Factors causing occurrence of artificial dif: A simulation study for dichotomous data

References

• Andrich, D. and Hagquist, C. 2012. Real and artificial Differential Item Functioning. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 37 (3):387–416. doi: 10.3102/1076998611411913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrich, D., and C., Hagquist. 2014. Real and artificial differential item functioning in polytomous items. Educational and Psychological Measurement 75 (2):185–207. doi:10.1177/0013164414534258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camilli, G., and L. A., Shepard. 1994. Methods for identifying biased test items (volume 4). California: SAGE Publications. Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Clauser, B. E., and K. M., Mazor. 1998. Using statistical procedures to identify differential item functioning test items. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 17:31–44. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.1998.tb00619.x.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, G. H.. 1993. Notes on the Mantel-Haenszel procedure and another chi squared test for the assessment of DIF. Methodika 7, 88–100.
   Google Scholar
• Hagquist, C., and D., Andrich. 2015. Determinants of artificial DIF–A study based on simulated polytomous data. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling 57 (3):342–376.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, P. W., and D. T., Thayer. 1988. Differential item performance and the Mantel Haenszel procedure. In H. Wainer and H. I. Braun (Eds.), Test validity (pp. 129–145). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C.. 1993. A note on the value of including the studied item in the test score when analyzing test items for DIF. In P. W. Holland and H. Wainer (Eds.), Differential item functioning (pp. 317–319). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Mantel, N., and W., Haenszel. 1959. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Journal of Nat. Cancer Inst. 22:719–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith, W., and R. E., Millsap. 1992. On the misuse of manifest variables in the detection of measurement bias. Psychometrika 57:289–311. doi:10.1007/BF02294510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millsap, R. E., and W., Meredith. 1992. Inferential conditions in the statistical detection of measurement bias. Applied Psychological Measurement 16:389402. doi:10.1177/014662169201600411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parshall, C. G., and T. Miller. 1995. Exact Versus Asymptotic Mantel-Haenszel DIF Statistics: A Comparison of Performance under Small-Sample Conditions. Journal of Educational Measurement 32 (3):302–316. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1995.tb00469.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant, A. and J. F. Pallant. 2007. DIF matters: A practical approach to test if Differential Item Functioning makes a difference. Rasch Measurement Transactions 20 (4):1082–84.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, C. M.. 2011. What's the DIF? why differential item functioning analyses are an important part of instrument development and validation. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 29:364 63. doi:10.1177/0734282911406666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyse, A. E., and R., Mapuranga. 2009. Differential item functioning analysis using Rasch item information functions. International Journal of Testing 9 (4):333–357. doi:10.1080/15305050903352040.
   Google Scholar
• Zumbo, B. D.. 1999. A handbook on the theory and methods of differential item functioning (dif): logistic regression modeling as a unitary framework for binary and likert-type (ordinal) item scores. Ottawa, ON: Directorate of Human Resources Research and Evaluation, Department of National Defense.
   Google Scholar
• Zumbo, B. D., and M. N., Gelin. 2005. A matter of test bias in educational policy research: bringing the context into picture by investigating sociological community moderated (or mediated) test and item bias. Journal of Educational Research and Policy Studies 5:1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Zwick, R.. 1990. When do item response function and Mantel-Haenszel definition of differential item functioning coincide? Journal of Educational Statistics 15 (3):185–197. doi:10.3102/10769986015003185.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2008. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar