A note on converting calibrated parameters of item response theory models

References

• Andersen, E. B. 1970. Asymptotic properties of conditional maximum likelihood estimators. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B) 32:283–301.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, E. B. 1972. The numerical solution of a set of conditional estimation equations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B) 34:42–54.
   Google Scholar
• Andrich, D. 1978. A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika 43:561–573. doi:10.1007/BF02293814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, R. D. 1972. Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories. Psychometrika 37:29–51. doi:10.1007/BF0229141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, R. D., and M. Aitkin. 1981. Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters. An application of the EM algorithm. Psychometrika 37:29–51. doi:10.1007/BF02293801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., and R. R. McCrae. 1992. The revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-facto inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Embretson, S. E., and S. P. Reise. 2000. Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, J., and M. Wiberg. 2017. Applying test equating methods. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-51824-4
   Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. K., and H. Swaminathan. 1985. Item response theory: Principles and applications. Boston: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Kolen, M. J., and R. L. Brennan. 2014. Test equating, scaling, and linking. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0317-7
   Google Scholar
• Lord, F. M. 1980. Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, F. M. 1986. Maximum likelihood and bayesian parameter estimation in item response theory. Journal of Educational Measurement 23 (2):157–62. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1986.tb00241.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, F. M., and M. R. Novick. 1968. Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Maechler, M., et al. 2017. SFSMISC: Utilities from 'Seminar fuer Statistik' ETH Zurich. R package version 1.1-1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sfsmisc
   Google Scholar
• Magis, D. 2015. A note on the equivalence between observed and expected information functions with polytomous IRT models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 40 (1):96–105. doi:10.3102/1076998614558122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magis, D., and J. R. Barrada. 2017. Computerized adaptive testing with R: Recent updates of the package catR. Journal of Statistical Software, Code Snippets 76 (1):1–19. doi:10.18637/jss.v076.c01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magis, D., D. Yan, and A. A. von Davier. 2017. Computerized adaptive and multistage testing (using R packages catR and mstR. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-69218-0
   Google Scholar
• Mellenbergh, G. J. 1995. Conceptual notes on models for discrete polytomous item responses. Applied Psychological Measurement 19 (1):91–100. doi:10.1177/014662169501900110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muraki, E. 1990. Fitting a polytomous item response model to likert-type data. Applied Psychological Measurement 14:59–71. doi:10.1177/014662169001400106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muraki, E. 1992. A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement 16:19–176. doi:10.1177/014662169201600206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterlind, S. J., and H. T. Everson. 2009. Differential item functioning (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ostini, R., and M. L. Nering. 2006. Polytomous item response theory models. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. doi:10.4135/9781412985413
   Google Scholar
• Penfield, R. D., and G. Camilli. 2007. Differential item functioning and item bias. In Handbook of statistics: Vol. 26. Psychometrics. ed. C. R. Rao and S. Sinharay, 125–167. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Core Team, R. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Reckase, M. D. 2009. Multidimensional item response theory. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-89976-3
   Google Scholar
• Samejima, F. 1969. Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph 34 (S1):1.
   Google Scholar
• Schuster, C., and K.-H. Yuan. 2011. Robust estimation of latent ability in item response models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 36 (6):720–35. doi:10.3102/1076998610396890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thissen, D., and L. Steinberg. 1986. A taxonomy of item response models. Psychometrika 51(4):567–77. doi:10.1007/BF02295596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Linden, W. J., and C. A. W. Glas. 2010. Elements of adaptive testing. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
   Google Scholar
• Warm, T. A. 1989. Weighted likelihood estimation of ability in item response models. Psychometrika 54 (3):427–50. doi:10.1007/BF02294627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar