Aging and List-Wide Modulations of Strategy Execution:A Study in Arithmetic

References

• Allen, P. A., Ashcraft, M. H., & Weber, T. A. (1992). On mental multiplication and age. Psychology and Aging, 7, 536–545. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.7.4.536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, P. A., Bucur, B., Lemaire, P., Duverne, S., Ogrocki, P. K., & Sanders, R. E. (2005). Influence of probable Alzheimer’s disease on multiplication verification and production abstract. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 12, 1–31. doi: 10.1080/13825580490521322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardiale, E., & Lemaire, P. (2012). Within-item strategy switching: An age comparative study in adults. Psychology and Aging, 27, 1138–1151. doi: 10.1037/a0027772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, M. H., & Bataglia, J. (1978). Cognitive arithmetic: Evidence for retrieval and decision processes in mental addition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 527–538. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.4.5.527
   Google Scholar
• Bélanger, S., Belleville, S., & Gauthier, S. (2010). Inhibition impairments in Alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impairment and healthy aging: Effect of congruency proportion in a Stroop task. Neuropsychologia, 48, 581–590. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.10.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botvinick, M. M., Nystrom, L. E., Fissell, K. L., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (1999). Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulated cortex. Nature, 402, 179–181. doi: 10.1038/46035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugg, J. M., & Chanani, S. (2011). List-wide control is not entirely elusive: Evidence from picture–word Stroop. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 930–936. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0112-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugg, J. M., & Crump, M. J. C. (2012). In support of a distinction between voluntary and stimulus-driven control: A review of the literature on proportion congruent effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. I., & Austin, S. (2002). Effects of response time deadlines on adults’ strategy choices for simple addition. Memory & Cognition, 30, 988–994. doi: 10.3758/BF03195782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. I. D. (Ed.). (2005). Handbook of mathematical cognition. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. I. D., & Xue, Q. (2001). Cognitive arithmetic across cultures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 299–315. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.130.2.299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, C. S., Macdonald, A. M., Botvinick, M., Ross, L. L., Stenger, V. A., Noll, D., & Cohen, J. D. (2000). Parsing executive processes: Strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97, 1944–1948. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.4.1944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craik, F. I. M., & Salhouse, T. A. (2007). The handbook of aging and cognition (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deltour, J. J. (1993). Echelle de vocabulaire de Mill Hill de J.C. Raven. Adaptation française et normes européennes du Mill Hill et du Standard Progressive Matrices de Raven (PM38). Braine-le-Château, France: Editions l’application des techniques modernes.
   Google Scholar
• Duthoo, W., Abrahamse, E. L., Braem, S., Boehler, C. N., & Notebaert, W. (2014). The heterogeneous world of congruency sequence effects: An update. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1001. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, J. W., Ekstrom, R. B., & Price, I. A. (1963). Kit of reference tests for cognitive factors. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Geary, D. C. (1994). Children’s mathematical development. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Geary, D. C., & Brown, S. C. (1991). Cognitive addition: Strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in gifted, normal, and mathematically disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 27, 398–406. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.27.3.398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geary, D. C., Frensch, P. A., & Wiley, J. G. (1993). Simple and complex mental subtraction: Strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 8, 242–256. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.8.2.242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gratton, G., Coles, M. G., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480–506. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working Memory, Comprehension, and Aging: A Review and a New View. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 193–225). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hinault, T., Dufau, S., & Lemaire, P. (2014). Sequential modulations of poorer-strategy effects during strategy execution: An event-related potential study in arithmetic. Brain and Cognition, 91, 123–130. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerns, J. G. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303, 1023–1026. doi: 10.1126/science.1089910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunde, W., & Wühr, P. (2006). Sequential modulations of correspondence effects across spatial dimensions and tasks. Memory & Cognition, 34, 356–367. doi: 10.3758/BF03193413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaire, P. (2010). Cognitive strategy variations during aging. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 363–369. doi: 10.1177/0963721410390354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaire, P. (2016). Cognitive aging: The role of strategies. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lemaire, P., Arnaud, L., & Lecacheur, M. (2004). Adults’ age-related differences in adaptivity of strategy choices: Evidence from computational estimation. Psychology and Aging, 19, 467–481. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.19.3.467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaire, P., & Hinault, T. (2014). Age-related differences in sequential modulations of poorer-strategy effects. Experimental Psychology, 61, 253–262. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaire, P., & Leclère, M. (2014). Strategy repetition in young and older adults: A study in arithmetic. Developmental Psychology, 50, 460–468. doi: 10.1037/a0033527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaire, P., & Reder, L. (1999). What effects strategy selection in arithmetic? The example of parity and five effects on product verification. Memory & Cognition, 27, 364–382. doi: 10.3758/BF03211420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D., & Zbrodoff, N. J. (1979). When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Memory & Cognition, 7, 166–174. doi: 10.3758/BF03197535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D., Zbrodoff, N. J., & Williamson, J. (1984). Strategies in the color-word Stroop task. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22, 135–138. doi: 10.3758/BF03333784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovett, M. C., & Anderson, J. R. (1996). History of success and current context in problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 168–217. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1996.0016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovett, M. C., & Schunn, C. D. (1999). Task representations, strategy variability, and base-rate neglect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 107–130. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.128.2.107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, D., & Mitterer, J. O. (1982). Selective and divided attention in a Stroop task. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 684–700. doi: 10.1037/h0080661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rieskamp, J., & Otto, P. E. (2006). SSL: A theory of how people learn to select strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 207–236. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggio, L., Gherri, E., & Lupiáñez, J. (2012). Onset and offset as determinants of the Simon effect. Psicológica, 33, 209–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salthouse, T. A. (2010). Selective review of cognitive aging. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 16, 754–760. doi: 10.1017/S1355617710000706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlaghecken, F., & Martini, P. (2012). Context, not conflict, drives cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 272–278. doi: 10.1037/a0025791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, D. W., & Anderson, J. R. (2010). Asymmetric switch costs as sequential difficulty effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1873–1894. doi: 10.1080/17470211003624010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegler, R. S. (2007). Cognitive variability. Developmental Science, 10, 104–109. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00571.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegler, R. S., & Arraya, R. (2005). A computational model of conscious and unconscious strategy discovery. In R. V. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (pp. 1–42). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Siegler, R. S., & Lemaire, P. (1997). Older and younger adults’ strategy choices in multiplication: Testing predictions of ASCM using the choice/no-choice method. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 71–92. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.126.1.71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345–1363. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.28.6.1345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trbovich, P. L., & LeFevre, J. A. (2003). Phonological and visual working memory in mental addition. Memory & Cognition, 31, 738–745. doi: 10.3758/BF03196112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uittenhove, K., Burger, L., Taconnat, L., & Lemaire, P. (2015). Sequential difficulty effects during execution of memory strategies in young and older adults. Memory (Hove, England), 23, 806–816. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.928730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uittenhove, K., & Lemaire, P. (2012). Sequential difficulty effects during strategy execution. Experimental Psychology, 59, 295–301. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uittenhove, K., & Lemaire, P. (2013a). Strategy sequential difficulty effects vary with working-memory and response–stimulus-intervals: A study in arithmetic. Acta Psychologica, 143, 113–118. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uittenhove, K., & Lemaire, P. (2013b). Strategy sequential difficulty effects in Alzheimer patients: A study in arithmetic. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 35, 83–89. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2012.753036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uittenhove, K., & Lemaire, P. (2015). Numerical cognition during cognitive aging. In R. Cohen Kadosh, & A. Dowker (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of numerical cognition New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642342.013.045
   Google Scholar
• West, R., & Baylis, G. C. (1998). Effects of increased response dominance and contextual disintegration on the Stroop interference effect in older adults. Consciousness & Cognition, 17, 206–217. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.13.2.206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar