Category-Specific Visual Recognition and Aging from the PACE Theory Perspective: Evidence for a Presemantic Deficit in Aging Object Recognition

REFERENCES

• Bordaberry, P., Allard, M., & Delord, S. (2011). Evolution des traitements visuels dans la maladie de Parkinson et dans les syndromes apparentés. [Visual processing deficits in Parkinson disease and related syndromes]. In J. Bouisson, C. Brisset, I. Tournier, & C. Vion (Eds.), Vieillissement et vieillesse, vulnerabilite et ressources: Regards croises (pp. 149–160). Pessac, France: Maison des Sciences de l’Homme d’Aquitaine.
   Google Scholar
• Bordaberry, P., Lenoble, Q., & Delord, S. (2012). Vieillissement de la catégorisation visuelle d’objet: Interaction entre un déficit « fréquence spatiale spécifique » et un déficit « catégorie–spécifique ». [Aging of visual object recognition: Interaction between a ‘spatial frequency-specific’ deficit and a ‘category-specific’ deficit]. Gériatrie Et Psychologie Neuropsychiatrie du Vieillissement, 10, 453–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boucart, M., & Humphreys, G. W. (1992). Global shape cannot be attended without object identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 785–806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, L. E., Morrissey, B. F., & Goodale, M. A. (2009). Vision in the palm of your hand. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1621–1626. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.11.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappa, S., Frugoni, M., Pasquali, P., 1., & Zorat, F. (1997). Semantically bounded anomia. Brain and Language, 60, 15–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppens, P., & Frisinger, D. (2005). Category-specific naming effect in non-brain damaged individuals. Brain and Language, 94, 61–71. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbe, C. (1993). Trouble de la réfraction. Aspects cliniques et évolution spontanée [Refractive disorders. Clinical aspects and spontaneous course]. La Revue Du Praticien, 43, 1761–1764.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Faust, M. E., Balota, D. A., Spieler, D. H., & Ferraro, F. R. (1999). Individual differences in information processing rate and amount: Implications for group differences in response latency. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 777–799. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlach, C. (2001). Structural similarity causes different category-effects depending on task characteristics. Neuropsychologia, 39, 895–900. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00031-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlach, C. (2009). Category-specificity in visual object recognition. Cognition, 111, 281–301. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlach, C., Law, I., & Paulson, O. B. (2006). Shape configuration and category specificity. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1247–1260. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.09.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlach, C., & Toft, K. O. (2011). Now you see it, now you don’t: The context dependent nature of category-effects in visual object recognition. Visual Cognition, 19, 1262–1297. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2011.630044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonnerman, L. M., Andersen, E. S., Devlin, J. T., Kempler, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1997). Double dissociation of semantic categories in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain and Language, 57, 254–279. doi: 10.1006/brln.1997.1752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillis, A., & Caramazza, A. (1991). Category-specific naming and comprehension impairment: A double dissociation. Brain, 114, 2081–2094. doi: 10.1093/brain/114.5.2081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (1988). Cascade processes in picture identification. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 67–104. doi: 10.1080/02643298808252927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao, K. L., & Goodale, M. A. (2009). Enhanced detection of visual targets on the hand and familiar tools. Neuropsychologia, 47, 2454–2463. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.04.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laiacona, M., Barbarotto, R., & Capitani, E. (1998). Semantic category dissociations in naming: Is there a gender effect in Alzheimer’s disease? Neuropsychologia, 36, 407–419. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00125-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenoble, Q., Amieva, H., 1, & Delord, S. (2012). Alterations of the contrast gain during normal aging: A dissociation between Magnocellular and Parvocellular signatures for old and very-old groups. Journal of Vision, 12, 1214. doi: 10.1167/12.9.1214
   Google Scholar
• Lenoble, Q., Bordaberry, P., Renaut-Rougié, M.-B., Boucart, M., & Delord, S. (2013). Influence of visual deficits on object categorization in normal aging. Experimental Aging Research, 39, 145–161. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2013.761910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindholm, J. M., & Parkinson, S. R. (1983). An interpretation of age related differences in letter-matching performance. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 283–294. doi: 10.3758/BF03202866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd-Jones, T. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Perceptual differentiation as a source of category effects in object processing: Evidence from naming and object decision. Memory & Cognition, 25, 18–35. doi: 10.3758/BF03197282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd-Jones, T. J., & Luckhurs, L. (2002). Outline shape is a mediator of object recognition that is particularly important for living things. Memory & Cognition, 30, 489–498. doi: 10.3758/BF03194950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mareschal, D., & Johnson, M. H. (2003). The ‘what’ and ‘where’ of object representations in infancy. Cognition, 88, 259–276. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00039-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathey, S., & Postal, V. (2008). Le langage. In K. Dujardin & P. Lemaire (Eds.), Neuropsychologie du vieillissement normal et pathologique (Vol. 16, pp. 79–102). Issy-les17 moulineaux, France: Elsevier Masson.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, H., & Tyler, L. (1997). A category-specific semantic deficit for nonliving things in a case of progressive aphasia. Brain and Language, 60, 55–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, T., Woitalla, D., Peters, S., Kohla, K., & Przuntek, H. (2002). Progress of visual dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 105, 256–260. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2002.1o154.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olds, E. S., & Engel, A. (1998). Linearity across spatial frequency in object recognition. Vision Research, 38, 2109–2118. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00393-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owsley, C., Ball, K., McGwin, G., Jr., Sloane, M. E., Roenker, D. L., White, M. F., & Overlet, E. T. (1998). Visual processing impairment and risk of motor vehicle crash among older adults. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 279, 1083–1088. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.14.1083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owsley, C., Sekuler, R., & Siemsen, D. (1983). Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthood. Vision Research, 23, 689–699. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(83)90210-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmieri, T. J., Wong, A. C. N., & Gauthier, I. (2004). Computational approaches to the development of perceptual expertise. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 378–386. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, G. S., Ng, E. S., Bandeen-Roche, K., Keyl, P. M., Freeman, E. E., & West, S. K. (2007). A prospective, population-based study of the role of visual impairment in motor vehicle crashes among older drivers: The SEE study. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 48, 1483–1491. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacchetti, C., & Humphreys, G. (1992). Calling a squirrel a squirrel but a canoe a wigwam: A category specific deficit for artefactual objects and body parts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9, 73–86. doi: 10.1080/02643299208252053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommers, M. S., & Danielson, S. M. (1999). Inhibitory processes and spoken word recognition in young and older adults: The interaction of lexical competition and semantic context. Psychology and Aging, 14, 458–472. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.14.3.458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tippet, L. J., Meier, S. L., Blackwood, K., & Diaz-Asper, C. (2007). Category specific deficits in Alzheimer’s disease: Fact or artifact? Cortex, 43, 907–920. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70690-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannucci, M., Viggiano, M. P., & Argenti, F., 1. (2001). Identification of spatially filtered stimuli as function of the semantic category. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 475–478. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00086-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Viggiano, M. P., Righi, S., & Galli, G. (2006). Category-specific visual recognition as affected by aging and expertise. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 42, 329–338. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2005.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanlonghi, X., Charlier, J., & Chevalier, N. (1992). Sensibilité au contraste spatiale et âge [Spatial contrast sensitivity and aging]. Bulletin Social Ophtal France, 10, 921–929.
   Google Scholar