A new mixed chain sampling plan based on the process capability index for product acceptance

References

• Aslam, M., Wu, C.W., Azam, M., Jun, C.H. (2013a). Variables sampling inspection for resubmitted lots based on process capability index Cpk for normally distributed items. Applied Mathematical Modelling 37(3):667–675.
   Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., Wu, C.-W., Jun, C.-H., Azam, M., Itay, N.(2013b). Developing a variables repetitive sampling plan based on Cpk with unknown mean and variance. Journal of Statistical Simulation and Computations 83(8):1507–1517.
   Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., Azam, M., Balamurali, S., Jun, C.-H. (2012). A new mixed acceptance sampling plan based on sudden death testing under the Weibull distribution. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers 29(6):427–433.
   Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., Azam, M., Jun,C.-H. (2013c). A mixed repetitive sampling plan based on process capability index. Applied Mathematical Modelling 37(24):10027–10035.
   Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., Wu, C.-W., Azam, M., Jun, C.-H. (2014). Mixed acceptance sampling plans for product inspection using process capability index. Quality Engineering 26(4):450–459.
   Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., Balamurali, S., Azam, M., Srinivasa Rao, G. (2015). Mixed multiple dependent state sampling plans based on process capability index. Journal of Testing and Evaluation 43(1):171– 178.
   Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., Park, H., Jun, C.H., Kim, K.J., Lee, J. (2005). Designing of variables repetitive group sampling plan involving minimum average sample number. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation 34:799–809.
   Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., Jun, C.H. (2011). A new system of skip-lot sampling plans having a provision for reducing normal inspection. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry 27(3):348–363.
   Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., Usha, M. (2013). Optimal designing of variables chain sampling plans by minimizing the average sample number. International Journal of Manufacturing Engineering 2013:12. doi: 10.1155/2013/751807.
   Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., Usha, M. (2014). Optimal designing of variables quick switching system based on the process capability index Cpk. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering 31(2):85–94.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, A.B., Goode, H. P. (1952). Sampling Inspection by Variables. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, L.K., Cheng, S.W., Spiring, F.A. (1988). A new measure of process capability: Cpm. Journal of Quality Technology 20(3):162–175.
   Google Scholar
• Collani, V. E. (1991). A note on acceptance sampling for variables. Metrika 38(1):19–36.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, A. J.(1986). Quality Control and Industrial Statistics. 5th Ed. Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Dodge, H. F.(1955). Chain sampling inspection plan. Industrial Quality Control 11:10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Govindaraju, K., Balamurali, S. (1998). Chain sampling plan for variables inspection. Journal of Applied Statistics 25:103–109.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, G., Resnikoff, G. J. (1955), “Some notes on mixed variables and attributes sampling plans”, Technical Report No.10, Applied Mathematics and Statistics Laboratory, Stanford University, Polo Alto, California, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, Y. C., Pearn, W.L., Pei, C. W. (2008). Capability adjustment for gamma processes with mean shift consideration in implementing Six Sigma program. European Journal of Operational Research 191(2):517–529.
   Google Scholar
• Jun, C-H., Balamurali, S., Lee, S.-H.(2006). Variables sampling plans for Weibull distributed lifetimes under sudden death testing. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 55:53–58.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, V. E. (1986). Process capability indices. Journal of Quality Technology 18:41–52, Corrigenda pp. 265.
   Google Scholar
• Kotz, S., Johnson, N.L.(2002). Process capability indices–A review, 1992–2000. Journal of Quality Technology 34(1):2–19.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Pu, X., Xiang, D. (2011). Mixed variables-attributes test plans for single and double acceptance sampling under exponential distribution. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2011:1–15, Article ID 575036, Doi:10.1155/2011/575036.
   Google Scholar
• MIL-STD-414 (1957). Sampling Procedures and Tables for Inspection by Variables for Percent Defective. Washington, D. C.: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C. (2009). Introduction to Statistical Quality Control. 6th Ed. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Negrin, I., Parmet, Y., Schechtman, E. (2009). Developing a sampling plan based on Cpk. Quality Engineering 21:306–318.
   Google Scholar
• Pearn, W. L., Wu, C. W. (2007). An effective decision making method for product acceptance. Omega-International Journal of Management Science 35:12–21.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, I. R. (1955). “Mixed variables and attributes plans, the exponential case”, Technical Report No.23, Applied Mathematics and Statistics Laboratory, Stanford University, Polo Alto, California, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling, E. G. (1982).Acceptance Sampling in Quality Control. Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York, NY, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling, E. G., Dodge, H. F.(1969). Procedures and tables for evaluating dependent mixed acceptance sampling plans. Technometrics 11(2):341–372.
   Google Scholar
• Soundararajan, V. (1978). Procedures and tables for construction and selection of chain sampling plans (ChSP-1)-part I. Journal of Quality Technology 7:56–60.
   Google Scholar
• Spiring, F., Leung, B., Cheng, S., Yeung, A. (2003). A bibliography of process capability papers. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 19(5):445–460.
   Google Scholar
• Whetherill, G. B., Chiu, W. K. (1975). A review of acceptance sampling schemes with emphasis on the economic aspect. International Statistical Review 43(2):191–210.
   Google Scholar
• Yum, B. J., Kim, K. W. (2011). A bibliography of the literature on process capability indices: 2000–2009. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 27(3):251–268.
   Google Scholar