Sentence Comprehension in Older Adults: Evidence for Risky Processing Strategies

REFERENCES

• Adams, B. C., Clifton, C., & Mitchell, D. C. (1998). Lexical guidance in sentence processing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 265–270. doi:10.3758/BF03212949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M., Savova, V., & Gibson, E. (2011). Syntax encodes information structure: Evidence from on-line reading comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 194–209.doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977–990. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, D., DeDe, G., Waters, G., Michaud, J., & Tripodis, Y. (2011). Effects of domain-general and domain-specific cognitive abilities on age-related changed in comprehension of sentences with relative clauses. Psychology and Aging, 26, 439–450. doi:10.1037/a0021837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (1999). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 77–126. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99001788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6
   Google Scholar
• DeDe, G. (2011). Utilization of prosodic information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39, 345–374. doi:10.1007/s10936-009-9139-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeDe, G. (2013). Verb transitivity bias affects on-line sentence reading in people with aphasia. Aphasiology, 27, 326–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeDe, G., Caplan, D., Kemtes, K., & Waters, G. S. (2004). The relationship between age, verbal working memory, and language comprehension. Psychology and Aging, 19, 601–616. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.19.4.601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (2005). Aging in context: Age-related changes in context use during language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 42, 133–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., Kutas, M., & Schul, R. (2010). Age-related and individual differences in the use of prediction during language comprehension. Brain and Language, 115, 149–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., McLennan, D. B., De Ochoa, E., & Kutas, M. (2002). The impact of semantic memory organization and sentence context information on spoken language processing by younger and older adults: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 39, 133–146. doi:10.1017.S004857720139203X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-Mental State”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198. doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., & Clifton, C., Jr. (1996). Construal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gahl, S. (2002). Lexical biases in aphasic sentence comprehension: An experimental and corpus linguistic study. Aphasiology, 16, 1173–1198. doi:10.1080/02687030244000428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemtes, K., & Kemper, S. (1997). Younger and older adults’ on-line processing of syntactically ambiguous sentence. Psychology and Aging, 12, 362–371. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.12.2.362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, R. (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106, 1126–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, R., Bicknell, K., Slattery, T., & Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movement evidence that readers maintain and act on uncertainty about past linguistic input. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 21086–21090. doi:10.1073.pnas.0907664106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. C., Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P.A. (1992). Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 56–98. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(92)90003-K
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676–703. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. C. (1987). Lexical guidance in human parsing: Locus and processing characteristics. In M. Coltheart ( Ed.), Attention and performance XII ( pp. 601–618). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Pearlmutter, N. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (1995). Individual differences and probabilistic constraints in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 521–542. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1995.1024
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Reichle, E., Stroud, M., Williams, C., & Pollatsek, A. (2006). The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers. Psychology and Aging, 21, 448–465. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.3.448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2007). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Shipley, W. C. (1940). A self-administered scale for measuring intellectual impairment and deterioration. Journal of Psychology, 9, 371–377. doi:10.1080/00223980.1940.9917704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub, A. (2007). The parser doesn’t ignore transitivity, after all. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 550–569. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub, A. (2010). Eye movements and processing difficulty in object relative clauses. Cognition, 116, 71–86. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Noh, S. R., & Shake, M. C. (2010). Age differences in the effects of conceptual integration training on resource allocation in sentence processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1430–1455. doi:10.1080/17470210903330983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stine-Morrow, E.A.L., Ryan, S., & Leonard, J. S. (2000). Age differences in on-line syntactic processing. Experimental Aging Research, 26, 315–322. doi:10.1080/036107300750015714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J., Williams, R. S., Blozis, S. A., & Morris, R. K. (2005). Working memory, animacy, and verb class in the processing of relative clauses. Journal of Memory & Language, 53, 204–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.010
   Google Scholar
• Trueswell, J. C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1994). Toward a lexical framework of constraint-based syntactic ambiguity resolution. In Clifton, C. Jr., Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. ( Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing ( pp. 155–179). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gompel, R. P. G., & Pickering, M. J. (2001). Lexical guidance in sentence processing: A note on Adams, Clifton, & Mitchell (1998). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 851–857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (2003). The reliability and stability of several working memory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 550–564. doi: 10.3758/BF03195534
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (2004). Verbal working memory and on-line syntactic processing: Evidence from self-paced listening. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 57, 129–163. doi:10.1080/02724980343000170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (2005). The relationship between age, processing speed, working memory capacity and language comprehension. Memory, 13, 403–413. doi:10.1080/09658210344000459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar