The effect of cognitive and behavioral factors on student success in a bottleneck business statistics course via deeper analytics

References

• American Psychological Association (APA). 2018. American Psychological Association (APA) Website. https://www.apa.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Ames, R., and S. Lau. 1982. An attributional analysis of student help-seeking in academic settings. Journal of Educational Psychology 74 (3):414–23. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.74.3.414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, D. R. 2008. Model based inference in the life sciences. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Arroway, P., G. Morgan, M. O’Keefe, and R. Yanosky. 2016. Learning analytics in higher education. Research Report. Educause, Louisville, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhshinategh, B., O. R. Zaiane, S. Elatia, and D. Ipperciel. 2018. Educational data mining applications and tasks: A survey of the last 10 years. Education and Information Technologies 23 (1):537–53. doi:10.1007/s10639-017-9616-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bencheva, N. 2010. Learning styles and e-learning face-to-face to the traditional learning. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0927/8f8fa4f4243dbdb316cfa07b8f6d6fa466a7.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Beer, C., K. Clark, and D. Jones. 2010. Indicators of engagement. In Proceeding ASCILITE: Curriculum, technology & transformation for an unknown future, ed. C. Steel, M. J. Keppell, and P. Gerbic. Sydney: ASCILITE.
   Google Scholar
• Bergevin, P. M. 1993. The relationship between language and learning style. The Journal of Language for International Business 4:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Black, A. E., and E. L. Deci. 2000. The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education 84 (6):740–56. doi:10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<740::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borden, V. M. H., and H. Coates. 2017. Learning Analytics as a counterpart to surveys of student experience. New Directions for Higher Education 2017 (179):89–102. doi:10.1002/he.20246.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, T., A. McCoy, and S. Bates. 2008. The effect of Supplemental Instruction on timely graduation. College Student Journal 42:853–9.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman, L. 2001. Random Forests. Machine Learning 45 (1):5–32. doi:10.1023/A:1010933404324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brower, A. M., and A. Ketterhagen. 2004. Is there an inherent mismatch between how black and white students expect to succeed in college and what their colleges expect from them? Journal of Social Issues 60 (1):95–116. doi:10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00101.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burmeister, S. 1996. Supplemental Instruction: An interview with Deanna Martin. Journal of Developmental Education 20:22–6.
   Google Scholar
• Byrnes, J. P. 2003. Factors predictive of mathematics achievement in white, black, and Hispanic 12th graders. Journal of Educational Psychology 95 (2):316–26. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy, S. 2004. Learning styles: An overview of theories, models, and measures. Educational Psychology 24 (4):419–44.
   Google Scholar
• Chawla, N. V., K. W. Bowyer, L. O. Hall, and W. P. Kegelmeyer. 2002. SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 16:321–57. doi:10.1613/jair.953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, M. H., and C. Schroth. 2010. Examining relationships between academic motivation and personality among college students. Learning and Individual Differences 20 (1):19–24. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congos, D. H. 2003. Health checklist for Supplemental Instruction (SI) programs. The Learning Assistance Review 8 (2):29–45.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., and R. R. McCrae. 1992. Revised NEO personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, G., E. Doran, and N. A. S. Reyes. 2018. Predicting graduation rates at 4-year broad access institutions using a Bayesian modeling approach. Research in Higher Education 59 (2):133–55. doi:10.1007/s11162-017-9459-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., R. J. Vallerand, L. G. Pelletier, and R. M. Ryan. 1991. Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist 26 (3):325–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devadoss, S., and J. Foltz. 1996. Evaluation of factors influencing student attendance and performance. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78 (3):499–507. doi:10.2307/1243268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutt, A., M. A. Ismail, and T. Herawan. 2017. A systematic review on educational data mining. IEEE Access 5:15991–6005. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2654247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. 1986. Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist 41 (10):1040–8. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Educause. 2010. 7 Things you should know about analytics, EDUCAUSE 7 things you should know series. http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI7059.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, T. 2011. Learning analytics: Definitions, processes and potential. Athabasca University. http://learninganalytics.net/LearningAnalyticsDefinitionsProcessesPotential.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J., and M. A. Church. 1997. A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72 (1):218. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.72.1.218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, E. S., and C. S. Dweck. 1988. Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 (1):5–12. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.54.1.5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J., and H. A. McGregor. 2001. A 2 x 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80 (3):501. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.80.3.501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatima, D., S. Fatima, and A. V. Krishna Prasad. 2015. A survey on research work in educational data mining. IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering 17 (2):43–9.
   Google Scholar
• Fayowski, V., and P. MacMillan. 2008. An evaluation of the Supplemental Instruction programme in a first-year calculus course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 39 (7):843–55. doi:10.1080/00207390802054433.
   Google Scholar
• Filippidi, A., N. Tselios, and V. Komis. 2010. Impact of Moodle usage practices on students’ performance in the context of a blended learning environment. Patras, Greece: Social Applications for Lifelong Learning, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J., and S. Bartholomae. 1999. Student learning style and educational outcomes: Evidence from a family financial management course. Financial Services Review 8 (4):235–51. doi:10.1016/S1057-0810(00)00042-1.
   Google Scholar
• Gainen, J. 1995. Barriers to success in quantitative gatekeeper courses. In J. Gainen and E. W. Williamson (Eds.) Fostering student success in quantitative gateway courses, 5–14. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Glesne, C. 1998. Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Glesne, C. 1999. Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction, 2nd ed. Don Mills, ON: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. 1992. The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment 4 (1):26–42. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26.
   Google Scholar
• Hazrati-Viari, A., A. T. Rad, and S. S. Torabi. 2012. The effect of personality traits on academic performance: The mediating role of academic motivation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 32:367–71. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.055.
   Google Scholar
• Herndon, M. K., and J. L. Moore. 2002. African American factors for student success: Implications for families and counselors. The Family Journal 10 (3):322–7. doi:10.1177/10680702010003009.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, R., and W. G. White. 2001. Encouraging high-risk student participation in tutoring and Supplemental Instruction. Journal of Developmental Education 24 (3):2–10.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, L., K. Peter, and K. Rooney. 2002. Profile of undergraduates in U.S. postsecondary institutions: 1999–2000. NCES 2002–168. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, L. J., and M. D. Premo. 1995. Profile of undergraduates in U.S. postsecondary education institutions: 1992–93, with an essay on undergraduates at risk. NCES 96–237. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Hosmer, D. W., and S. Lemeshow. 2000. Applied logistic regression, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience Publication.
   Google Scholar
• House, J. D. 1995. Non-cognitive predictors of achievement in introductory college Mathematics. Journal of College Student Development 36 (2):171–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, H., and J. C. Lowry. 2003. Meeting the needs of consumers: Lessons for post-secondary environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 100:79–88. doi:10.1002/ace.121.
   Google Scholar
• Jiao, Q. G., D. A. DaRos-Voseles, K. M. T. Collins, and A. J. Onwuegbuzie. 2011. Academic procrastination and the performance of graduate-level cooperative groups in research methods courses. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 11 (1):119–38.
   Google Scholar
• Jo, I.-H., D. Kim, and M. Yoon. 2014. Analyzing the log patterns of adult learners in LMS using learning analytics. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK’14), 183–7. Indianapolis, IN: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Karabenick, S. A., and J. R. Knapp. 1991. Relationship of academic help seeking to the use of learning strategies and other instrumental achievement behavior in college students. Journal of Educational Psychology 83 (2):221–30. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.83.2.221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur, H., and E. G. Bathla. 2018. Student performance prediction using educational data mining techniques. International Journal on Future Revolution in Computer Science & Communication Engineering 4 (12):93–7.
   Google Scholar
• Kenney, P. 1989. Effects of Supplemental Instruction on student performance in a college level mathematics course. PhD diss., University of Texas-Austin. Dissertation Abstracts for Social Sciences, 50.
   Google Scholar
• Kenney, P. A., and J. M. Kallison. 1994. Research studies of the effectiveness of Supplemental Instruction in mathematics. In Supplemental Instruction: Increasing achievement and retention, ed. D. C. Martin and D. Arendale, 75–82. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. doi:10.1002/tl.37219946010.
   Google Scholar
• Kesahavamurthy, U., and H. S. Guruprasad. 2014. Learning analytics: A survey. International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology 18 (6):260–4. doi:10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V18P155.
   Google Scholar
• Koenker, R., and K. F. Hallock. 2001. Quantile regression. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15 (4):143–56. doi:10.1257/jep.15.4.143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. 1981. Learning styles and disciplinary differences. In The modern American college, ed. A. Clickering. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. 1986. Learning style inventory: Technical manual. Boston, MA: Hay Group, Hay Resources Direct.
   Google Scholar
• Komarraju, M., S. J. Karau, and R. R. Schmeck. 2009. Role of the Big Five personality traits in predicting college students’ academic motivation and achievement. Learning and Individual Differences 19 (1):47–52. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komarraju, M., and S. J. Karau. 2005. The relationship between the Big Five personality traits and academic motivation. Personality and Individual Differences 39 (3):557–67. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., and B. S. Bell. 2006. Disentangling achievement orientation and goal setting: Effects on self-regulatory processes. Journal of Applied Psychology 91 (4):900–16. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger, J., and D. Dunning. 1999. Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 (6):1121–34. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutner, M. H., C. J. Nachtsheim, and J. Neter. 2004. Applied linear regression models. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Lakshminarayan, N., S. Potdar, and S. G. Reddy. 2012. Relationship between procrastination and academic performance among a group of undergraduate dental students in India. Journal of Dental Education 77 (4):524–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, J., and P. Shu. 2005. Identification of leaning styles online by observing learners’ browsing behavior through a neural network. British Journal of Educational Technology 36 (1):43–55. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00437.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loo, R. 2002. A meta-analytic examination of Kolb’s learning style preferences among Business majors. Journal of Education for Business 77 (5):252–6. doi:10.1080/08832320209599673.
