Publication Cover
Experimental Aging Research
An International Journal Devoted to the Scientific Study of the Aging Process
Volume 50, 2024 - Issue 2
250
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Lack of Interaction Motivation in Older Adults Automatically Reduces Cognitive Empathy

, , , , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 225-247 | Received 09 May 2022, Accepted 11 Jan 2023, Published online: 22 Feb 2023

References

  • Adolphs, R. (2002). Neural systems for recognizing emotion. Current opinion in neurobiology, 12(2), 169–177. doi:10.1016/S0959-4388(02)00301-X
  • Bailey, P. E., Henry, J. D., & Von Hippel, W. (2008). Empathy and social functioning in late adulthood. Aging & Mental Health, 12(4), 499–503. doi:10.1080/13607860802224243
  • Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P. B. Baltes & M. M. Baltes (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Baltes, P. B., & Mayer, K. U. (Eds.). (1999). The berlin aging study: Aging from 70 to 100. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 163–175. doi:10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00
  • Batson, C. D., Batson, J. G., Slingsby, J. K., Harrell, K. L., Peekna, H. M., & Todd, R. M. (1991). Empathic joy and the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 413–426. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.413
  • Beadle, J. N., & De la Vega, C. E. (2019). Impact of aging on empathy: Review of psychological and neural mechanisms. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 331. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00331
  • Beadle, J. N., Sheehan, A. H., Dahlben, B., & Gutchess, A. H. (2015). Aging, empathy, and prosociality. The Journals of Gerontology Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 70(2), 213–222. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbt091
  • Blanke, E. S., & Riediger, M. (2019). Reading thoughts and feelings in other people: Empathic accuracy across adulthood. Progress in Brain Research, 247, 305–327.
  • Cao, S., Liu, X., & Wu, H. (2021). Controllable empathy? The adjustability of empathy from a top-down view. Advances in Psychological Science, 29(8), 1420–1429. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021.01420
  • Craik, F. I. (1986). A functional account of age differences in memory. Human Memory and Cognitive Capabilities: Mechanisms and Performances, 5, 409–422.
  • Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
  • Davis, C. M. (1990). What is empathy, and can empathy be taught? Physical Therapy, 70(11), 707–711. doi:10.1093/ptj/70.11.707
  • Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 71–100. doi:10.1177/1534582304267187
  • Dziobek, I., Rogers, K., Fleck, S., Bahnemann, M., Heekeren, H. R., Wolf, O. T., & Convit, A. (2008). Dissociation of cognitive and emotional empathy in adults with Asperger syndrome using the Multifaceted Empathy Test (MET). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(3), 464–473. doi:10.1007/s10803-007-0486-x
  • Eisenberg, N., & Eggum, N. D. (2009). Empathic responding: Sympathy and personal distress. The Social Neuroscience of Empathy, 6, 71–830.
  • Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1990). Empathy: Conceptualization, measurement, and relation to prosocial behavior. Motivation and Emotion, 14(2), 131–149. doi:10.1007/BF00991640
  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
  • Fei, H. T., Chang, T. I., Cooper, P. L., & Redfield, M. P. (1975). Earthbound China. Chicago, CHI: University of Chicago Press.
  • Germain, C. M., & Hess, T. M. (2007). Motivational influences on controlled processing: Moderating distractibility in older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 14(5), 462–486. doi:10.1080/13825580600611302
  • German, T. P., & Hehman, J. A. (2006). Representational and executive selection resources in ‘theory of mind’: Evidence from compromised belief-desire reasoning in old age. Cognition, 101(1), 129–152. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.05.007
  • Girardi, A., Sala, S. D., & MacPherson, S. E. (2018). Theory of mind and the ultimatum game in healthy adult aging. Experimental Aging Research, 44(3), 246–257. doi:10.1080/0361073X.2018.1449590
  • Gould, O. N., & MacNeil Gautreau, S. (2014). Empathy and conversational enjoyment in younger and older adults. Experimental Aging Research, 40(1), 60–80. doi:10.1080/0361073X.2014.857559
  • Hess, T. M. (2006). Adaptive aspects of social cognitive functioning in adulthood: Age–related goal and knowledge influences. Social cognition, 24(3), 279–309. doi:10.1521/soco.2006.24.3.279
  • Hess, T. M. (2014). Selective engagement of cognitive resources: Motivational influences on older adults’ cognitive functioning. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(4), 388–407. doi:10.1177/1745691614527465
  • Hess, T. M., & Emery, L. (2012). Memory in context: The impact of age-related goals on performance. In M. Naveh-Benjamin & N. Ohta (Eds.), Memory and aging (pp. 195–226). London: Psychology Press.
  • Hess, T. M., Emery, L., & Neupert, S. D. (2012). Longitudinal relationships between resources, motivation, and functioning. The Journals of Gerontology Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67(3), 299–308. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbr100
  • Hess, T. M., Germain, C. M., Rosenberg, D. C., Leclerc, C. M., & Hodges, E. A. (2005). Aging-related selectivity and susceptibility to irrelevant affective information in the construction of attitudes. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 12(2), 149–174. doi:10.1080/13825580590925170
  • Hess, T. M., Germain, C. M., Swaim, E. L., & Osowski, N. L. (2009). Aging and selective engagement: The moderating impact of motivation on older adults’ resource utilization. The Journals of Gerontology Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64(4), 447–456. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbp020
  • Huang, Y., & Su, Y. (2012). Lifelong development of empathy: A two-process perspective. Psychological Development and Education, 28(4), 434–441.
  • Hunter, M. S., Gentry‐maharaj, A., Ryan, A., Burnell, M., Lanceley, A., Fraser, L., Jacobs, I, & Menon, U. (2012). Prevalence, frequency and problem rating of hot flushes persist in older postmenopausal women: Impact of age, body mass index, hysterectomy, hormone therapy use, lifestyle and mood in a cross‐sectional cohort study of 10 418 British women aged 54–65. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 119(1), 40–50. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03166.x
  • Hurlemann, R., Patin, A., Onur, O. A., Cohen, M. X., Baumgartner, T., Metzler, S., & Kendrick, K. M. (2010). Oxytocin enhances amygdala-dependent, socially reinforced learning and emotional empathy in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(14), 4999–5007. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5538-09.2010
  • Isaacowitz, D. M., & Stanley, J. T. (2011). Bringing an ecological perspective to the study of aging and recognition of emotional facial expressions: Past, current, and future methods. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 35(4), 261–278. doi:10.1007/s10919-011-0113-6
  • Kelly, M., McDonald, S., & Wallis, K. (2022). Empathy across the ages: “I may be older but I’m still feeling it”. Neuropsychology, 36(2), 116–127. doi:10.1037/neu0000783
  • Khanjani, Z., Mosanezhad Jeddi, E., Hekmati, I., Khalilzade, S., Etemadi Nia, M., Andalib, M., & Ashrafian, P. (2015). Comparison of cognitive empathy, emotional empathy, and social functioning in different age groups. Australian Psychologist, 50(1), 80–85. doi:10.1111/ap.12099
  • Lamm, C., & Majdandžić, J. (2015). The role of shared neural activations, mirror neurons, and morality in empathy–a critical comment. Neuroscience Research, 90, 15–24. doi:10.1016/j.neures.2014.10.008
  • Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 255–275. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.255
  • Liu, C., Wang, Y., Yu, G., & Wang, J. (2009). Related theories and exploration on dynamic model of empathy. Advances in Psychological Science, 17(5), 964–972.
  • Luszcz, M. (2011). Executive function and cognitive aging. In K. W. Schaie & S. L. Willis (Eds,), Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 59–72). San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Maylor, E. A., Moulson, J. M., Muncer, A. M., & Taylor, L. A. (2002). Does performance on theory of mind tasks decline in old age? British Journal of Psychology, 93(4), 465–485. doi:10.1348/000712602761381358
  • Phillips, L. H., MacLean, R. D., & Allen, R. (2002). Age and the understanding of emotions: Neuropsychological and sociocognitive perspectives. The Journals of Gerontology Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57(6), 526–530. doi:10.1093/geronb/57.6.P526
  • Preston, S. D., & De Waal, F. B. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(1), 1–20. doi:10.1017/S0140525X02000018
  • Preston, S. D., & Hofelich, A. J. (2012). The many faces of empathy: Parsing empathic phenomena through a proximate, dynamic-systems view of representing the other in the self. Emotion Review, 4(1), 24–33. doi:10.1177/1754073911421378
  • Rauers, A., Blanke, E., & Riediger, M. (2013). Everyday empathic accuracy in younger and older couples: Do you need to see your partner to know his or her feelings? Psychological Science, 24(11), 2210–2217. doi:10.1177/0956797613490747
  • Reynolds, J. R., West, R., & Braver, T. (2009). Distinct neural circuits support transient and sustained processes in prospective memory and working memory. Cerebral Cortex, 19(5), 1208–1221. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn164
  • Richter, D., & Kunzmann, U. (2011). Age differences in three facets of empathy: Performance-based evidence. Psychology and Aging, 26(1), 60–70. doi:10.1037/a0021138
  • Rong, X., Sun, B. H., Huang, X. Z., Cai, M. Y., & Li, W. J. (2010). Reliabilities and validities of Chinese version of interpersonal reactivity index. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 18(2), 158–160.
  • Ruffman, T., Halberstadt, J., Murray, J., Jack, F., Vater, T., & Isaacowitz, D. (2020). Empathic accuracy: Worse recognition by older adults and less transparency in older adult expressions compared with young adults. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(8), 1658–1667. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbz008
  • Ruffman, T., Henry, J. D., Livingstone, V., & Phillips, L. H. (2008). A meta-analytic review of emotion recognition and aging: Implications for neuropsychological models of aging. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 32(4), 863–881. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.01.001
  • Ruitenberg, M. F., Santens, P., & Notebaert, W. (2020). Cognitive and affective theory of mind in healthy aging. Experimental Aging Research, 46(5), 382–395. doi:10.1080/0361073X.2020.1802980
  • Smith, B. T., & Hess, T. M. (2015). The impact of motivation and task difficulty on resource engagement: Differential influences on cardiovascular responses of young and older adults. Motivation Science, 1(1), 22–36. doi:10.1037/mot0000012
  • Stanley, J. T., & Isaacowitz, D. M. (2011). Age-related differences in profiles of mood-change trajectories. Developmental Psychology, 47(2), 318–330. doi:10.1037/a0021023
  • Stanley, J. T., & Isaacowitz, D. M. (2015). Caring more and knowing more reduces age-related differences in emotion perception. Psychology and Aging, 30(2), 383–295. doi:10.1037/pag0000028
  • Sullivan, S., & Ruffman, T. (2004). Emotion recognition deficits in the elderly. The International Journal of Neuroscience, 114(3), 403–432. doi:10.1080/00207450490270901
  • Sze, J. A., Gyurak, A., Goodkind, M. S., & Levenson, R. W. (2012). Greater emotional empathy and prosocial behavior in late life. Emotion, 12(5), 1129–1140. doi:10.1037/a0025011
  • Wieck, C., & Kunzmann, U. (2015). Age differences in empathy: Multidirectional and context-dependent. Psychology and Aging, 30(2), 407–419. doi:10.1037/a0039001
  • Wieck, C., & Kunzmann, U. (2017). Age differences in emotion recognition: A question of modality? Psychology and Aging, 32(5), 401–411. doi:10.1037/pag0000178
  • Zhang, X., Fung, H. H., Stanley, J. T., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Ho, M. Y. (2013). Perspective taking in older age revisited: A motivational perspective. Developmental Psychology, 49(10), 1848–1858. doi:10.1037/a0031211
  • Zhu, Y., Chen, X., Wu, X., & Wu, X. (2018). The multifaceted empathy test scale: Development,reliability and validity. Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Anhui, 53(7), 1100–1105.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.