Parallel dual-task processing and task-shielding in older and younger adults: Behavioral and diffusion model results

References

• Allen, P. A., Lien, M.-C., Murphy, M. D., Sanders, R. E., Judge, K. S., & McCann, R. S. (2002). Age differences in overlapping-task performance: Evidence for efficient parallel processing in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 17, 505–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, P. A., Ruthruff, E., Elicker, J. D., & Lien, M.-C. (2009). Multisession, dual-task psychological refractory period practice benefits older and younger adults equally. Experimental Aging Research, 35, 369–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, P. A., Smith, A. F., Vires-Collins, H., & Sperry, S. (1998). The psychological refractory period: Evidence for age differences in attentional time-sharing. Psychology and Aging, 13, 218–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, M. (1996). The Freiburg Visual Acuity Test - automatic measurement of visual acuity. Optometry and Vision Science, 73, 49–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beurskens, R., & Bock, O. (2012). Age-related deficits of dual-task walking: A review. Neural Plasticity, 2012, 131608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, K. M., & Weywadt, C. (2013). Age differences in voluntary task switching. Psychology and Aging, 28, 1024–1031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ, S. E., White, D. A., Mandernach, T., & Keys, B. A. (2001). Inhibitory control across the life span. Developmental Neuropsychology, 20, 653–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppin, A. K., Shumway-Cook, A., Saczynski, J. S., Patel, K. V., Ble, A., Ferrucci, L., & Guralnik, J. M. (2006). Association of executive function and performance of dual-task physical tests among older adults: Analyses from the InChianti study. Age and Ageing, 35, 619–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellenbogen, R., & Meiran, N. (2008). Working memory involvement in duak-task performance: Evidence from the backward compatibility effect. Memory & Cognition, 36, 968–978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a non-search task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faust, M., Balota, D. A., Spieler, D. H., & Ferraro, F. R. (1999). Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: Implications for group differences in response latency. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 777–799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, R., Gottschalk, C., & Dreisbach, G. (2014). Context-sensitive adjustment of cognitive control in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 399–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, R., & Hommel, B. (2012). Deep thinking increases task-set shielding and reduces shifting flexibility in dual-task performance. Cognition, 123, 303–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giammarco, M., Thomson, S. J., & Watter, S. (2016). Dual task backward compatibility effects are episodically mediated. Attention, Performance & Psychophysics, 78, 520–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giesen, C., Eberhard, M., & Rothermund, K. (2015). Loss of attentional inhibition in older adults – Does it really exist? An experimental dissociation of inhibitory and memory retrieval processes. Psychology & Aging, 30, 220–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass, J. M., Schumacher, E. H., Lauber, E. J., Zurbriggen, E. L., Gmeindl, L., Kieras, D. E. & Meyer, D. E. (2000). Aging and the psychological refractory period: Task-coordination strategies in young and old adults. Psychology and Aging, 15, 571–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goschke, T., & Dreisbach, G. (2008). Conflict-triggered goal shielding. Response conflicts attenuate background monitoring for prospective memory cues. Psychological Science, 19, 25–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göthe, K., Oberauer, K., & Kliegl, R. (2007). Age differences in dual-task performance after practice. Psychology and Aging, 22, 596–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabbe, J. W., & Allen, P. A. (2012). Cross-task compatibility and age-related dual-task performance. Experimental Aging Research, 38, 469–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, A. A. (2001). Age differences in dual-task interference are localized to response-generation processes. Psychology and Aging, 16, 47–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, A. A., & Little, D. M. (1999). Age-related differences and similarities in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 416–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, A. A., & Maquestiaux, F. (2007). Success and failure at dual-task coordination by younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 22, 215–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, A. A., Maquestiaux, F., Festini, S. B., Frazier, K., & Krimmer, P. J. (2016). Backward compatibility effects in younger and older adults. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.78, 1337–1350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus–Response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1368–1384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B., & Eglau, B. (2002). Control of stimulus–Response translation in dual-task performance. Psychological Research, 66, 260–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishihara, S. (1972). Tests for colour-blindness. Tokyo: Kanehara Shuppan.Japan
   Google Scholar
• Janczyk, M. (2013). Level-2 perspective taking entails two processes: Evidence from PRP experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1878–1887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janczyk, M. (2016). Sequential modulation of backward crosstalk and task-shielding in dual-tasking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 631–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janczyk, MRenas, S. &Durst, M. (2017). Identifying the locus of compatibility-based backward crosstalk: Evidence from an extended PRP paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
   Google Scholar
• Janczyk, M., Augst, S., & Kunde, W. (2014). The locus of the emotional Stroop effect: A study with the PRP paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 151, 8–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janczyk, M., Büschelberger, J., & Herbort, O. (2017). Larger between-task crosstalk in children than in adults: Behavioral results from the backward-crosstalk paradigm and a diffusion model analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 155, 95–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janczyk, M., Dambacher, M., Bieleke, M., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2015). The benefit of no choice: Goal-directed plans enhance perceptual processing. Psychological Research, 79, 206–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janczyk, M., Pfister, R., Hommel, B., & Kunde, W. (2014). Who is talking in backward crosstalk? Disentangling response- from goal-conflict in dual-task performance. Cognition, 132, 30–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janczyk, M., Pfister, R., Wallmeier, G., & Kunde, W. (2014). Exceptions from the PRP effect? A comparison of prepared and unconditioned reflexes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 776–786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, A. F., Humphrey, D. G., Larish, J. F., Logan, G. D., & Strayer, D. L. (1994). Aging and inhibition: Beyond a unitary view of inhibitory processing in attention. Psychology and Aging, 9, 491–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunde, W., Pfister, R., & Janczyk, M. (2012). The locus of tool-transformation costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 703–714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawo, V., Philipp, A. M., Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2012). The role of task-preparation and task inhibition in age-related task-switching deficits. Psychology and Aging, 27, 1130–1137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehle, C., & Hübner, R. (2009). Strategic capacity sharing between two tasks: Evidence from tasks with the same and with different task sets. Psychological Research, 73, 707–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerche, V., & Voss, A. (2016). Model complexity in diffusion modeling: Benefits of making the model more parsimonious. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, K. Z. H., Lindenberger, U., Freund, A., & Baltes, P. B. (2001). Walking while memorizing: An SOC study of age-related differences in compensatory behavior under dual-task conditions. Psychological Science, (12), 230–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lien, M.-C., Allen, P., Ruthruff, E., Grabbe, J., McCann, R. S., & Remington, R. W. (2006). Visual word recognition without central attention: Evidence for greater automaticity with advancing age. Psychology and Aging, 21, 431–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D., & Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maquestiaux, F., Hartley, A., & Bertsch, J. (2004). Can practice overcome age-related differences in the psychological refractory period effect? Psychology and Aging, 19, 649–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masson, M. E. J. (2011). A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis testing. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 679–690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayr, U. (2001). Age differences in the selection of mental sets: The role of inhibition, stimulus ambiguity, and response-set overlap. Psychology and Aging, 16, 96–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2001). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (2013). Aging and predicting inferences: A diffusion model analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 240–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J., & Reynolds, A. (2003). The locus of redundant-targets and nontargets effects: Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 1126–1142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J., Ulrich, R., & Rolke, B. (2009). On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 273–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberauer, K., & Kliegl, R. (2004). Simultaneous cognitive operations in working memory after dual-task practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 689–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paelecke, M., & Kunde, W. (2007). Action-effect codes in and before the central bottleneck: Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 627–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 19–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfister, R., & Janczyk, M. (2013). Confidence intervals for two sample means: Calculation, interpretation, and a few simple rules. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 9, 74–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, V. E., & Neumann, E. (2009). Avoiding the potential pitfalls of using negative priming tasks in developmental studies: Assessing inhibitory control in children, adolescents, and adults. Developmental Psychology, 45, 272–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puccioni, O., & Vallesi, A. (2012). Conflict resolution and adaptation in normal aging: The role of verbal intelligence and cognitive reserve. Psychology & Aging, 27, 1018–2016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. In P. V. Marsden (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 111–196). Cambridge: Blackwell.UK
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., & Smith, P. L. (2004). A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. Psychological Review, 111, 333–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., Gomez, P., & McKoon, G. (2004). A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging in the lexical-decision task. Psychology and Aging, 19, 278–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., & McKoon, G. (2007). Application of the diffusion model to two choice tasks for adults 75–90 years old. Psychology and Aging, 22, 56–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salthouse, T. A. (1990). Working memory as a processing resource in cognitive aging. Developmental Review, 10, 101–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherbaum, S., Gottschalk, C., Dshemuchadse, M., & Fischer, R. (2015). Action dynamics in multitasking: The impact of additional task factors on the execution of the prioritized motor movement. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmiedek, F., Oberauer, K., Wilhelm, O., Süss, H. M., & Wittmann, W. W. (2007). Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 414–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, T., Fischer, R., & Stelzel, C. (2008). Response activation in overlapping tasks and the response-selection bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 376–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuch, S. (2016). Task inhibition and response inhibition in older versus younger adults: A diffusion model analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweickert, R. (1978). A critical path generalization of the additive factor method: Analysis of a Stroop task. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 18, 105–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 1345–1363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telford, C. W. (1931). The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, S. J., Danis, L. K., & Watter, S. (2015). PRP training shows Task 1 response selection is the locus of the backward response compatibility effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(1), 212–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, S. J., & Watter, S. (2013). Information continuity across the response selection bottleneck: Early parallel Task 2 response activation contributes to overt Task 2 performance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(5), 934–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R., Schröter, H., Leuthold, H., & Birngruber, T. (2015). Automatic and controlled stimulus processing in conflict tasks: Superimposed diffusion processes and delta functions. Cognitive Psychology, 78, 148–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhaeghen, P., & Cerella, J. (2002). Aging, executive control, and attention: A review of meta-analyses. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 26, 849–857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhaeghen, P., & Salthouse, T. A. (1997). Meta-analyses of age-cognition relations in adulthood: Estimates of linear and nonlinear age effects and structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 231–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhaeghen, P., Steitz, D. W., Sliwinski, M. J., & Cerella, J. (2003). Aging and dual-task performance: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 18, 443–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, A., Rothermund, K., Gast, A., & Wentura, D. (2013). Cognitive processes in associative and categorical priming: A diffusion model analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 536–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, A., & Voss, J. (2007). Fast-dm: A free program for efficient diffusion model analysis. Behavioral Research Methods, 39, 767–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, A., Voss, J., & Lerche, V. (2015). Assessing cognitive processes with diffusion model analyses: A tutorial based on fast-dm-30. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 779–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1981). WAIS-R manual: Wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised. Psychological CorporationSan Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Welford, A. T. (1952). The “psychological refractory period” and the timing of high‐speed performance: A review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology. General Section, 43, 2–19.
   Google Scholar
• West, R., & Moore, K. (2005). Adjustment of cognitive control in younger and older adults. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 41, 570–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield, A., Stine, E. A. L., Lahar, C. J., & Aberdeen, J. S. (1988). Does the capacity of working memory change with age? Experimental Aging Research, 14, 103–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar