Exploring Effects of Age on Conflict Processing in the Light of Practice in a Large-Scale Dataset

References

• Allen, P. A., Hall, R. J., Druley, J. A., Smith, A. F., Sanders, R. E., & Murphy, M. D. (2001). How shared are age-related influences on cognitive and noncognitive variables? Psychology and Aging, 16(3), 532–549. doi:10.1037//0882-7974.16.3.532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, P. A., Lien, M. C., Murphy, M. D., Sanders, R. E., Judge, K. S., & McCann, R. S. (2002). Age differences in overlapping-task performance: Evidence for efficient parallel processing in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 17(3), 505–519. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.17.3.505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrés, P., Guerrini, C., Phillips, L. H., & Perfect, T. J. (2008). Differential effects of aging on executive and automatic inhibition. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33(2), 101–123. doi:10.1080/87565640701884212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aschenbrenner, A. J., & Balota, D. A. (2015). Interactive effects of working memory and trial history on Stroop interference in cognitively healthy aging. Psychology and Aging, 30(1), 102–160. doi:10.4324/9781315628097-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augustinova, M., Clarys, D., Spatola, N., & Ferrand, L. (2018). Some further clarifications on age-related differences in Stroop interference. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(2), 767–774. doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1427-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aust, F., & Barth, M. (2020). papaja: Create APA manuscripts with R Markdown. https://github.com/crsh/papaja
   Google Scholar
• Bugg, J. M., DeLosh, E. L., Davalos, D. B., & Davis, H. P. (2007). Age differences in stroop interference: Contributions of general slowing and task-specific deficits. Aging, Neuropsychology & Cognition, 14(2), 155–167. doi:10.1080/138255891007065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burca, M., Chausse, P., Ferrand, L., Parris, B. A., & Augustinova, M. (2022). Some further clarifications on age-related differences in the Stroop task: New evidence from the two-to-one Stroop paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29(2), 1–36. doi:10.3758/s13423-021-02011-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. D. (2017). Cognitive control: Core constructs and current considerations. In T. Egner (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of cognitive control (pp. 3–28). Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118920497.ch1
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, N. B., Dustman, R. E., & Bradford, D. C. (1984). Age-related decrements in Stroop color test performance. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40(5), 1244–1250. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198409)40:5<1244:AID-JCLP2270400521>3.0.CO;2-D
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comalli, P. E., Wapner, S., & Werner, H. (1962). Interference effects of Stroop color-word test in childhood, adulthood, and aging. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 100(1), 47–53. doi:10.1080/00221325.1962.10533572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, R., Liang, C. -C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 20(4), 731–750. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Annals of Statistics, 7(1), 1–26. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erb, C. D., Touron, D. R., & Marcovitch, S. (2020). Tracking the dynamics of global and competitive inhibition in early and late adulthood: Evidence from the flanker task. Psychology and Aging, 35(5), 729–743. doi:10.1037/pag0000435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16(1), 143–149. doi:10.3758/BF03203267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fennell, A., & Ratcliff, R. (2019). Does response modality influence conflict? Modelling vocal and manual response Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 45(11), 2098–2119. doi:10.1037/xlm0000689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gajdos, T., Servant, M., Hasbroucq, T., & Davranche, K. (2020). A measure of the interference effect distribution. Behavior Research Methods, 52(4), 1629–1639. doi:10.3758/s13428-019-01339-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hübner, R., Steinhauser, M., & Lehle, C. (2010). A dual-stage two-phase model of selective attention. Psychological Review, 117(3), 759–784. doi:10.1037/a0019471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. D., & Balota, D. A. (2013). Age-related changes in attentional selection: Quality of task set or degradation of task set across time? Psychology and Aging, 28(3), 744–753. doi:10.1037/a0033159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampit, A., Hallock, H., Valenzuela, M., & Gandy, S. (2014). Computerized cognitive training in cognitively healthy older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of effect modifiers. PLoS Medicine, 11(11), e1001756. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, K. Z. H., & Bosman, E. A. (1996). Age differences in Stroop-like interference as a function of semantic relatedness. Aging, Neuropsychology & Cognition, 3(4), 272–284. doi:10.1080/13825589608256630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lien, M. C., Allen, P. A., Ruthruff, E., Grabbe, J., McCann, R. S., & Remington, R. W. (2006). Visual word recognition without central attention: Evidence for greater automaticity with advancing age. Psychology and Aging, 21(3), 431–447. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.3.431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittelstädt, V., & Miller, J. (2020). Beyond mean reaction times: Combining distributional analyses with processing stage manipulations in the Simon task. Cognitive Psychology, 119, 101275. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicosia, J., & Balota, D. (2020). Age differences in cross-task bleeding. Psychology and Aging, 102–160. doi:10.4324/9781315628097-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panek, P. E., Rush, M. C., & Slade, L. A. (1984). Locus of the age-Stroop interference relationship. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 145(2), 209–216. doi:10.1080/00221325.1984.10532268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parris, B. A., Hasshim, N., Wadsley, M., Augustinova, M., & Ferrand, L. (2022). The loci of Stroop effects: A critical review of methods and evidence for levels of processing contributing to color-word Stroop effects and the implications for the loci of attentional selection. Psychological Research, 86(4), 1029–1053. doi:10.1007/s00426-021-01554-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratte, M. S., Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., & Feng, C. (2010). Exploring the differences in distributional properties between Stroop and Simon effects using delta plots. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(7), 2013–2025. doi:10.3758/APP.72.7.2013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85(2), 59–108. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.2.59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 446–461. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2015). Aging effects in item and associative recognition memory for pictures and words. Psychology and Aging, 30(3), 669–674. doi:10.1037/pag0000030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rey-Mermet, A., & Gade, M. (2018). Inhibition in aging: What is preserved? What declines? A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(5), 1695–1716. doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1384-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridderinkhof, K. R., Wildenberg, W. P. M. V. D., Wijnen, J., & Burle, B. (2004). Response inhibition in conflict tasks is revealed in delta plots. In M. Posner (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of attention (pp. 369–377). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sala, G., & Gobet, F. (2019). Cognitive training does not enhance general cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(1), 9–20. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103(3), 403–428. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, W., & Miller, J. (2012). Response time models of delta plots with negative-going slopes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(4), 555–574. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0254-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Servant, M., & Evans, N. J. (2020). A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging in the flanker task. Psychology and Aging, 35(6), 831–849. doi:10.1037/pag0000546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, D. J., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., Gathercole, S. E., Chabris, C. F., Hambrick, D. Z., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2016). Do “brain-training” programs work? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Supplement, 17(3), 103–186. doi:10.1177/1529100616661983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, J. R., & Small, A. M. (1969). Processing auditory information: Interference from an irrelevant cue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53(5), 433–435. doi:10.1037/h0028034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spieler, D. H., Balota, D. A., & Faust, M. E. (1996). Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 22(2), 461–479. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.22.2.461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643–662. doi:10.1037/h0054651
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R., Schröter, H., Leuthold, H., & Birngruber, T. (2015). Automatic and controlled stimulus processing in conflict tasks: Superimposed diffusion processes and delta functions. Cognitive Psychology, 78, 148–174. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of Census. (1952). Population of the United States, by age: 1950. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce. https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1950/pc-14/pc-14-05.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of Census. (2019). Population by age and sex: 2019. https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2019/demo/age-and-sex/2019-age-sex-composition.html
   Google Scholar
• Verhaeghen, P., & De Meersman, L. (1998). Aging and the Stroop effect: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 13(1), 120–126. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.13.1.120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, R., & Alain, C. (2000). Age-related decline in inhibitory control contributes to the increased Stroop effect observed in older adults. Psychophysiology, 37(2), 179–189. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3720179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, R., & Baylis, G. C. (1998). Effects of increased response dominance and contextual disintegration on the Stroop interference effect in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 13(2), 206–217. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.13.2.206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, B. W. (1969). Interference in identifying attributes and attribute names. Perception & Psychophysics, 6(3), 166–168. doi:10.3758/BF03210086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, C. N., Ratcliff, R., & Starns, J. J. (2011). Diffusion models of the flanker task: Discrete versus gradual attentional selection. Cognitive Psychology, 63(4), 210–238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L. D., François, R. … Yutani, H. (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), 1686. doi:10.21105/joss.01686
   Google Scholar
• Wildenberg, W. P. M. V. D., Wylie, S. A., Forstmann, B. U., Burle, B., Hasbroucq, T., & Richard Ridderinkhof, K. (2010). To head or to heed? Beyond the surface of selective action inhibition: A review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4(December), 1–13. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00222
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolf, D., Zschutschke, L., Scheurich, A., Schmitz, F., Lieb, K., Tüscher, O., & Fellgiebel, A. (2014). Age-related increases in Stroop interference: Delineation of general slowing based on behavioral and white matter analyses. Human Brain Mapping, 35(5), 2448–2458. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanto, T. P., & Gazzaley, A. (2017). Cognitive control and the ageing brain. In T. Egner (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of cognitive control (pp. 476–490). Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118920497.ch27
   Google Scholar