A Design of Attributes Double Sampling Plans for Three-class Products

References

• Balamurali, S., Park, H., Jun, C.H., Kim, K.J., Lee, J. (2005). Designing of variables repetitive group sampling plan involving minimum average sampling number. Communications in statistics- simulation and computation 34:799–809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebbington, M., Govindaraju, K., DeSilva, N., Volz, R. (2000). Acceptance sampling and practical issues in procurement inspection of apples. ASA Proceedings of the Section on Quality and Productivity 104–109.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, D.F., Lyon, D.A., Burr, I.W. (1973). Three class attributes plans in acceptance sampling. Technometrics 15(3):575–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P.A. (1984). A Three-Class Procedure for Acceptance Sampling by Variables. Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis, University of Guelph, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Guelph.
   Google Scholar
• Cassady, C.R., Nachlas, J.A. (2003). Evaluating and implementing 3-level acceptance sampling plans. Quality Engineering 15(3):361–369.
   Google Scholar
• Cassady C.R., Nachlas J.A. (2006), Evaluating and implementing 3-level control charts. Quality Engineering 18(3):285–292.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, J. (1978). Standards and sampling plans for product safety. In: ASQC Technical Conference Transactions. pp. 483–490. Milwaukee: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, J. (1979). Three-class attribute sampling plans. In: ASQC Technical Conference Transactions. pp.264–271. Houston: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, J. (1980) Three-class attribute sampling plans-continued. In: ASQC Technical Conference Transactions. pp. 475–482. Atlanta: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, J. (1983). Trinomial sampling plans to match MIL-STD-105D. In: ASQC Technical Conference Transactions. pp. 256–264. Boston: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Dahms, S., Hildebrandt, G. (1998). Some remarks on the design of three-class sampling plans. Journal of Food Protection 61(6):757–761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICMSF. (1986). Sampling for microbiological analysis: principles and specific applications. In: Microorganisms in Foods, book 2. ed2nd. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. (1999). ISO 2589-1:1999. Sampling Procedures for Inspection by Attributes-Part 1: Sampling Schemes Indexed by Acceptance Quality Limit (AQL) for Lot-by-lot Inspection. Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• Legan, J.D., Vandeven, M.H., Dahms, S., Cole, M.B. (2001). Determining the concentration of microorganisms controlled by attributes sampling plans. Food Control 12:137–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, F.Y., Cui, L.R. (2013). A design of attributes single sampling plans for three-class products. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management 10(4):369–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D.C. (2005). Introduction to Statistical Quality Control. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, A.G., Wells, L.J., Woodall, W.H. (2011). Methods for monitoring multiple proportions when inspecting continuously. Journal of Quality Technology 43(3):237–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, D.K., Phatak, A.G. (1977). The maximum likelihood estimation under curtailed three-class attributes plans. Technometrics 19(2):159–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, D.K., Phatak, A.G. (1978). The maximum likelihood estimation under curtailed three class attributes plans – curtailed as well as uncurtailed. Metron 36:99–118.
   Google Scholar
• Topalidou, E., Psarakis, S. (2009). Review of multinomial and multiattribute quality control charts. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 25(7):773–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Defense. (1963). MIL-STD-105D: Military Standard: Sampling Procedures and Tables for Inspection by Attributes. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, C.W. (2012). An efficient inspection scheme for variables based on Taguchi capability index. European Journal of Operational Research 223(1):116–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar