338
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Critical review and comparison of continuity correction methods: The normal approximation to the binomial distribution

&
Pages 2266-2285 | Received 29 Sep 2016, Accepted 05 Jun 2017, Published online: 31 Jul 2017

References

  • Agresti, A., Coull, B. A. (1998). Approximate is better than “exact” for interval estimation of binomial proportions. The American Statistician 52(2):119–126.
  • Blyth, C. R., Still, H. A. (1983). Binomial confidence intervals. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81:108–116.
  • Brown, L. D., Cai, T. T., DasGupta, A. (2001). Interval estimation for a binomial proportion. Statistical Science 16 (2):101–117.
  • Casella, G., Berger, R. L. (2002). Statistical Inference. 2rd ed. Australia: Duxbury Press.
  • Cox, D. R. (1970). The continuity correction. Biometrika 57:217–219.
  • Cressie, N. (1978). A finely tuned continuity correction. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math 30:435–442.
  • De Moivre, A. (1756). The doctrine of chances. 3rd ed. New York: Chelsea. Third edition, reprinted in 1967. First edition 1718.
  • Duran, R. I., Albin, S. L. (2009). Monitoring a fraction with easy and reliable settings of the false alarm rate. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 25(8):1029–1043.
  • Emura, T., Lin, Y. S. (2015). A comparison of normal approximation rules for attribute control charts. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 31 (No.3):411–418.
  • Everitt, B. (2003). Modern medical statistics: A practical guide. New York: Wiley.
  • Fagerland, M. W., Lydersen, S., Laake, P. (2015). Recommended confidence intervals for two independent binomial proportions. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 24(2):224–254.
  • Feller, W. 1968. An introduction to probability theory and its applications. volume I, 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Haber, M. (1982). The continuity correction and statistical testing. International Statistical Review 50:135–144.
  • Hahn, G. J., Meeker, W. Q. (1991). Statistical intervals: A guide for practitioners. New York: Wiley.
  • Hald, A. (1952). Statistical theory with engineering applications. New York: Wiley.
  • Hald, A. (1978). Statistical theory of sampling inspection. Part 2. Institute of Mathematical Statistics, University of Copenhagen.
  • Hansen, P. (2011). Approximating the binomial distribution by the normal distribution - error and accuracy, U.U.D.M. Project Report 2011:18.
  • Johnson, R. A. (2009). Statistics: Principles and Methods. 6th ed. New York: Wiley.
  • Makri, F. S., Psillakis, Z. M. (2011). On runs of length exceeding a threshold: Normal approximation. Statistical Papers 52(3):531–51.
  • Montgomery, D. C. (2009). Statistical quality control: A modern introduction. 6rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Perondi, M. B. M., Reis, A. G., Paiva, E. F., Nadkarni, V. M., Berg, R. A. 2004. A comparison of high-dose and standard-dose epinephrine in children with cardiac arrest. New England Journal of Medicine 350(17):1722–1730.
  • Pradhan, V., J. C. Evans, Banerjee, T. 2016. Binomial confidence intervals for testing non-inferiority or superiority: a practitioner's dilemma. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 25 (4):1707–1717.
  • Ryan, T. P. (2011). Statistical methods for quality improvement. 3rd ed. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Schader, M., Schmid, F. (1989). Two rules of thumb for the approximation of the binomial distribution by the normal distribution. American Statisticians 43(1):23–24.
  • Schader, M., Schmid, F. (1990). Charting small sample characteristics of asymptotic confidence intervals for the binomial parameter p. Statistical Papers 31:251–64.
  • Wetherill, G. B., Brown, D. W. (1991). Statistical process control: Theory and practice. Chapman and Hall: London.
  • Wilson, E. B. (1927). Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association 22(158):209–12.
  • Yates, F. (1934). Contingency tables involving small numbers, and the χ2 test. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1(2):217–35.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.