A Data-Generation Process for Data with Specified Risk Differences or Numbers Needed to Treat

References

• Austin , P. C. ( 2007 ). The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios . Statistics in Medicine 26 : 3078 – 3094 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin , P. C. ( 2008 ). The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating relative risks . Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 61 : 537 – 545 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin , P. C. ( 2010 ). Absolute risk reductions, relative risks, relative risk reductions, and numbers needed to treat can be obtained from a logistic regression model . Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 63 : 2 – 6 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin , P. C. ( 2010 ). Different measures of treatment effect for different research questions (Response) . Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 63 : 9 – 10 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Austin , P. C. , Mamdani , M. M. ( 2006 ). A comparison of propensity score methods: a case-study estimating the effectiveness of post-AMI statin use . Statistics in Medicine 25 : 2084 – 2106 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin , P. C. , Stafford , J. ( 2008 ). The performance of two data-generation processes for data with specified marginal treatment odds ratios . Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation 37 : 1039 – 1051 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin , P. C. , Mamdani , M. M. , Stukel , T. A. , Anderson , G. M. , Tu , J. V. ( 2005 ). The use of the propensity score for estimating treatment effects: administrative versus clinical data . Statistics in Medicine 24 : 1563 – 1578 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin , P. C. , Grootendorst , P. , Anderson , G. M. (2007a). A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study. Statistics in Medicine 26:734–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin , P. C. , Grootendorst , P. , Normand , S. L. T. , Anderson , G. M. ( 2007b ). Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: a Monte Carlo study . Statistics in Medicine 26 : 754 – 768 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender , R. , Blettner , M. ( 2002 ). Calculating the “number needed to be exposed” with adjustment for confounding variables in epidemiological studies . Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 55 : 525 – 530 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender , R. , Kuss , O. ( 2010 ). Methods to calculate relative risks, risk differences, and numbers needed to treat from logistic regression (Letter) . Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 63 : 7 – 8 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bender , R. , Augustin , T. , Blettner , M. ( 2005 ). Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models . Statistics in Medicine 24 : 1713 – 1723 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender , R. , Kuss , O. , Hildebrandt , M. , Gehrmann , U. ( 2007 ). Estimating adjusted NNT measures in logistic regression analysis . Statistics in Medicine 26 : 5586 – 5595 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyersmann , J. , Latouche , A. , Bucholz , A. , Schumacher , M. ( 2009 ). Simulating competing risks data in survival data . Statistics in Medicine 28 : 956 – 971 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook , R. J. , Sackett , D. L. ( 1995 ). The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect . British Medical Journal 310 : 452 – 454 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenland , S. ( 1987 ). Interpretation and choice of effect measures in epidemiologic analyses . American Journal of Epidemiology 125 : 761 – 768 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• http://resources.bmj.com/bmj/authors/types-of-article/research. Site accessed March 27, 2008 .
   Google Scholar
• Imbens , G. W. ( 2004 ). Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: a review . The Review of Economics and Statistics 86 : 4 – 29 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeschke , R. , Guyatt , G. , Shannon , H. , Walter , S. , Cook , D. , Heddle , N. ( 1995 ). Basis statistics for clinicians 3: assessing the effects of treatment: measures of association . Canadian Medical Association Journal 152 : 351 – 357 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leemis , L. M. , Shih , L. H. , Reynertson , K. ( 1990 ). Variate generation for accelerated life and proportional hazards models with time dependent covariates . Statistics and Probability Letters 10 : 335 – 339 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Localio , A. R , Margolis , D. J , Berlin , J. A. ( 2007 ). Relative risks and confidence intervals were easily computed indirectly from multivariable logistic regression . Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 60 : 874 – 882 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunn , A. D. , Davies , S. J. ( 1998 ). A note on generating correlated binary variables . Biometrika 85 : 487 – 490 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNutt , L. A. , Wu , C. , Xue , X. , Hafner , J. P. ( 2003 ). Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes . American Journal of Epidemiology 157 : 940 – 943 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monahan , J. F. ( 2001 ). Numerical Methods of Statistics . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• R Core Development Team . ( 2005 ). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing . Vienna : R Foundation for Statistical Computing .
   Google Scholar
• Ripley , D. B. ( 2005 ). Computer-intensive methods . In: Armitage , P. , Colton , T. , eds. Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. , 2nd ed. Chicester : John Wiley & Sons Ltd .
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum , P. R. , Rubin , D. B. ( 1983 ). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects . Biometrika 70 : 41 – 55 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum , P. R. , Rubin , D. B. ( 1984 ). Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score . Journal of the American Statistical Association 79 : 516 – 524 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackett , D. L. , Deeks , J. J. , Altman , D. G. ( 1996 ). Down with odds ratios! Evidence-Based Medicine 1 : 164 – 166 .
   Google Scholar
• Schechtman , E. (2002). Odds ratio, relative risk, absolute risk reduction, and the number needed to treat – which of these should we use? Value in Health 5:431–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair , J. C. , Bracken , M. B. ( 1994 ). Clinically useful measures of effect in binary analyses of randomized trials . Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 47 : 881 – 889 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang , J. , Yu , K. F. ( 1998 ). What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes . Journal of the American Medical Association 280 : 1690 – 1691 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar