Publication Cover
Experimental Aging Research
An International Journal Devoted to the Scientific Study of the Aging Process
Volume 45, 2019 - Issue 5
182
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Aging Effects on the Visual Span for Alphabetic Stimuli

, , &
Pages 387-399 | Received 09 Mar 2019, Accepted 15 May 2019, Published online: 13 Sep 2019

References

  • Ben-David, B. M., Erel, H., Goy, H., & Schneider, B. A. (2015). “Older is always better”: Age-related differences in vocabulary scores across 16 years. Psychology and Aging, 30(4), 856–862. doi:10.1037/pag0000051
  • Bouma, H. (1970). Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature, 226(241), 177–178. doi:10.1038/226177a0
  • Braze, D., Tabor, W., Shankweiler, D. P., & Mencl, W. E. (2007). Speaking up for vocabulary: Reading skill differences in young adults. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(3), 226–243. doi:10.1177/00222194070400030401
  • Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97(4), 523–547.
  • Cheong, A. M., Legge, G. E., Lawrence, M. G., Cheung, S. H., & Ruff, M. A. (2008). Relationship between visual span and reading performance in age-related macular degeneration. Vision Research, 48(4), 577–588. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.11.022
  • Cheong, A. M. Y., Legge, G. E., Lawrence, M. G., Cheung, S.-H., & Ruff, M. A. (2007). Relationship between slow visual processing and reading speed in people with macular degeneration. Vision Research, 47(23), 2943–2955. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.07.010
  • Elliott, D. B., Yang, K. C., & Whitaker, D. (1995). Visual acuity changes throughout adulthood in normal, healthy eyes: Seeing beyond 6/6. Optometry and Vision Science, 72, 186–191.
  • Ferris, F. L., & Bailey, I. (1996). Standardizing the measurement of visual acuity for clinical research studies: Guidelines from the Eye Care Technology Forum. Ophthalmology, 103(1), 181–182. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30742-2
  • Frey, A., & Bosse, M. L. (2018). Perceptual span, visual span, and visual attention span: Three potential ways to quantify limits on visual processing during reading. Visual Cognition, 26, 412–429. doi:10.1080/13506285.2018.1472163
  • Grainger, J., Dufau, S., & Ziegler, J. C. (2016). A vision of reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 171–179. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.12.008
  • Han, T., & Kobayashi, K. (2002). Mathematics of information and coding. American Mathematical Society, 203, 19–20.
  • He, Y., & Legge, G. E. (2017). Linking crowding, visual span, and reading. Journal of Vision, 17(11), 11, 1–15. doi:10.1167/17.11.11
  • He, Y., Scholz, J. M., Gage, R., Kallie, C. S., Liu, T., & Legge, G. E. (2015). Comparing the visual spans for faces and letters. Journal of Vision, 15(8), 7, 1–13. doi:10.1167/15.8.7
  • Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 417–429.
  • Hilz, R., & Cavonius, C. R. (1974). Functional organization of the peripheral retina: Sensitivity to periodic stimuli. Vision Research, 14(12), 1333–1337. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(74)90006-6
  • Jordan, T. R., Patching, G. R., & Milner, A. D. (1998). Central fixations are inadequately controlled by instructions alone: Implications for studying cerebral asymmetry. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 51(2), 371–391. doi:10.1080/713755764
  • Jordan, T. R., Patching, G. R., & Milner, A. D. (2000). Lateralized word recognition: Assessing the role of hemispheric specialization, modes of lexical access and perceptual asymmetry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1192–1208. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.26.3.1192
  • Jordan, T. R., & Paterson, K. B. (2009). Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: A critical assessment of recent research. Neuropsychologia, 47(12), 2341–2353. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.07.020
  • Jordan, T. R, Paterson, K. B., Kurtev, S., & Xu, M. (2009). Do fixation cues ensure fixation accuracy in split-fovea studies of word recognition?Neuropsychologia, 47, 2004–2007.
  • Kemper, S., & McDowd, J. (2006). Eye movements of young and older adults while reading with distraction. Psychology and Aging, 21, 32–39. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.32
  • Kennison, S. M., & Clifton, C. (1995). Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: Implications for eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 68–81.
  • Keuleers, E., Stevens, M., Mandera, P., & Brysbaert, M. (2015). Word knowledge in the crowd: Measuring vocabulary size and word prevalence in a massive online experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(8), 1665–1692. doi:10.1080/17470218.2015.1022560
  • Kliegl, R., Grabner, E., Rolfs, M., & Engbert, R. (2004). Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1–2), 262–284. doi:10.1080/09541440340000213
  • Kosnik, W., Kline, D., Fikre, J., & Sekuler, R. (1987). Ocular fixation control as a function of age and exposure duration. Psychology and Aging, 2(3), 302–305.
  • Kwon, M., Legge, G. E., & Dubbels, B. R. (2007). Developmental changes in the visual span for reading. Vision Research, 47(22), 2889–2900. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.08.002
  • Legge, G. E., Ahn, S. J., Klitz, T. S., & Luebker, A. (1997). Psychophysics of reading. XVI. The visual span in normal and low vision. Vision Research, 37, 1999–2010. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00017-5
  • Legge, G. E., Cheung, S. H., Yu, D., Chung, S. T., Lee, H. W., & Owens, D. P. (2007). The case for the visual span as a sensory bottleneck in reading. Journal of Vision, 7(2), 9,1–15. doi:10.1167/7.2.9
  • Legge, G. E., Mansfield, J. S., & Chung, S. T. (2001). Psychophysics of reading: XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision. Vision Research, 41(6), 725–743. doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00295-9
  • Levi, D. M. (2011). Visual crowding. Current Biology, 21, 678–679. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.07.025
  • Liu, R., Patel, B. N., & Kwon, M. (2017). Age-related changes in crowding and reading speed. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 8271. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-08652-0
  • Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390(6657), 279–281. doi:10.1038/36846
  • McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 17(6), 578–586. doi:10.3758/BF03203972
  • McGowan, V. A., White, S. J., Jordan, T. R., & Paterson, K. B. (2014). Aging and the use of interword spaces during reading: Evidence from eye movements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(3), 740–747. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0527-8
  • McGowan, V. A., White, S. J., & Paterson, K. B. (2015). The effects of interword spacing on the eye movements of young and older readers. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(5), 609–621. doi:10.1080/20445911.2014.988157
  • Mund, I., Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (2010). Age differences in reading with distraction: Sensory or inhibitory deficits? Psychology and Aging, 25, 886–897. doi:10.1037/a0019508
  • Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., … Chertkow, H. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53, 695–699. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x
  • O’Regan, J. K. (1990). Eye movements and reading. In E. Kowler (Ed.), Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes, (pp. 395–453). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Owsley, C. (2011). Aging and vision. Vision Research, 51(13), 1610–1622. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.10.020
  • Owsley, C., Sekuler, R., & Siemsen, D. (1983). Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthood. Vision Research, 23, 689–699. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(83)90210-9
  • Paterson, K. B., McGowan, V. A., & Jordan, T. R. (2013a). Filtered text reveals adult age differences in reading: Evidence from eye movements. Psychology and Aging, 28(2), 352–364. doi:10.1037/a0030350
  • Paterson, K. B., McGowan, V. A., & Jordan, T. R. (2013b). Aging and the control of binocular fixations during reading. Psychology and Aging, 28(3), 789–795. doi:10.1037/a0033328
  • Paterson, K. B., McGowan, V. A., & Jordan, T. R. (2013c). Effects of adult aging on reading filtered text: Evidence from eye movements. PeerJ, 1, e63. doi:10.7717/peerj.63
  • Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
  • Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. doi:10.1080/17470210902816461
  • Rayner, K., Castelhano, M. S., & Yang, J. (2009). Eye movements and the perceptual span in older and younger readers. Psychology and Aging, 24(3), 755–760. doi:10.1037/a0014300
  • Rayner, K., Reichle, E. D., Stroud, M. J., Williams, C. C., & Pollatsek, A. (2006). The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers. Psychology and Aging, 21(3), 448–465. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.3.448
  • Rayner, K., Yang, J., Schuett, S., & Slattery, T. J. (2014). The effect of foveal and parafoveal masks on the eye movements of older and younger readers. Psychology and Aging, 29(2), 205–212. doi:10.1037/a0036015
  • Risse, S., & Kliegl, R. (2011). Adult age differences in the perceptual span during reading. Psychology and Aging, 26(2), 451–460. doi:10.1037/a0021616
  • Scialfa, C. T., Cordazzo, S., Bubric, K., & Lyon, J. (2013). Aging and visual crowding. Journals of Gerontology, 68(4), 522–528. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbs086
  • Scialfa, C. T., Cordazzo, S., Bubric K., & Lyon, J.. (2013). Aging and visual crowding. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Science, 6, 522–528. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbs086
  • Stine-Morrow, E. A., Shake, M. C., Miles, J. R., Lee, K., Gao, X., & McConkie, G. (2010). Pay now or pay later: Aging and the role of boundary salience in self-regulation of conceptual integration in sentence processing. Psychology and Aging, 25(1), 168–176. doi:10.1037/a0018127
  • Wang, H., He, X., & Legge, G. E. (2014). Effect of pattern complexity on the visual span for Chinese and alphabet characters. Journal of Vision, 14(8), 6,1–17.
  • Warrington, K., White, S. J., & Paterson, K. B. (2018). Ageing and the misperception of words: Evidence from eye movements during reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 75–84. doi:10.1080/17470218.2016.1251471
  • Warrington, K. L., McGowan, V. A., Paterson, K. B., & White, S. J. (2018). Effects of aging, word frequency and text stimulus quality on reading across the adult lifespan: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44, 1714–1729. doi:10.1037/xlm0000543
  • Warrington, K.L., McGowan, V.A., White, S.J., & Paterson, K.B. (2019). Effects of adult aging on letter position coding in reading: Evidence from eye movements. Psychology and Aging, 34, 598–612. doi:10.1037/pag0000342
  • Whitford, V., & Titone, D. (2016). Eye movements and the perceptual span during first-and second-language sentence reading in bilingual older adults. Psychology and Aging, 31(1), 58–70. doi:10.1037/a0039971
  • Whitford, V., & Titone, D. (2017). The effects of word frequency and word predictability during first- and second-language paragraph reading in bilingual older and younger adults. Psychology and Aging, 32, 158–177. doi:10.1037/pag0000151
  • Whitney, D., & Levi, D. M. (2011). Visual crowding: A fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 160–168. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.02.005
  • Yu, D., Cheung, S. H., Legge, G. E., & Chung, S. T. L. (2007). Effect of letter spacing on visual span and reading speed. Journal of Vision, 7, 2–10. doi:10.1167/7.2.2
  • Yu, D., Legge, G. E., Wagoner, G., & Chung, S. T. (2014). Sensory factors limiting horizontal and vertical visual span for letter recognition. Journal of Vision, 14(9), 23. doi:10.1167/14.9.23

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.