Model comparison of linear and nonlinear Bayesian structural equation models with dichotomous data

References

• Akaike, H. (1973). Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle. In: Second international symposium on information theory. Akademinai Kiado. pp. 267–281. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K.-A., Paxton, P. (1998). Interactions of latent variables in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling 5:267–293.
   Google Scholar
• Broemeling, L.-D. (1985). Bayesian Analysis of Linear Models. New York: Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B.-M. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B.-M. (2012). Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New York: Routledge Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, J.-H., Song, X.-Y., Lee, S.-Y. (2008). Bayesian analysis of nonlinear structural equation models with mixed continuous, ordered and unordered categorical, and nonignorable missing data. Statistics and its Interface 1:99–114.
   Google Scholar
• Geman, S., Geman, D. (1984). Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distribution, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (6):721–741.
   Google Scholar
• Geyer, C.J. (1992). Practical Markov Chain Monte Carlo. Statistical Science 7(4):473–511.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, W.-H. (2003). Econometric Analysis. India: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Kass, R.-E., Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90(430):773–795.
   Google Scholar
• Khine, M.-S. (2013). Application of Structural Equation Modeling in Educational Research and Practice. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R.-B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-Y. (2006). Bayesian analysis of nonlinear structural equation models with nonignorable missing data. Psychometrika 71(3):541–564.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-Y., Poon, W.-Y., Bentler, P. (1990). Full maximum likelihood analysis of structural equation models with polytomous variables. Statistics & Probability Letters 9(1):91–97.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-Y., Poon, W.-Y., Bentler, P. M. (1995). A two‐stage estimation of structural equation models with continuous and polytomous variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 48(2):339–358.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-Y., Shi, J.-Q. (2000). Bayesian analysis of structural equation model with fixed covariates. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 7(3):411–430.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-Y., Song, X.-Y. (2002). A Bayesian approach for multigroup nonlinear factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling 9(4):523–553.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-Y., Song, X.-Y. (2003a). Model comparison of nonlinear structural equation models with fixed covariates. Psychometrika 68(1):27–47 .
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-Y., Song, X.-Y. (2003b). Bayesian analysis of structural equation models with dichotomous variables. Statistics in Medicine 22(19):3073–3088.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-Y., Song, X.-Y. (2004a). Evaluation of the Bayesian and maximum likelihood approaches in analysing structural equation models with small sample sizes. Multivariate Behavioral Research 39(4):653–686.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-Y., Song, X.-Y. (2004b). Bayesian analysis of two-level nonlinear structural equation models with continuous and polytomous data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 57:29–52.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-Y., Song, X.-Y. (2012). Basic and Advanced Structural Equation Models for Medical and Behavioural Sciences. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-Y., Song, X.-Y., Cai, J.-H. (2010). A Bayesian approach for nonlinear structural equation models with dichotomous variables using logit and probit links. Structural Equation Modeling 17(2):280–302.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-Y., Song, X.-Y., Tang, N.-S. (2007). Bayesian methods for analysing structural equation models with covariates, interaction, and quadratic latent variables. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 14(3):404–434.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-Y., Tang, N.-S. (2006). Analysis of nonlinear structural equation models with nonignorable missing covariates and ordered categorical data. Statistica Sinica 16(4):1117–1141.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Yang, A. (2011). A Bayesian criterion-based statistic for model selection of structural equation models with ordered categorical data. International Journal of Modeling and Optimization 1(2):151–157.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, B., Song, X.-Y., Li, X.-D. (2012). Bayesian analysis of multi-group nonlinear structural equation models with application to behavioral finance. Quantitative Finance 12(3):477–488.
   Google Scholar
• Lunn, D., Spiegelhalter, D., Thomas, A., Best, N. (2009). The BUGS project: Evolution, critique and future directions. Statistics in medicine 28(25):3049–3067. ISSN 1097-0258.
   Google Scholar
• Lunn, D., Jackson, C., Best, N., Thomas, A., Spiegelhalter, D. (2012). The BUGS book: A practical introduction to Bayesian analysis. London, New York: CRC press. ISBN 1584888490.
   Google Scholar
• Meng, X.-L., Schilling, S. (1996). Fitting full-information item factor models and an empirical investigation of bridge sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association 91(435):1254–1267.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, U. (1979). Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient. Psychometrika 44(4):443–460.
   Google Scholar
• Randall, E., Schumacker, R. G. L. A (2010). Beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. International Statistical Review 79(2):286–287.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (1991). EM and beyond. Psychometrika 56(2):241–254.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacker, R.-E., Marcoulides, G.-A. (1998). Interaction and Nonlinear Effects in Structural Equation Modeling. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Scott Long, J. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Advanced Quantitative Techniques in the Social Sciences 7:188–196.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, J.-Q., Lee, S.-Y. (1998). Bayesian sampling-based approach for factor analysis model with continuous and polytomousdata. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 51:233–252.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, J.-Q., Lee, S.-Y. (2000). Latent variable models with mixed continuous and polytomous data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 62(1):77–87.
   Google Scholar
• Song, X.-Y., and Lee, S.-Y. (2007). Bayesian analysis of latent variable models with nonignorable missing outcomes from exponential family. Statistics in Medicine 26:681–693.
   Google Scholar
• Song, X.-Y., Lu, Z.-H., Hser, Y.-I., Lee, S.-Y. (2011). A Bayesian approach for analysing longitudinal structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 18(2):183–194.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegelhalter, D.-J., Best, N.-G., Carlin, B.-P., Van der Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 64(4):583–639.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegehalter, D.-J., Thomas, A., Best, N.-G., Lunn, D. (2003). WinBUGS User Manual. Cambridge: Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner, M.-A., Wong, W.-H. (1987). The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 82(398):528–540.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Wang, X. (2012). Structural Equation Modeling: Applications Using Mplus. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J.-M. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. London, UK: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, M., Dunson, D.-B. (2010). Bayesian semiparametric structural equation models with latent variables. Psychometrika 75(4):675–693.
   Google Scholar
• Yanuar, F., Ibrahim, K., Jemain, A. A. (2013). Bayesian structural equation modeling for the health index. Journal of Applied Statistics 40(6):1254–1269.
   Google Scholar