Publication Cover
Experimental Aging Research
An International Journal Devoted to the Scientific Study of the Aging Process
Volume 40, 2014 - Issue 3
452
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Age Differences in Hindsight Bias: The Role of Episodic Memory and Inhibition

, , &
Pages 357-374 | Received 14 Jan 2013, Accepted 08 May 2014, Published online: 30 Apr 2014

REFERENCES

  • Bayen, U. J, Erdfelder, E, Bearden, J. N., & Lozito, J. P. (2006). The interplay of memory and judgment processes in effects of aging on hindsight bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1003–1018.
  • Bernstein, D. M., Erdfelder, E., Meltzoff, A. N., Perria, W., & Loftus, G. R. (2011). Hindsight bias from 3 to 95 years of age. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 378–391.
  • Bernstein, D. M., Thornton, W. L., & Sommerville, J. A. (2011). Theory of mind through the ages: Older and middle-aged adults exhibit more errors than do younger adults on a continuous false belief task. Experimental Aging Research, 37, 481–502.
  • Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2007). Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 938–956.
  • Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2012). Explaining adult age differences in decision-making competence. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25, 352–360.
  • Calvillo, D. P. (2012). Working memory and the memory distortion component of hindsight bias. Memory, 20, 891–898.
  • Delis, D. C., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J. H. (2001). Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
  • Delis, D. C., Kramer, J. H., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B. A. (2000). California Verbal Learning Test2nd ed. (CVLT-II). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test 3rd ed. (PPVT-III). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
  • Erdfelder, E., & Buchner, A. (1998). Decomposing the hindsight bias: A multinomial processing tree model for separating recollection and reconstruction in hindsight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 387–414.
  • Erdfelder, E., Brandt, M., & Bröder, A. (2007). Recollection biases in hindsight judgments. Social Cognition, 25, 114–131.
  • Fischhoff, B. (1975). Hindsight ≠ foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 288–299.
  • Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.
  • Guilbault, R. L., Bryant, F. B., Brockway, J. H., & Posavac, E. J. (2004). A meta–analysis of research on hindsight bias. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26, 103–117.
  • Hanoch, Y., Wood, S., & Rice, T. (2007). Bounded rationality, emotions, and older adult decision-making: Not so fast, and yet so frugal. Human Development, 50, 333–358.
  • Hardt, O., & Pohl, R. F. (2003). Hindsight bias as a function of anchor distance and anchor plausibility. Memory, 11, 397–394.
  • Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 22, pp. 193–225). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Hedden T., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2004). Insights into the ageing mind: A view from cognitive neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 87–96.
  • Hell, W., Gigerenzer, G., Gauggel, S., Mall, M., & Müller, M. (1988). Hindsight bias: An interaction of automatic and motivational factors? Memory and Cognition, 16, 533–538.
  • Kaufman, A. S. (2001). WAIS-III IQs, Horn’s theory, and generational changes from young adulthood to old age. Intelligence, 29, 131–167.
  • Kim, S., & Hasher, L. (2005). The attraction effect in decision-making: Superior performance in older adults. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 120–133.
  • Musch, J., & Wagner, T. (2007). Did everyone know it all along? A review of individual differences in hindsight bias. Social Cognition, 25, 64–82.
  • Nestler, S., Blank, H., & von Collani, G. (2008). Hindsight bias doesn’t always come easy: Causal models, cognitive effort, and creeping determinism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1043–1054.
  • Peters, E., Hess, T. M., Västfjäll, D., & Auman, C. (2007). Adult age differences in dual information processes: Implications for the role of affective and deliberative processes in older adults’ decision making. Perspectives on Psychological Sciences, 2, 1–23.
  • Pohl, R. F. (2007). Ways to assess hindsight bias. Social Cognition, 25, 14–31.
  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731.
  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
  • Roese, N. J., & Vohs, K. D. (2012). Hindsight bias. Perspectives on Psychological Sciences,7, 411–426.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Thornton, W. J. L., & Dumke, H. (2005). Age differences in everyday problem-solving and decision-making: A meta-analytic review. Psychology and Aging, 20, 85–99.
  • United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2005). World population prospects. The 2004 revision. New York: United Nations.
  • Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—3rd ed. (WAIS-III). New York: The Psychological Corporation.
  • Wood, S., Hanoch, Y., Barnes, A., Liu, P., Cummings, J., Bhattacharya, C., & Rice, T. (2011). Numeracy and Medicare Part D: The importance of choice and literacy for numbers in optimizing decision making for Medicare’s prescription drug program. Psychology and Aging, 26, 295–307.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.