Structuralist Mental Representation of Dual-action Demands: Mechanisms of Improved Dual-task Performance after Practice in Older Adults

References

• Allen, P. A., Lien, M.-C., Ruthruff, E., & Voss, A. (2014). Multitasking and aging: Do older adults benefit from performing a highly practiced task? Experimental Aging Research, 40(3), 280–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, P. A., Ruthruff, E., Elicker, J. D., & Lien, M.-C. (2009). Multisession, dual-task psychological refractory period practice benefits older and younger adults equally. Experimental Aging Research, 35(4), 369–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, P. A., Smith, A. F., Vires-Collins, H., & Sperry, S. (1998). The psychological refractory period: Evidence for age differences in attentional time-sharing. Psychology and Aging, 13(2), 218–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, A., & Mattila, W. R. (1989). Response slowing of older adults: Effects of time-limit contingencies on single-and dual-task performances. Psychology and Aging, 4(1), 66–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beringer, J. (2000). Experimental Runtime System. Frankfurt am Main (1987–2000).
   Google Scholar
• Bertelson, P. (1965). Serial choice reaction-time as a function of response versus signal-and-response repetition. Nature, 206(4980), 217–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bherer, L., Kramer, A. F., Peterson, M. S., Colcombe, S., Erickson, K., & Becic, E. (2005). Training effects on dual-task performance: Are there age-related differences in plasticity of attentional control? Psychology and Aging, 20(4), 695–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bherer, L., Kramer, A. F., Peterson, M. S., Colcombe, S., Erickson, K., & Becic, E. (2006). Testing the limits of cognitive plasticity in older adults: Application to attentional control. Acta Psychologica, 123(3), 261–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bherer, L., Kramer, A. F., Peterson, M. S., Colcombe, S., Erickson, K., & Becic, E. (2008). Transfer effects in task-set cost and dual-task cost after dual-task training in older and younger adults: Further evidence for cognitive plasticity in attentional control in late adulthood. Experimental Aging Research, 34(3), 188–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bier, B., Ouellet, É., & Belleville, S. (2018). Computerized attentional training and transfer with virtual reality: Effect of age and training type. Neuropsychology, 32(5), 597–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, R., & Hommel, B. (2012). Deep thinking increases task-set shielding and reduces shifting flexibility in dual-task performance. Cognition, 123(2), 303–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frings, C., Hommel, B., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Moeller, B., Möller, M., Pfister, R., & Philipp, A. (2020). Binding and retrieval in action control (BRAC). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24, 375–387.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, J. M., Schumacher, E. H., Lauber, E. J., Zurbriggen, E. L., Gmeindl, L., Kieras, D. E., & Meyer, D. E. (2000). Aging and the psychological refractory period: Task-coordination strategies in young and old adults. Psychology and Aging, 15(4), 571–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, A. A. (2001). Age differences in dual-task interference are localized to response-generation processes. Psychology and Aging, 16(1), 47–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, A. A., & Little, D. M. (1999). Age-related differences and similarities in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(4), 416–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, A. A., Maquestiaux, F., & Silverman Butts, N. (2011). A demonstration of dual-task performance without interference in some older adults. Psychology and Aging, 26(1), 181–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazeltine, E., Aparicio, P., Weinstein, A., & Ivry, R. B. (2007). Configural response learning: The acquisition of a nonpredictive motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(6), 1451–1467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazeltine, E., Teague, D., & Ivry, R. B. (2002). Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(3), 527–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hein, G., & Schubert, T. (2004). Aging and input processing in dual-task situations. Psychology and Aging, 19(3), 416–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(5), 1368–1384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. EnglewoodCliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T., & Jagacinski, R. J. (2011). Gestalt principles in the control of motor action. Psychological Bulletin, 137(3), 443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinsorge, T. (1999). Response repetition benefits and costs. Acta Psychologica, 103(3), 295–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, I., Poljac, E., Müller, H., & Kiesel, A. (2018). Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking—An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research. Psychological Bulletin, 144(6), 557–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, A. F., Larish, J. F., & Strayer, D. L. (1995). Training for attentional control in dual task settings: A comparison of young and old adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1(1), 50–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liepelt, R., Strobach, T., Frensch, P., & Schubert, T. (2011). Improved intertask coordination after extensive dual-task practice. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(7), 1251–1272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D., & Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108(2), 393–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maquestiaux, F., Didierjean, A., Ruthruff, E., Chauvel, G., & Hartley, A. (2013). Lost ability to automatize task performance in old age. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(6), 1206–1212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maquestiaux, F., Hartley, A. A., & Bertsch, J. (2004). Can practice overcome age-related differences in the psychological refractory period effect? Psychology and Aging, 19(4), 649–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maquestiaux, F., Laguë-Beauvais, M., Bherer, L., & Ruthruff, E. (2008). Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Evidence for task automatization and greedy resource recruitment. Memory & Cognition, 36(7), 1262–1282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maquestiaux, F., Laguë-Beauvais, M., Ruthruff, E., Hartley, A., & Bherer, L. (2010). Learning to bypass the central bottleneck: Declining automaticity with advancing age. Psychology and Aging, 25(1), 177–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowd, J. M., & Shaw, R. J. (2000). Attention and aging: A functional perspective. In The handbook of aging and cognition (2 ed., pp. 221–292). Mahwah, NJ US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review, 104(4), 749–791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2019). From simple to complex actions: Response–response bindings as a new approach to action sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(1), 174–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navon, D., & Miller, J. (2002). Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion. Cognitive Psychology, 44(3), 193–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nino, R. S., & Rickard, T. C. (2003). Practice effects on two memory retrievals from a single cue. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(3), 373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberauer, K., & Kliegl, R. (2004). Simultaneous cognitive operations in working memory after dual-task practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(4), 689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orscheschek, F., Strobach, T., Schubert, T., & Rickard, T. (2019). Two retrievals from a single cue: A bottleneck persists across episodic and semantic memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(5), 1005–1028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 220–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruthruff, E., Johnston, J. C., & Van Selst, M. (2001). Why practice reduces dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(1), 3–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruthruff, E., Van Selst, M., Johnston, J. C., & Remington, R. (2006). How does practice reduce dual-task interference: Integration, automatization, or just stage-shortening? Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 70(2), 125–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, T. (1999). Processing differences between simple and choice reactions affect bottleneck localization in overlapping tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(2), 408–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, T. (2008). The central attentional limitation and executive control. Frontiers in Bioscience, 13(13), 3569–3580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, T., & Strobach, T. (2018). Practice-related optimization of dual-task performance: Efficient task instantiation during overlapping task processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(12), 1884–1904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher, E. H., Seymour, T. L., Glass, J. M., Fencsik, D. E., Lauber, E. J., Kieras, D. E., & Meyer, D. E. (2001). Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance: Uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck. Psychological Science, 12(2), 101–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobach, T. (2020). The dual-task practice advantage: Empirical evidence and cognitive mechanisms. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(1), 3–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobach, T., Frensch, P., Müller, H., & Schubert, T. (2015). Evidence for the acquisition of dual-task coordination skills in older adults. Acta Psychologica, 160, 104–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobach, T., Frensch, P. A., Müller, H. J., & Schubert, T. (2012a). Age- and practice-related influences on dual-task costs and compensation mechanisms under optimal conditions of dual-task performance. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 19(1–2), 222–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobach, T., Frensch, P. A., Müller, H. J., & Schubert, T. (2012b). Testing the limits of optimizing dual-task performance in younger and older adults. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6,39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobach, T., Frensch, P. A., Soutschek, A., & Schubert, T. (2012). Investigation on the improvement and transfer of dual-task coordination skills. Psychological Research, 76(6), 794–811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobach, T., Liepelt, R., Pashler, H., Frensch, P. A., & Schubert, T. (2013). Effects of extensive dual-task practice on processing stages in simultaneous choice tasks. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(5), 900–920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobach, T., & Schubert, T. (2017). No evidence for task automatization after dual-task training in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 32(1), 28–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobach, T., Schubert, T., Pashler, H., & Rickard, T. (2014). The specificity of learned parallelism in dual-memory retrieval. Memory & Cognition, 42(4), 552–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, S. J., Danis, L. K., & Watter, S. (2015). PRP training shows Task1 response selection is the locus of the backward response compatibility effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(1), 212–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titchener, E. B. (1906). Experimental psychology: A manual of laboratory practice (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tombu, M., & Jolicœur, P. (2004). Virtually no evidence for virtually perfect time-sharing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(5), 795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Selst, M., Ruthruff, E., & Johnston, J. C. (1999). Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(5), 1268–1283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhaeghen, P., Steitz, D. W., Sliwinski, M. J., & Cerella, J. (2003). Aging and dual-task performance: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 18(3), 443–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., Singh, M., & von der Heydt, R. (2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure–ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertheimer, M. (1922). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. Psychologische Forschung, 1(1), 47–58.
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D. (2008). Multiple resources and mental workload. Human Factors, 50(3), 449–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wundt, W. (1862). Beiträge zur Theorie der Sinneswahrnehmung. Leipzig, Germany: Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Zehetleitner, M., Rangelov, D., & Müller, H. J. (2012). Partial repetition costs persist in nonsearch compound tasks: Evidence for multiple-weighting-systems hypothesis. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(5), 879–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zmigrod, S., & Hommel, B. (2010). Temporal dynamics of unimodal and multimodal feature binding. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(1), 142–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar