Relationships Between Strategy Switching and Strategy Switch Costs in Young and Older Adults: A Study in Arithmetic Problem Solving

REFERENCES

• Ardiale, E., Hodzik, S., & Lemaire, P. (2012). Aging and strategy switch costs: A study in arithmetic problem solving. L’Année Psychologique, 112, 345–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardiale, E., & Lemaire, P. (2012). Within-item strategy switching: An age comparative study in older adults. Psychology & Aging, 27, 1138–1151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardiale, E., & Lemaire, P. (2013). Effects of execution duration on within-item strategy switching in young and older adults. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 464–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. I. D. (2005). Handbook of mathematical cognition. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charness, N., & Campbell, J. I. D. (1988). Acquiring skill at mental calculation in adulthood: A task decomposition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 115–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deltour, J. J. (1993). Echelle de vocabulaire de Mill Hill de J.C. Raven. Adaptation française et normes européennes du Mill Hill et du Standard Progressive Matrices de Raven (PM38). [Mill-Hill vocabulary scale of J. C. Raven. French adaptation and European norms.] Braine-le-Château: Editions l’application des techniques modernes.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. (2001). Measuring strategy production during associative learning. The relative utility of concurrent versus retrospective reports. Memory & Cognition, 29, 247–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duverne, S., & Lemaire, P. (2005). Aging and arithmetic, In J. I. D. Campbell (ed.), The Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 397–412). New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, J. W., Ekstrom, R. B., & Price, I. A. (1963). Kit of Reference Tests for Cognitive Factors. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, A. A., & Anderson, J. W. (1983). Task complexity and problem solving performance in younger and older adults. Journal of Gerontology, 38, 72–77.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hodzik, S., & Lemaire, P. (2011). Inhibition and shifting capacities mediate adults’ age-related differences in strategy selection and repertoire. Acta Psychologica, 137, 335–344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurado, M. B., & Rosselli, M. (2007). The elusive nature of executive functions: A review of our current understanding. Neuropsychological Review, 17, 213–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kail, M., Lemaire, P., & Lecacheur, M. (2012). Online grammaticality judgments in French young and older adults. Experimental Aging Research, 38, 186–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kray, J., Li, K. Z. H., & Lindenberger, U. (2002). Age related changes in task-switching components: The role of task uncertainty. Brain and Cognition, 49, 363–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaire, P. (2010). Cognitive strategy variations during aging. Current Direction in Psychological Science, 19, 363–369.
   Google Scholar
• Lemaire, P., & Arnaud, L. (2008). Young and older adults’ strategies in complex arithmetic. American Journal of Psychology, 121, 1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaire, P., Arnaud, L., & Lecacheur, M. (2004). Adults’ age-related differences in adaptivity of strategy choices: Evidence from computational estimation. Psychology and Aging, 10, 467–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaire, P., & Lecacheur, M. (2010). Strategy switch costs in arithmetic problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 38, 322–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaire, P., & Reder, L. (1999). What affects strategy selection in arithmetic? An example of parity and five effects on product verification. Memory & Cognition, 22, 364–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovett, M. C., & Anderson, J. R. (1996). History of success and current context in problem solving: Combined influences on operator selection. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 168–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovett, M. C., & Schunn, C. D. (1999). Task representations, strategy variability, and base rate neglect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 107–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luwel, K., Schillemans, V., Onghena, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Does switching between strategies within the same task involve a cost? British Journal of Psychology, 100, 753–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacPherson, S. E., Phillips, L, H., & Della Sala S. (2002). Age, executive function, and social decision making: A dorsolateral prefrontal theory of cognitive aging. Psychology and Aging, 17, 598–609.
   Google Scholar
• Mata, R., Schooler, L. J., & Rieskamp, J. (2007). The aging decision maker: Cognitive aging and the adaptive selection of decision strategies. Psychology and Aging, 22, 796–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, J. C. (1951). Guide to using progressive matrices (1947), Sets A, Ab, B. London: Lewis.
   Google Scholar
• Reimers, S., & Maylor, E. A. (2005). Task switching across the lifespan: Effects of age on general and specific switch costs. Developmental Psychology, 41, 661–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieskamp, J., & Otto, P. E. (2006). SSL: A theory of how people learn to select strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 207–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schillemans, V., Luwel, K., Bulté, I., Onghena, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). The influence of previous strategy use on individuals’ subsequent strategy choice: Findings from a numerosity judgement task. Psychologica Belgica, 49, 191–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schillemans, V., Luwel, K., Ceulemans, E., Onghena, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2012). The effect of single versus repeated previous strategy use on individuals’ subsequent strategy choice. Psychologica Belgica, 52, 307–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schillemans, V., Luwel, K., Onghena, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2011). Strategy switch cost in mathematical thinking: Empirical evidence for its existence and importance. Mediterranean. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 10, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Siegler, R. S., & Araya, R. (2005). A computational model of conscious and unconscious strategy discovery. In R.V. Kail (Ed.), Advances in Child Development and Behavior (pp. 1–42). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Siegler, R. S., & Lemaire, P. (1997). Older and younger adults’ strategy choice in multiplication: Testing predictions of ASCM using the choice/no-choice method. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 126, 71–92.
   Google Scholar
• Siegler, R. S., & Shipley, C. (1995). Variation, selection, and cognitive change. In G. Halford & T. Simon (Eds.), Developing cognitive competence: New approaches to process modeling (pp. 31–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Uittenhove, K., & Lemaire, P. (2012). Sequential difficulty effects during strategy execution. A study in arithmetic. Experimental Psychology, 59, 295–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uittenhove, K., & Lemaire, P. (2013). Strategy sequential difficulty effects vary with working-memory and response-stimulus-intervals: A study in arithmetic. Acta Psychologica, 143, 113–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uittenhove, K., Poletti, C., Dufau, S., & Lemaire, P. (2013). The time course of strategy sequential difficulty effects: An ERP study in arithmetic. Experimental Brain Research, 227, 1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, M. M., & Anderson, J. R. (2009). The strategic nature of changing your mind. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 416–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar