29
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Exact and approximate distributions of the chi-square statistic for equiprobability

, , &
Pages 131-149 | Published online: 27 Jun 2007

References

  • Abramowitz, M., and Stegun, I., 1964. Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Washington: National Bureau of Standards; 1964.
  • Chapman, J. W., 1976. A comparison of the X2,-2 log R and multinomial probability criteria for significance tests when expected frequencies are small, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc 71 (1976), pp. 63–854.
  • Cochran, W. G., 1952. The x2 test of goodness of fit, Ann. Math. Statist 23 (1952), pp. 45–315.
  • Fisher, R. A., 1970. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd; 1970.
  • Fisher, R. A., Thornton, H. G., and Mackenzie, W. A., 1922. The accuracy of the plating method of estimating the density of bacterial populations, Ann. Appl. Biol 9 (1922), pp. 59–325.
  • Good, I. J., Gover, T.N., and Mitchell, G. J., 1970. Exact distributions for X and for the likelihood ratio statistic for the equiprobable multinomial distribution, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc 65 (1970), pp. 83–267.
  • Haldane, J. B. S., 1937. The exact value of the moments of the distribution of x2, used as a test of goodness of fit, Biometrika 29 (1937), pp. 43–133.
  • .
  • Katti, S. K., 1973. Exact distribution for the chi square test in the one way table, Comm. Statist 2 (1973), pp. 47–435.
  • Kempthorne, 0., 1966. The classical problem of inference- goodness of fit. Presented at Proc, 5th Berkeley Symp, Math. Statist. Prob.(J, Neyman, Ed.).
  • Kendall, M. G., and Stuart, A., 1973. "The Advanced Theory of Statistics". In: Inference and Relationship. Vol. 2. New York: Hafner; 1973.
  • Lancaster, H. 0., 1969. The Chi Squared Distribution. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc; 1969.
  • Larntz, K., 1978. Small-sample comparisons of exact levels for chi-squared goodness-of-fit statistics, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc 73 (1978), pp. 63–253.
  • Lehmer, D. H., 1964. "The machine tools of combinatorics". In: Beckenbach, E. F., ed. Applied Combinatorial Mathematics. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc; 1964. pp. 5!–31.
  • Nass, C. A. G., 1959. The x2 test for small expectations in contingency tables, with special reference to accidents and absenteeism, Biometrika 46 (1959), pp. 85–365.
  • Pearson, K., 1900. "On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling". In: Phil. Mag. Vol. 50. 1900. pp. 72–157, Ser. 5.
  • Radlow, R., and Alf, E. F., 1975. An alternate multinomial assessment of the accuracy of the x2 test of goodness of fit, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc 70 (1975), pp. 3–811.
  • Rao, C. R., and Chakravarti, I. M., 1956. Some small sample tests of significance for a Poisson distribution, Biometrics 12 (1956), pp. 82–264.
  • Roscoe, J. T., and Byers, J. A., 1971. An investigation of the restraints with respect to sample size commonly imposed on the use of the chi-square statistic, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc 66 (1971), pp. 9–755.
  • Slakter, M. J., 1965. A comparison of the Pearson chi-square and Kolmogorov goodness-of-fit tests with respect to validity, J, Amer. Statist. Assoc 60 (1965), pp. 8–854.
  • Tate, M. W., and Hyer, L. A., 1973. Inaccuracy of the X test of goodness of fit when expected frequencies are small, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc 68 (1973), pp. 41–836.
  • Vessereau, A., 1958. Sur les conditions d'application du criterium x2 de Pearson, Bull. Inst. Int. Statist 36 (1958), pp. 87–101.
  • Wise, M. E., 1963. Multinomial probabilities and the x2 and X2 distributions, Biometrika 50 (1963), pp. 54–145.
  • Yarnold, J. K., 1970. The minimum expectation in X goodness of fit tests and the accuracy of approximations for the null distribution, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc 65 (1970), pp. 86–864.
  • Yates, F., 1934. Contingency tables involving small numbers and the x2 test, J. R. Statist. Soc. Supp 1 (1934), pp. 35–217.
  • Zahn, D. A., and Roberts, G. C., 1971. Exact x2 criterion tables with cell expectations one: an application to Coleman's measure of consensus, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc 66 (1971), pp. 48–145.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.