Effects of Age, Acoustic Challenge, and Verbal Working Memory on Recall of Narrative Speech

REFERENCES

• Chein, J. M., & Fiez, J. A. (2010). Evaluating models of working memory through the effects of concurrent irrelevant information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 117–137. doi: 10.1037/a0018200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, A. R., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 769–786. doi: 10.3758/BF03196772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cousins, K. A. Q., Dar, H., Wingfield, A., & Miller, P. (2014). Acoustic masking disrupts time-dependent mechanisms of memory encoding in word-list recall. Memory & Cognition, 42, 622–638. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0377-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M. H., & Johnsrude, I. S. (2003). Hierarchical processing in spoken language comprehension. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 3423–3431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert, M. A., Menon, V., Walczak, A., Ahlstrom, J., Denslow, S., Horwitz, A., & Dubno, J. R. (2009). At the heart of the ventral attention system: The right anterior insula. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 2530–2541. doi: 10.1002/hbm.v30:8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erb, J., Henry, M. J., Eisner, F., & Obleser, J. (2013). The brain dynamics of rapid perceptual adaptation to adverse listening conditions. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 10688–10697. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4596-12.2013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallon, M., Peelle, J. E., & Wingfield, A. (2006). Spoken sentence processing in young and older adults modulated by task demands: Evidence from self-paced listening. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61, P10–P17. doi: 10.1093/geronb/61.1.P10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, A., Rosen, S., & Wilkinson, L. (2001). Effects of the number of channels and speech-to-noise ratio on rate of connected discourse tracking through a simulated cochlear implant speech processor. Ear and Hearing, 22, 431–438. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200110000-00007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freelon, D. (2010). ReCal: Intercoder reliability calculation as a Web service. International Journal of Internet Science, 5, 20–33.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, X., Levinthal, B. R., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2012). The effects of ageing and visual noise on conceptual integration during sentence reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1833–1847. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.674146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, X., Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Noh, S. R., & Eskew, R. T., Jr. (2011). Visual noise disrupts conceptual integration in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 83–88. doi: 10.3758/s13423-010-0014-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosselin, P. A., & Gagné, J.-P. (2011). Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing speech in noise. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 944–958. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0069)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich, A., Schneider, B. A., & Craik, F. I. M. (2008). Investigating the influence of continuous babble on auditory short-term memory performance. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 735–751. doi: 10.1080/17470210701402372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hervais-Adelman, A., Carlyon, R. P., Johnsrude, I. S., & Davis, M. H. (2012). Brain regions recruited for the effortful comprehension of noise-vocoded words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 1145–1166. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2012.662280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuchinsky, S. E., Ahlstrom, J. B., Vaden, K. I., Jr., Cute, S. L., Humes, L. E., Dubno, J. R., & Eckert, M. A. (2013). Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss. Psychophysiology, 50, 23–34. doi: 10.1111/psyp.2013.50.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lash, A., Rogers, C. S., Zoller, A., & Wingfield, A. (2013). Expectation and entropy in spoken word recognition: Effects of age and hearing acuity. Experimental Aging Research, 39, 235–253. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2013.779175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, D. P., Roediger, H. L. I., McDaniel, M. A., Balota, D. A., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2010). The relationship between working memory capacity and executive functioning: Evidence for a common executive attention construct. Neuropsychology, 24, 222–243. doi: 10.1037/a0017619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy, S. L., Tun, P. A., Cox, L. C., Colangelo, M., Stewart, R., & Wingfield, A. (2005). Hearing loss and perceptual effort: Downstream effects on older adults’ memory for speech. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58, 22–33. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P., & Wingfield, A. (2010). Distinct effects of perceptual quality on auditory word recognition, memory formation and recall in a neural model of sequential memory. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 4, 14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ng, E. H. N., Rudner, M., Lunner, T., Pedersen, M. S., & Rönnberg, J. (2013). Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users. International Journal of Audiology, 52, 433–441. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.776181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peelle, J. E. (2012). The hemispheric lateralization of speech processing depends on what “speech” is: A hierarchical perspective. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 309. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peelle, J. E., Troiani, V., Wingfield, A., & Grossman, M. (2010). Neural processing during older adults’ comprehension of spoken sentences: Age differences in resource allocation and connectivity. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 773–782. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Schneider, B. A., & Daneman, M. (1995). How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 593–608. doi: 10.1121/1.412282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquado, T., Benichov, J. I., Brownell, H., & Wingfield, A. (2012). The hidden effect of hearing acuity on speech recall, and compensatory effects of self-paced listening. International Journal of Audiology, 51, 576–583. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.684403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquado, T., Cousins, K. A. Q., Wingfield, A., & Miller, P. (2010). Effects of degraded sensory input on memory for speech: Behavioral data and a test of biologically constrained computational models. Brain Research Bulletin, 1365, 48–65. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.09.070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1968). Channel capacity, intelligibility and immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 241–248. doi: 10.1080/14640746808400158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. S., Jacoby, L. L., & Sommers, M. S. (2012). Frequent false hearing by older adults: The role of age differences in metacognition. Psychology and Aging, 27, 33–45. doi: 10.1037/a0026231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. S., & Wingfield, A. (2015). Stimulus-independent semantic bias misdirects word recognition in older adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138, EL26–EL30. doi: 10.1121/1.4922363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, J., Lunner, T., Zekveld, A., Sörqvist, P., Danielsson, H., Lyxell, B., … Rudner, M. (2013). The ease of language understanding (ELU) model: Theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7, 31. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00031
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rudner, M., Rönnberg, J., & Lunner, T. (2011). Working memory supports listening in noise for persons with hearing impairment. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 22, 156–167. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.22.3.4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, B. A., Daneman, M., & Murphy, D. R. (2005). Speech comprehension difficulties in older adults: Cognitive slowing or age-related changes in hearing?. Psychology and Aging, 20, 261–271. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.20.2.261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, B. A., Daneman, M., Murphy, D. R., & Kwong See, S. (2000). Listening to discourse in distracting settings: The effects of aging. Psychology and Aging, 15, 110–125. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.15.1.110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, R. V., Zeng, F.-G., Kamath, V., Wygonski, J., & Ekelid, M. (1995). Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science, 270, 303–304. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5234.303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, R., & Wingfield, A. (2009). Hearing loss and cognitive effort in older adults’ report accuracy for verbal materials. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 20, 147–154. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.20.2.7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Milinder, L. A., Pullara, O., & Herman, B. (2001). Patterns of resource allocation are reliable among younger and older readers. Psychology and Aging, 16, 69–84. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.16.1.69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Soederberg Miller, L. M., & Leno, R., III. (2001). Patterns of on-line resource allocation to narrative text by younger and older readers. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 8, 36–53. doi: 10.1076/anec.8.1.36.848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szenkovits, G., Peelle, J. E., Norris, D., & Davis, M. H. (2012). Individual differences in premotor and motor recruitment during speech perception. Neuropsychologia, 50, 1380–1392. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.02.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, A., & Greene, E. (1977). The construction and use of a propositional text base. Boulder, CO: Institute for the Study of Intellectual Behavior, University of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Tye-Murray, N., Sommers, M. S., Spehar, B., Myerson, J., Hale, S., & Rose, N. S. (2008). Auditory-visual discourse comprehension by older and young adults in favorable and unfavorable conditions. International Journal of Audiology, 47, S31–S37. doi: 10.1080/14992020802301662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaden, K. I., Jr., Kuchinsky, S. E., Cute, S. L., Ahlstrom, J. B., Dubno, J. R., & Eckert, M. A. (2013). The cingulo-opercular network provides word-recognition benefit. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 18979–18986. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1417-13.2013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Engen, K. J., Chandrasekaran, B., & Smiljanic, R. (2012). Effects of speech clarity on recognition memory for spoken sentences. PLoS ONE, 7, e43753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild, C. J., Yusuf, A., Wilson, D., Peelle, J. E., Davis, M. H., & Johnsrude, I. S. (2012). Effortful listening: The processing of degraded speech depends critically on attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 14010–14021. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1528-12.2012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield, A., Amichetti, N. M., & Lash, A. (2015). Cognitive aging and hearing acuity: Modeling spoken language comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 684. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield, A., & Ducharme, J. L. (1999). Effects of age and passage difficulty on listening-rate preferences for time-altered speech. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 54B, P199–P202. doi: 10.1093/geronb/54B.3.P199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield, A., & Grossman, M. (2006). Language and the aging brain: Patterns of neural compensation revealed by functional brain imaging. Journal of Neurophysiology, 96, 2830–2839. doi: 10.1152/jn.00628.2006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield, A., McCoy, S. L., Peelle, J. E., Tun, P. A., & Cox, C. (2006). Effects of adult aging and hearing loss on comprehension of rapid speech varying in syntactic complexity. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 17, 487–497. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17.7.4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield, A., Milstein, G., & Blumberg, M. (1984). Cerebral specialization and hemispheric performance asymmetries in narrative memory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 39–42. doi: 10.2466/pms.1984.59.1.39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield, A., & Tun, P. A. (2001). Spoken language comprehension in older adults: Interactions between sensory and cognitive change in normal aging. Seminars in Hearing, 22, 287–302. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-15632
   Google Scholar
• Wingfield, A., Tun, P. A., Koh, C. K., & Rosen, M. J. (1999). Regaining lost time: Adult aging and the effect of time restoration on recall of time-compressed speech. Psychology and Aging, 14, 380–389. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.14.3.380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield, A., Tun, P. A., & McCoy, S. L. (2005). Hearing loss in older adulthood: What it is and how it interacts with cognitive performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 144–148. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00356.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield, A., Tun, P. A., McCoy, S. L., Stewart, R. A., & Cox, L. C. (2006). Sensory and cognitive constraints in comprehension of spoken language in adult aging. Seminars in Hearing, 27, 273–283. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-954854
   Google Scholar
• Zachary, R. (1986). Shipley Institute for Living Scale. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
   Google Scholar
• Zekveld, A. A., Kramer, S. E., & Festen, J. M. (2010). Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: The influence of sentence intelligibility. Ear and Hearing, 31, 480–490. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181d4f251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekveld, A. A., Rudner, M., Johnsrude, I. S., Festen, J. M., Van Beek, J. H. M., & Rönnberg, J. (2011). The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise. Ear and Hearing, 32, e16–e25. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318228036a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar