Bayesian variable selection in Poisson change-point regression analysis

References

• Barry, D., Hartigan, J. A. (1992). Product partition models for change point problems. Annals of Statistics 20:260–279.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, D., Hartigan, J. A. (1993). A Bayesian analysis for change point problems. Journal of American Statistical Association 88:309–319.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P. J., Vannucci, M., Fearn, T. (1998). Multivariate Bayesian variable selection and prediction. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B 60:627–641.
   Google Scholar
• Carlin, B. P., Gelfand, A. E., Smith, A. F. M. (1992). Hierarchical Bayesian analysis of changepoint problems. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series C 41:389–405.
   Google Scholar
• Chib, S. (1998). Estimation and comparison of multiple change-point models. Journal of Econometrics 86:221–241.
   Google Scholar
• Chib, S., Greenberg, E. (1994). Bayes inference in regression models with ARMA(p, q) errors. Journal of Econometrics 64:183–206.
   Google Scholar
• Chib, S., Greenberg, E. (1995). Understanding the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. The American Statistician 49:327–335.
   Google Scholar
• Dunson, D. B., Chen, Z. (2004). Selecting factors predictive of heterogeneity in multivariate event time data. Biometrics 60:352–358.
   Google Scholar
• Efroymson, M. A. (1960). Multiple Regression Analysis: Mathematical Methods for Digital Computers. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, J., Li, R. (2001). Variable selection via nonconcave penalized likelihood and its oracle properties. Journal of American Statistical Association 96:1348–1360.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., Rubin, D. B. (1992). Inference from iterative simulations using multiple sequences (with discussion). Statistical Science 7:457–472.
   Google Scholar
• George, E. I., McCulloch, R. E. (1993). Variable selection via Gibbs sampling. Journal of American Statistical Association 88:881–889.
   Google Scholar
• George, E. I., McCulloch, R. E. (1997). Approaches for Bayesian variable selection. Statistica Sinica 7:339–373.
   Google Scholar
• Hoerl, E., Kennard, R. W. (1970). Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics 12:55–67.
   Google Scholar
• Hurvich, C. M., Tsai, C. (1990). The impact of model selection on inference in linear regression. The American Statistician 44:214–217.
   Google Scholar
• Koop, G., Potter, S. (2007). Estimation and forecasting in models with multiple breaks. The Review of Economic Studies 74:763–789.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, F., Paulo, R., Clyde, M. A., Berger, J. O. (2008). Mixtures of g priors for Bayesian variable selection. Journal of American Statistical Association 103:410–423.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J. S. (1994). The collapsed Gibbs sampler in Bayesian computations with applications to gene regulation problems. Journal of American Statistical Association 89:958–966.
   Google Scholar
• Ntzoufras, I., Forster, J. J., Dellaportas, P. (2000). Stochastic search variable selection for log-linear models. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 68:23–37.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, J., Chen, J. (2006). Application of modified information criterion to multiple change point problems. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 97:2221–2241.
   Google Scholar
• Park, T. (2011). Bayesian analysis of individual choice behavior with aggregate data. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 20:158–173.
   Google Scholar
• Park, T., Bae, W. (2014). Bayesian semi-parametric regression for quantile residual lifetime. Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods 21:285–296.
   Google Scholar
• Park, T., Jeong, S. (2015). Efficient Bayesian analysis of multivariate aggregate choices. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 85:3352–3366. DOI:10.1080/00949655.2014.973411.
   Google Scholar
• Park, T., Jeong, J. H., Lee, J. W. (2012). Bayesian nonparametric inference on quantile residual life function: Application to breast cancer data. Statistics in Medicine 31:1972–1985.
   Google Scholar
• Park, T., Krafty, R. T., Sanchez, A. I. (2012). Bayesian semi-parametric analysis of Poisson change-point regression models: Application to policy-making in Cali, Colombia. Journal of Applied Statistics 39:2285–2298.
   Google Scholar
• Park, T., Min, S. (2016). Partially collapsed Gibbs sampling for linear mixed-effects models. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 45:165–180. DOI:10.1080/03610918.2013.857687.
   Google Scholar
• Park, T., van Dyk, D. A. (2009). Partially collapsed Gibbs samplers: Illustrations and applications. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 18:283–305.
   Google Scholar
• Raftery, A. E., Akman, V. E. (1986). Bayesian analysis of a Poisson process with a change-point. Biometrika 73:85–89.
   Google Scholar
• Rencher, A. C., Pun, F. C. (1980). Inflation of R2 in best subset regression. Technometrics 22:49–53.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. F. M. (1975). A Bayesian approach to inference about a change-point in a sequence of random variables. Biometrika 62:407–416.
   Google Scholar
• Tibshirani, R. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B 58:267–288.
   Google Scholar
• van Dyk, D. A., Park, T. (2008). Partially collapsed Gibbs samplers: Theory and methods. Journal of American Statistical Association 103:790–796.
   Google Scholar
• van Dyk, D. A., Park, T. (2011). Partially collapsed Gibbs sampling and path-adaptive Metropolis-Hastings in high-energy astrophysics. In: Brooks, S., Gelman, A., Jones, G., Meng, X.-L., eds. Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, pp. 383–400.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, T. Y., Kuo, L. (2001). Bayesian binary segmentation procedure for a Poisson process with multiple changepoints. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 10:772–785.
   Google Scholar
• Zellner, A. (1986). On assessing prior distributions and Bayesian regression analysis with g-prior distributions. In: Goel, P., Zellner, A., eds. Bayesian Inference and Decision Techniques. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 233–243.
   Google Scholar