Age-Related Changes in Attentional Control Using an N-Back Working Memory Paradigm

REFERENCES

• Amano, N., & Kondo, K. (2003). NTT database series: Lexical properties of Japanese, Vol. 2, CD-ROM version. Tokyo, Japan: Sanseido.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 417–423. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaman, C. P. (2005). Irrelevant sound effects amongst younger and older adults: Objective findings and subjective insights. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 241–265. doi: 10.1080/09541440440000023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (2007). Equivalent irrelevant-sound effects for old and young adults. Memory & Cognition, 35, 352–364. doi: 10.3758/BF03193456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, R., Buchner, A., & Mund, I. (2008). Age-related differences in irrelevant-speech effects. Psychology and Aging, 23, 377–391. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.23.2.377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belleville, S., Rouleau, N., Van der Linden, M., & Collette, F. (2003). Effect of manipulation and irrelevant noise on working memory capacity of patients with Alzheimer’s dementia. Neuropsychology, 17, 69–81. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.17.1.69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, M. C., Hasher, L., Connelly, S., & Zacks, R. T. (1995). Aging, distraction, and the benefits of predictable location. Psychology and Aging, 10, 427–436. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.10.3.427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, S., Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1991). Age and reading: The impact of distraction. Psychology and Aging, 6, 533–541. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.6.4.533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Fockert, J. W., Rees, G., Frith, C. D., & Lavie, N. (2001). The role of working memory in visual selective attention. Science, 291, 1803–1806. doi: 10.1126/science.1056496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbs, A. R., & Rule, B. G. (1989). Adult age differences in working memory. Psychology and Aging, 4, 500–503. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.4.4.500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazzaley, A., Cooney, J. W., Rissman, J., & D’Esposito, M. (2005). Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1298–1300. doi: 10.1038/nn1543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerreiro, M. J., & Van Gerven, P. W. (2011). Now you see it, now you don’t: Evidence for age-dependent and age-independent cross-modal distraction. Psychology and Aging, 26, 415–426. doi: 10.1037/a0021507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerreiro, M. J. S., Murphy, D. R., & Van Gerven, P. W. M. (2010). The role of sensory modality in age-related distraction: A critical review and a renewed view. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 975–1022. doi: 10.1037/a0020731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerreiro, M. J. S., Murphy, D. R., & Van Gerven, P. W. M. (2013). Making sense of age-related distractibility: The critical role of sensory modality. Acta Psychologica, 142, 184–194. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. (1988). Working memory, comprehension and aging: A review and a new view. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 193–225). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 75–82. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, N., Hirst, A., de Fockert, J. W., & Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 339–354. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lustig, C., Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (2007). Inhibitory deficit theory: Recent developments in a “new view”. In D. S. Gorfein & C. M. MacLeod (Eds.), The place of inhibition in cognition (pp. 145–162). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuoka, K., Uno, M., Kasai, K., Koyama, K., & Kim, Y. (2006). Estimation of premorbid IQ in individuals with Alzheimer’s disease using Japanese ideographic script (Kanji) compound words: Japanese version of national adult reading test. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 60, 332–339. doi: 10.1111/pcn.2006.60.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattay, V. S., Fera, F., Tessitore, A., Hariri, A. R., Berman, K. F., Das, S., & Weinberger, D. R. (2006). Neurophysiological correlates of age-related changes in working memory capacity. Neuroscience Letters, 392, 32–37. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.09.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, C. B., & LeCompte, D. C. (1999). The importance of semantic similarity to the irrelevant speech effect. Memory & Cognition, 27, 37–44. doi: 10.3758/BF03201211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, H. E., & McKenna, P. (1975). The use of current reading ability in the assessment of dementia. The British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 14, 259–267. doi: 10.1111/bjc.1975.14.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, R. C. (2004). Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. Journal of Internal Medicine, 256, 183–194. doi: 10.1111/jim.2004.256.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash, R. S., Heo, S., Voss, M. W., Patterson, B., & Kramer, A. F. (2012). Age-related differences in cortical recruitment and suppression: Implications for cognitive performance. Behavioural Brain Research, 230, 192–200. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.01.058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouleau, N., & Belleville, S. (1996). Irrelevant speech effect in aging: An assessment of inhibitory processes in working memory. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 51, 356–363. doi: 10.1093/geronb/51B.6.P356
   Google Scholar
• Van Gerven, P. W. M., Meijer, W. A., Vermeeren, A., Vuurman, E. F., & Jolles, J. (2007). The irrelevant speech effect and the level of interference in aging. Experimental Aging Research, 33, 323–339. doi: 10.1080/03610730701319145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gerven, P. W. M., & Murphy, D. R. (2010). Aging and distraction by irrelevant speech: Does emotional valence matter? Journal of Gerontology Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65, 667–670. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbq048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (1993). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (Rev. 10). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar