Age Differences in Language Segmentation

REFERENCES

• Aaronson, D., & Scarborough, H. S. (1976). Performance theories for sentence coding: Some qualitative evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 56–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaronson, D., & Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Performance theories for sentence coding: Some quantitative models. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 277–303. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80052-2
   Google Scholar
• Chin, J., Payne, B. R., Gao, X., Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Morrow, D. G., Conner-Garcia, T., & Murray, M. D. (2015). Memory and comprehension for health information among older adults: Distinguishing the effects of domain-general and domain-specific knowledge. Memory, 23, 577–589.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, S. E., Marsiske, M., Thomas, K. R., Unverzagt, F. W., Wadley, V. G., Langbaum, J. B., & Crowe, M. (2013). Identification of mild cognitive impairment in ACTIVE: Algorithmic classification and stability. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 19, 73–87. doi: 10.1017/S1355617712000938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1983). Individual differences in integrating information between and within sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 561–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. A., & Bever, T. G. (1965). The psychological reality of linguistic segments. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4, 414–420. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(65)80081-0
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., Carlson, K., & Clifton, C., Jr. (2006). Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Science, 10, 244–249. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 6, 291–325. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(78)90002-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, X., Levinthal, B. R., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2012). The effects of ageing and visual noise on conceptual integration during sentence reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1833–1847. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.674146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, X., Noh, S. R., Eskew, R. T., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2011). Visual noise disrupts conceptual integration in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18, 83–88. doi: 10.3758/s13423-010-0014-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, D. W., Mitchell, D. C., & Hammond, E. J. (1981). The scheduling of text integration processes in reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 33, 455–464. doi: 10.1080/14640748108400803
   Google Scholar
• Haberlandt, K., & Graesser, A. C. (1989a). Buffering new information during reading. Discourse Processes, 12, 479–494. doi: 10.1080/01638538909544741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haberlandt, K., & Graesser, A. C. (1989b). Processing of new arguments at clause boundaries. Memory & Cognition, 17, 186–193. doi: 10.3758/BF03197068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haberlandt, K., Graesser, A. C., Schneider, N. J., & Kiely, J. (1986). Effects of task and new arguments on word reading times. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 314–322. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(86)90004-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye-movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 417–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirotani, M., Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (2006). Punctuation and intonation effects on clause and sentence wrap-up: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 425–443. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultsch, D. F., & Dixon, R. A. (1984). Memory for text materials in adulthood. In P. B. Baltes & O. G. Brim (Eds.), Life-span development and behavior (Vol. 6, pp. 77–108). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, W. (1950). The principles of psychology. Mineola, NY: Dover. Orginally published 1890.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. E. (2003). Aging and the remembering of text. Developmental Review, 23, 261–346. doi: 10.1016/S0273-2297(03)00009-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, K. L., & Zelinski, E. M. (2010). List and text recall differ in their predictors: Replication over samples and time. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65B, 449–458. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbq034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. J. F., & Rice, G. E. (1989). Prose processing in adulthood: The text, the reader, and the task. In L. W. Poon, D. C. Rubin, & B. A. Wilson (Eds.), Everyday cognition in adulthood and late life (pp. 157–194). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, L. M. S. (2001). The effects of real-world knowledge on text processing among older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 8, 137–148. doi: 10.1076/anec.8.2.137.843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, L. M. S. (2003). The effects of age and domain knowledge on text processing. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58, P217–P223. doi: 10.1093/geronb/58.4.P217
   Google Scholar
• Miller, L. M. S. (2009). Age differences in the effects of domain knowledge on reading efficiency. Psychology and Aging, 24, 63–74. doi: 10.1037/a0014586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, L. M. S., Cohen, J. A., & Wingfield, A. (2006). Contextual knowledge reduces demands on working memory during reading. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1355–1367. doi: 10.3758/BF03193277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, L. M. S., & Gagne, D. D. (2008). Adult age differences in reading and rereading processes associated with problem solving. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32, 34–45. doi: 10.1177/0165025407084050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, L. M. S., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (1998). Aging and the effects of knowledge on on-line reading strategies. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 53B, P223–P233. doi: 10.1093/geronb/53B.4.P223
   Google Scholar
• Miller, L. M. S., Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Kirkorian, H., & Conroy, M. (2004). Age differences in knowledge-driven reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 811–821. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, L. M. S., & West, R. L. (2009). The effects of age, control beliefs, and feedback on self-regulation of reading and problem solving. Experimental Aging Research, 36, 40–63. doi: 10.1080/03610730903418380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millis, K. K., & Just, M. A. (1994). The influence of connectives on sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 128–147. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1994.1007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Old, S. E., & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2008). Differential effects of age on item and associative measures of memory: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 23, 104–118. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.23.1.104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, B. R., Gao, X., Noh, S. R., Anderson, C. J., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2012). The effects of print exposure on sentence processing and memory in older adults: Evidence for efficiency and reserve. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 19, 122–149. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2011.628376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, B. R., Grison, S., Gao, X., Christianson, K., Morrow, D., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2014). Aging and individual differences in binding during sentence understanding: Evidence from temporary and global syntactic attachment ambiguities. Cognition, 130, 157–173. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, B. R., Gross, A. L., Parisi, J. M., Sisco, S. M., Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Marsiske, M., & Rebok, G. W. (2014). Modelling longitudinal changes in older adults’ memory for spoken discourse: Findings from the ACTIVE cohort. Memory, 22, 990–1001. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2013.861916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, B. R., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2012). Aging, parafoveal preview, and semantic integration in sentence processing: Testing the cognitive workload of wrap-up. Psychology and Aging, 27, 638–649. doi: 10.1037/a0026540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, B. R., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2014). Adult age differences in wrap-up during sentence comprehension: Evidence from ex-Gaussian distributional analyses of reading time. Psychology and Aging, 29, 213–228. doi: 10.1037/a0036282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, B. R., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (in press). Risk for mild cognitive impairment is associated with semantic integration deficits in sentence comprehension. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (1989). There are generalized abilities and one of them is reading. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction (pp. 307–335). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & van Gompel, R. P. G. (2006). Syntactic parsing. In M. J. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 455–503). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2006). Eye-movement control in reading. In M. J. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 613–657). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sedivy, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., Chambers, C. G., & Carlson, G. N. (1999). Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation. Cognition, 71, 109–147. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00025-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shake, M. C., Noh, S. R., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2009). Age differences in learning from text: Evidence for functionally distinct text processing systems. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 561–578. doi: 10.1002/acp.1494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharkey, N. E., & Sharkey, A. J. C. (1987). What is the point of integration? The loci of knowledge-based facilitation in sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 255–276. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(87)90114-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub, A., & Benatar, A. (2013). Individual differences in fixation duration distributions in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1304–1311. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0444-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stine, E. A. L. (1990). On-line processing of written text by younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 5, 68–78. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.5.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Milinder, L., Pullara, P., & Herman, B. (2001). Patterns of resource allocation are reliable among younger and older readers. Psychology and Aging, 16, 69–84. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.16.1.69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Miller, L. M. S., Gagne, D. D., & Hertzog, C. (2008). Self-regulated reading in adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 23, 131–153. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.23.1.131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Miller, L. M. S., & Hertzog, C. (2006). Aging and self-regulated language processing. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 582–606. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.4.582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Noh, S. R., & Shake, M. C. (2010). Age differences in the effects of conceptual integration training on resource allocation in sentence processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1430–1455. doi: 10.1080/17470210903330983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Shake, M. C., Miles, J. R., Lee, K., & McConkie, G. W. (2010). Pay now or pay later: Aging and the role of boundary salience in self-regulation of conceptual integration in sentence processing. Psychology and Aging, 25, 168–176. doi: 10.1037/a0018127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swets, B., Desmet, T., Hambrick, D. Z., & Ferreira, F. (2007). The role of working memory in syntactic ambiguity resolution: A psychometric approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 64–81. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.1.64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D., & Gibson, E. (2004). The relationship between intonational phrasing and syntactic structure in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 713–755. doi: 10.1080/01690960444000070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, J., & Rayner, K. (2000). Effects of titles on the processing of text and lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye movements. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1011–1021. doi: 10.3758/BF03209349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield, A. (1975). Acoustic redundancy and the perception of time compressed speech. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 18, 96–104. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1801.96
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield, A., Lahar, C. J., & Stine, E. A. L. (1989). Age and decision strategies in running memory for speech: Effects of prosody and linguistic structure. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 44, P106–P113. doi: 10.1093/geronj/44.4.P106
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wingfield, A., & Stine, E. A. L. (1986). Organizational strategies in immediate recall of rapid speech by young and elderly adults. Experimental Aging Research, 12, 79–83. doi: 10.1080/03610738608259440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield, A., Tun, P. A., & McCoy, S. L. (2005). Hearing loss in older Adulthood. What it is and how it interacts with cognitive performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 144–148. doi: 10.1111/cdir.2005.14.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield, A., Tun, P. A., & Rosen, M. J. (1995). Age differences in veridical and reconstructive recall of syntactically and randomly segmented speech. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 50B, P257–P266. doi: 10.1093/geronb/50B.5.P257
   Google Scholar
• Wingfield, A., Wayland, S. C., & Stine, E. A. L. (1992). Adult age differences in the use of prosody for syntactic parsing and recall of spoken sentences. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 47, P350–P356. doi: 10.1093/geronj/47.5.P350
   PubMedGoogle Scholar