Constructing optimal router bit life sequential experimental designs: New results with a case study

References

• Box, G. E. P., W. G. Hunter, and J. S. Hunter. 1978. Statistics for Experiments. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, K., Z. Li, and H. Qin. 2012. Some new lower bounds to centered and wrap-round L2-discrepancies. Statist. Probab. Lett. 82 (7):1367–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheong, K. T. W., K. Htay, R. H. C. Tan, and M. Lim. 2012. Identifying combinatorial growth inhibitory effects of various plant extracts on leukemia cells through systematic experimental design. Amer. J. Plant Sci. 3:1390–98.
   Google Scholar
• Durrieu, G., and L. Briollais. 2009. Sequential design for microarray experiments. J. Amer. Statist. Association 104:650–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsawah, A. M. 2016. Constructing optimal asymmetric united designs via Lee discrepancy. Statist. Probab. Lett. 118:24–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsawah, A. M. 2017a. A closer look at de-aliasing effects using an efficient foldover technique. Statistics 51 (3):532–57.
   Google Scholar
• Elsawah, A. M. 2017b. A powerful and efficient algorithm for breaking the links between aliased effects in asymmetric designs. Aust. N. Z. J. Stat. 59 (1):17–41.
   Google Scholar
• Elsawah, A. M., M. A. Al-awady, M. A. Abd Elgawad, and H. Qin. 2016. A note on optimal foldover four-level factorials. Acta Math. Sinica 32 (3):286–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsawah, A. M., J. Hu, and H. Qin. 2017. Effective lower bounds of wrap-around L2-discrepancy on three-level combined designs. J. Syst. Sci. Complex. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11424-017-6036-5.
   Google Scholar
• Elsawah, A. M., and H. Qin. 2014. New lower bound for centered L2-discrepancy of four-level U-type designs. Statist. Probab. Lett. 93:65–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsawah, A. M., and H. Qin. 2015a. A new strategy for optimal foldover two-level designs. Statist. Probab. Lett. 103:116–26.
   Google Scholar
• Elsawah, A. M., and H. Qin. 2015b. Lee discrepancy on symmetric three-level combined designs. Statist. Probab. Lett. 96:273–80.
   Google Scholar
• Elsawah, A. M., and H. Qin. 2016. An efficient methodology for constructing optimal foldover designs in terms of mixture discrepancy. J. Korean Statist. Soc. 45:77–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsawah, A. M., and H. Qin. 2017. A new look on optimal foldover plans in terms of uniformity criteria. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods. 46 (4):1621–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, K. T., X. Ke, and A. M. Elsawah. 2017. Construction of uniform designs via an adjusted threshold accepting algorithm. J. Complexity 43:28–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, K. T., R. Z. Li, and A. Sudjianto. 2006. Design and modeling for computer experiments. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, K. T., D. K. J. Lin, and H. Qin. 2003. A note on optimal foldover design. Statist. Probab. Lett. 62:245–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, K. T., and R. Mukerjee. 2000. A connection between uniformity and aberration in regular fractions of two-level factorials. Biometrika 87:173–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, K. T., Y. Tang, and J. Yin. 2005. Lower bounds for the wrap-around L2-discrepancy of symmetrical uniform designs. J. Complexity 21:757–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickernell, F. J. 1998a. A generalized discrepancy and quadrature error bound. Math. Comp. 67:299–322.
   Google Scholar
• Hickernell, F. J. 1998b. Lattice rules: How well do they measure up?In Random and Quasi-Random Point Sets. Lecture Notes in Statistics, eds. P. Hellekalek and G. Larcher, vol. 138. pp. 109–66. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ji, Y. B., G. Alaerts, C. J. Xu, Y. Z. Hu, and Y. V. Heyden. 2006. Sequential uniform designs for fingerprints development of Ginkgo biloba extracts by capillary electrophoresis. J. Chromatography A 1128:273–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W., and D. K. J. Lin. 2003. Optimal foldover plans for two-Level fractional factorial designs. Technometrics 45:142–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W., D. K. J. Lin, and K. Q. Ye. 2003. Optimal foldover plans for non-regular orthogonal designs. Technometrics 45:347–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, P. F., M. Q. Liu, and R. C. Zhang. 2005. Choice of optimal initial designs in sequential experiments. Metrika 61 (2):127–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, M. Q., K. T. Fang, and F. J. Hickernell. 2006. Connections among different criteria for asymmetrical fractional factorial designs. Statist. Sinica. 16 (4):1285–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeppky, J. L., L. M. Moore, and B. J. Williams. 2010. Batch sequential designs for computer experiments. J. Statist. Plann. and Inference 140:1452–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, H.-M., W.-D. Ni, W.-D. Liang, and R.-L. Man. 2006. Supercritical CO2 extraction of emodin and physcion from Polygonum cuspidatum and subsequent isolation by semipreparative chromatography. J. Sep. Sci. 29:2136–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C., and G. C. Runger. 1996. Foldover of 2k − p resolution IV experimental designs. Quality Technology 28:446–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou, Z. J., K. Chatterjee, and H. Qin. 2011. Lower bounds of various discrepancies on combined designs. Metrika 74:109–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou, Z. J., H. Qin, and X. Cai. 2014. A lower bound for the wrap-around L2-discrepancy on combined designs of mixed two- and three-level factorials. Communi. Statist. Theory Methods 43:2274–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou, Z. J., H. Qin, and X. Cai. 2015. Optimal foldover plans of three level designs with minimum wrap-around L2-discrepancy. Sci. China Ser. A. 58:1537–48.
   Google Scholar
• Ou, Z., and H. Qin. 2017. Optimal foldover plans of asymmetric factorials with minimum wrap-around L2-discrepancy. Stat. Papers. doi:10.1007/s00362-017-0892-x.
   Google Scholar
• Phadke, M. S. 1986. Design optimization case studies. AT & T Technical Journal 65:51–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, H., K. Chatterjee, and Z. J. Ou. 2013. A lower bound for the centered L2-discrepancy on combined designs under the asymmetric factorials. Statistics 47:992–1002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, F. S., J. Chen, and M. Q. Liu. 2011. Connections between uniformity and aberration in general multi-level factorials. Metrika 73 (3):305–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, C. 2006. Refinement strategies for stratified sampling methods. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 91:1257–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, B., G. M. Robert, and F. B. John. 2010. A note on the selection of optimal foldover plans for 16- and 32-run fractional factorial designs. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 140:1497–1500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., and K. T. Fang. 1981. A note on uniform distribution and experimental design. Chin. Sci. Bull. 26:485–89.
   Google Scholar
• Zhan, Q., Z. Wang, J. Hu, and H. Qin. 2015. A new lower bound for wrap-around L2-discrepancy on two and three mixed level factorials. Statist. Probab. Lett. 96:133–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y. D., and J. H. Ning. 2008. Lower bounds of the wrap-around L2-discrepancy and relationships between MLHD and uniform design with a large size. J. Stat. Plan. Inference 138:2330–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar