Intensity and Quality of Cascade and Centennial Hops. Brewing Sci. 2018, 71, 116–140.
  • Lafontaine, S. R.; Shellhammer, T. H. Investigating the Factors Impacting Aroma, Flavor, and Stability in Dry-Hopped Beers. Tech. Quart. Master Brew. Ass. Am. 2019, 56, 13–23.
  • Dobis, E. A.; Reid, N.; Schmidt, C.; Goetz, A. J. The Role of Craft Breweries in Expanding (Local) Hop Production. J. Wine Econ. 2019, 14, 374–382. DOI: 10.1017/jwe.2019.17.
  • Shahbandeh, M. Global Share Hop Production 2020, by Major Producer 3/22/2021, 2021.
  • Georgensgmuend, H. M. Barth Haas Report Hops 2019/2020. Joh. Barth & Sohn GmbH & Co KG.: Nuremberg, Germany, 2020.
  • Barry, S.; Muggah, E. M.; McSweeney, M. B.; Walker, S. A Preliminary Investigation into Differences in Hops’ Aroma Attributes. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 53, 804–811. DOI: 10.1111/ijfs.13656.
  • Forster, A.; Gahr, A. A Comparison of the Analytical and Brewing Characteristics of Cascade and Comet Hop Varieties as Grown in Yakima (USA) and Hallertau (Germany). Brew. Sci. 2014, 67, 137–148.
  • Rodolfi, M.; Chiancone, B.; Liberatore, C. M.; Fabbri, A.; Cirlini, M.; Ganino, T. Changes in Chemical Profile of Cascade Hop Cones according to the Growing Area. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 6011–6019. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.9876.
  • Kishimoto, T.; Kobayashi, M.; Yako, N.; Ida, A.; Wanikawa, A. Comparison of 4-Mercapto-4-Methylpentan-2-One Contents in Hop Cultivars from Different Growing Regions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 1051–1057. DOI: 10.1021/jf072173e.
  • Morcol, T. B.; Negrin, A.; Matthews, P. D.; Kennelly, E. J. ( Humulus lupulus L.) Terroir Has Large Effect on a Glycosylated Green Leaf Volatile but Not on Other Aroma Glycosides. Food Chem. 2020, 321, 126644–126651. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126644.
  • Pepi, S.; Chicca, M.; Telloli, C.; Roma, A. D.; Grisenti, P.; Tessari, U.; Vaccaro, C. Discrimination of Geographical Origin of Hop (Humulus lupulus L.) Using Geochemical Elements Combined with Statistical Analysis. Environ. Geochem. Health 2019, 41, 1559–1576. DOI: 10.1007/s10653-018-0232-7.
  • Van Holle, A.; Landschoot, A. V.; Roldán-Ruiz, I.; Naudts, D.; Keukeleire, D. D. The Brewing Value of Amarillo Hops (Humulus lupulus L.) Grown in Northwestern USA: A Preliminary Study of Terroir Significance. J. Inst. Brew. 2017, 123, 312–318. DOI: 10.1002/jib.433.
  • Verhoeven, E.; Coleman, L.; Weaver, G.; Townsend, S.; Gallagher, A.; Shellhammer, T. H. First Steps toward Understanding the Regional Identity of Hops Grown in the Willamette Valley, Oregon. Tech. Quart. Master Brew. Ass. Am. 2019, 56, 141–148.
  • Van Simaeys, K. R.; Fechir, M.; Gallagher, A.; Stokholm, A.; Weaver, G.; Shellhammer, T. H. Examining Chemical and Sensory Differences of New American Aroma Hops Grown in the Willamette Valley, Oregon. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2021, 1–9. DOI: 10.1080/03610470.2021.1968271.
  • Tomasino, E.; Harrison, R.; Sedcole, R.; Frost, A. Regional Differentiation of New Zealand Pinot Noir Wine by Wine Professionals Using Canonical Variate Analysis. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2013, 64, 357–363. DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2013.12126.
  • Vaudour, E. The Quality of Grapes and Wine in Relation to Geography: Notions of Terroir at Various Scales. J. Wine Rec. 2002, 13, 117–141. DOI: 10.1080/0957126022000017981.
  • Teuber, R. Geographical Indications of Origin as a Tool of Product Differentiation: The Case of Coffee. Center for International Development and Environmental Research, Justus-Liebig-University: Giessen, Germany, 2007.
  • Mudge, E. M.; Brown, P. N.; Murch, S. J. The Terroir of Cannabis: Terpene Metabolomics as a Tool to Understand Cannabis sativa Selections. Planta Med. 2019, 85, 781–796.
  • Schüßler, L. Protecting ‘Single-Origin Coffee’ within the Global Coffee Market: The Role of Geographical Indications and Trademarks. J. Int. Trade Law Policy 2009, 10, 149–185.
  • Vaudour, E.; Costantini, E.; Jones, G. V.; Mocali, S. An Overview of the Recent Approaches to Terroir Functional Modelling, Footprinting and Zoning. Soil 2015, 1, 287–312. DOI: 10.5194/soil-1-287-2015.
  • Van Leeuwen, C.; Friant, P.; Choné, X.; Tregoat, O.; Koundouras, S.; Dubourdieu, D. Influence of Climate, Soil, and Cultivar on Terroir. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2004, 55, 207–217.
  • Atallah, S. S.; Bazzani, C.; Ha, K. A.; Nayga, R. M. Does the Origin of Inputs and Processing Matter? Evidence from Consumers’ Valuation for Craft Beer. Food Qual. Prefer 2021, 89, 104146–104155. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104146.
  • Staples, A. J.; Malone, T.; Sirrine, J. R. Hopping on the Localness Craze: What Brewers Want from State-Grown Hops. Manage. Decis. Econ. 2021, 42, 463–473. DOI: 10.1002/mde.3246.
  • George, A. 2020 Statistical Report. Hop Growers of America: Yakima, WA, 2021
  • Henning, J. A.; Coggins, J.; Peterson, M. Simple SNP-Based Minimal Marker Genotyping for Humulus lupulus L. Identification and Variety Validation. BMC Res. Note. 2015, 8, 1–12.
  • ASBC methods of analysis. Hops Method 4. Moisture. Approved 1958, rev. 1976, 2008– American Society of Brewing Chemists, St. Paul, MN, 2008.
  • Rubottom, L. N.; Lafontaine, S. R.; Hauser, D. G.; Pereira, C.; Shellhammer, T. H. Hop Kilning Temperature Sensitivity of Dextrin-Reducing Enzymes in Hops. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2022, 80, 75–83. DOI: 10.1080/03610470.2021.1903290.
  • ASBC Methods of Analysis. Hops Method 17. Hop Essential Oils by Gas Chromatigraphy-Flame Ionization Detection. 2004. American Society of Brewing Chemists, St. Paul, MN, 2004.
  • ASBC Methods of Analysis. Hops Method 14. α-Acids and β-Acids in Hops and Hop Extracts by HPLC. Approved 1970, rev. 1976, 1989, 2008. American Society of Brewing Chemists, St. Paul, MN, 2008.
  • ASBC Methods of Analysis. Hops Method 12. Hop Storage Index (HIS). Approved 1979, rev. 1981. American Society of Brewing Chemists, St. Paul, MN, 2008.
  • ASBC Methods of Analysis. Hops Method 12. Total Essential Oils in Hops and Hop Pellets by Steam Distillation. Approved 1988, rev. 2008. American Society of Brewing Chemists, St. Paul, MN, 2008.
  • Dehlholm, C.; Brockhoff, P. B.; Meinert, L.; Aaslyng, M. D.; Bredie, W. L. Rapid Descriptive Sensory Methods–Comparison of Free Multiple Sorting, Partial Napping, Napping, Flash Profiling and Conventional Profiling. Food Qual. Prefer. 2012, 26, 267–277. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.02.012.
  • Varela, P.; Ares, G. Sensory Profiling, the Blurred Line between Sensory and Consumer Science. A Review of Novel Methods for Product Characterization. Food Res. Int. 2012, 48, 893–908. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2012.06.037.
  • Ares, G.; Antúnez, L.; Giménez, A.; Roigard, C. M.; Pineau, B.; Hunter, D. C.; Jaeger, S. R. Further Investigations into the Reproducibility of Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) Questions for Sensory Product Characterization Elicited by Consumers. Food Qual. Prefer 2014, 36, 111–121. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.03.010.
  • Wickham, H. Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer: New York, 2016.
  • Sharp, D. C.; Townsend, M. S.; Qian, Y. Effect of Harvest Maturity on the Chemical Composition of Cascade and Willamette Hops. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2014, 72, 231–238.
  • Lam, K. C.; Foster, R. T.; II.,.; Deinzer, M. L. Aging of Hops and Their Contribution to Beer Flavor. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1986, 34, 763–770. DOI: 10.1021/jf00070a043.
  • Probasco, G.; Perrault, J.; Varnum, S.; Hysert, D. Mosaic (HBC 369): A New Flavor Hop Variety. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2017, 75, 6–10.
  • Trochine, A.; González, S. B.; Burini, J. A.; Cavallini, L.; Gastaldi, B.; Reiner, G.; Sofrás, F. M. S.; Baren, CWv.; Lira, P. D. L.; Retta, D.; et al. Chemical Characterization of the Two Major Hop Varieties Produced in Patagonia (Argentina) for the Brewing Industry. Brewing Sci. 2020, 73, 95–102.
  • Vollmer, D. M.; Shellhammer, T. H. Influence of Hop Oil Content and Composition on Hop Aroma Intensity in Dry-Hopped Beer. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2016, 74, 242–249.
  • Nance, M. R.; Setzer, W. N. Volatile Components of Aroma Hops (Humulus lupulus L.) Commonly Used in Beer Brewing. J. Brew. Distill. 2011, 2, 16–22.
  • Cibaka, M.-L. K.; Ferreira, C. S.; Decourrière, L.; Lorenzo-Alonso, C.-J.; Bodart, E.; Collin, S. Dry Hopping with the Dual-Purpose Varieties Amarillo, Citra, Hallertau Blanc, Mosaic, and Sorachi Ace: Minor Contribution of Hop Terpenol Glucosides to Beer Flavors. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2017, 75, 122–129.
  • Steensels, J.; Meersman, E.; Snoek, T.; Saels, V.; Verstrepen, K. J. Large-Scale Selection and Breeding to Generate Industrial Yeasts with Superior Aroma Production. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 6965–6975.
  • Pires, E. J.; Teixeira, J. A.; Brányik, T.; Vicente, A. A. Yeast: The Soul of Beer’s Aroma: A Review of Flavour-Active Esters and Higher Alcohols Produced by the Brewing Yeast. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 1937–1949. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-013-5470-0.
  • Schieberle, P. Primary Odorants of Pale Lager Beer. Z. Lebensm Unters Forch. 1991, 193, 558–565. DOI: 10.1007/BF01190873.
  • Trueba, P. B.; Jaskula-Goiris, B.; Ditrych, M.; Filipowska, W.; Brabanter, J. D.; Rouck, G. D.; Aerts, G.; Cooman, L. D.; Clippeleer, J. D. Monitoring the Evolution of Free and Cysteinylated Aldehydes from Malt to Fresh and Forced Aged Beer. Food Res. Int. 2021, 140, 110048–110058.
  • Ditrych, M.; Filipowska, W.; Rouck, G. D.; Jaskula-goiris, B.; Aerts, G.; Andersen, M. L.; Cooman, L. D. Investigating the Evolution of Free Staling Aldehydes throughout the Wort Production Process. Brewing Sci. 2019, 72, 10–17.
  • De Keukeleire, J.; Janssens, I.; Heyerick, A.; Ghekiere, G.; Cambie, J.; Roldán-Ruiz, I.; Van Bockstaele, E.; De Keukeleire, D. Relevance of Organic Farming and Effect of Climatological Conditions on the Formation of α-Acids, β-Acids, Desmethylxanthohumol, and Xanthohumol in Hop (Humulus lupulus L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 61–66.
  • De Keukeleire, J.; Ooms, G.; Heyerick, A.; Roldan-Ruiz, I.; Van Bockstaele, E.; De Keukeleire, D. Formation and Accumulation of α-Acids, β-Acids, Desmethylxanthohumol, and Xanthohumol during Flowering of Hops (Humulus lupulus L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 4436–4441.
  • Donner, P.; Pokorný, J.; Jezek, J.; Krofta, K.; Patzak, J.; Pulkrábek, J. Influence of Weather Conditions, Irrigation and Plant Age on Yield and Alpha-Acids Content of Czech Hop. Plant Soil Environ. 2020, 66, 41–46. DOI: 10.17221/627/2019-PSE.