   Google Scholar
• Lyle, K., and W. Robinson. 2003. A statistical evaluation: Peer-led team learning in an organic chemistry class. Journal of Chemical Education 80 (2):132–4. doi:10.1021/ed080p132.
   Google Scholar
• MacFayden, L. P., and S. Dawson. 2010. Mining LMS data to develop an early warning system for educators: A proof of concept. Computers & Education 54 (2):588–99. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, J.-L., and R. P. Perry. 1992. Academic help-seeking in the university setting: The effects of motivational set, attributional style, and help source characteristics. Research in Higher Education 33 (2):227–45. doi:10.1007/BF00973580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malm, J., L. Bryngfors, and L. Morner. 2010. Supplemental Instruction (SI) at the Faculty of Engineering (LTH), Lund University, Sweden: An evaluation of the SI program at five LTH engineering programs, Autumn 2008. Australian Journal of Peer Learning 3 (1):38–50.
   Google Scholar
• Malm, J., L. Bryngfors, and L. Morner. 2011. Supplemental Instruction: Whom Does it Serve? International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 23 (3):282–91.
   Google Scholar
• Manjula, M. 2018. A systematic review on educational data mining. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology 4 (4):164–70.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, D. C., and D. Arendale. 1992. Supplemental Instruction: Improving first-year student success in high-risk courses. Columbia, SC: National Resource Center for the Freshman Year Experience.
   Google Scholar
• McEwan, B. C. 2001. Web-assisted and online learning. Business Communication Quarterly 64 (2):98–103.
   Google Scholar
• Meece, J. L., E. M. Anderman, and L. H. Anderman. 2006. Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology 57 (1):487–503. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra, S., and Z. Goldstein. 2015. Designing early detection and intervention techniques via predictive statistical models: A case study on improving student performance in a business statistics course. Communications in Statistics: Case Studies, Data Analysis and Applications 1 (1):9–21. doi:10.1080/23737484.2015.1063409.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, S., and Z. Goldstein. 2018. Impact of Supplemental Instruction on business courses: A statistical study. INFORMS Transactions on Education 18 (2):89–101. doi:10.1287/ited.2017.0178.
   Google Scholar
• Mwalumbwe, I., and J. S. Mtebe. 2017. Using learning analytics to predict students’ performance in Moodle learning management system: A case of Mbeya University of science and technology. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 79 (1):1–13. doi:10.1002/j.1681-4835.2017.tb00577.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naveh, G., D. Tubin, and N. Pliskin. 2012. Student satisfaction with learning management systems: A lens of critical success factors. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 21 (3):337–50. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2012.720413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, R. S. 2002. How self-regulated learners cope with academic difficulty: The role of adaptive help seeking. Theory into Practice 41 (2):132–8. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4102_10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, M. C., and S. V. Paunonen. 2007. Big Five personality predictors of post-secondary academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences 43 (5):971–90. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, P., D. Thompson, A. Russell, and C. Simons. 2003. Supplemental Instruction: Short and long-term impact. Journal of Developmental Education 26 (3):2–8.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, S. C., S. S. Youngcourt, and J. M. Beaubien. 2007. A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net. Journal of Applied Psychology 92 (1):128–50. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, A., D. Mani, S. Rasathurai, and M. Greene. 2007. The effectiveness of Supplemental Instruction and technology in increasing student performance in mathematics (Supplemental Instruction update). Kansas City: The International Center for SI, University of Missouri–Kansas City.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., and E. V. De Groot. 1990. Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 82 (1):33–40. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.82.1.33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers, D. M. W. 2011. Evaluation: From precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness & correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies 2 (1):37–63.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, C., and J. Freiberg. 1994. Freedom to learn, 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Romer, D. 1993. Do students go to class? Should they? Journal of Economic Perspectives 7 (3):167–74. doi:10.1257/jep.7.3.167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozental, A., and P. Carlbring. 2014. Understanding and treating procrastination: A review of a common self-regulatory failure. Psychology 5 (13):1488–502. doi:10.4236/psych.2014.513160.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., and E. L. Deci. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 55 (1):68–78. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, A. M., M. H. Gheen, and C. Midgley. 1998. Why do some students avoid asking for help? An examination of the interplay among students’ academic efficacy, teachers’ social-emotional role, and the classroom goal structure. Journal of Educational Psychology 90 (3):528–35. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saucier, G., and L. R. Goldberg. 1996. Evidence of the Big Five in analyses of familiar English personality adjectives. European Journal of Personality 10 (1):61–77. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199603)10:1<61::AID-PER246>3.0.CO;2-D.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarr, S. 1992. Developmental theories of the 1990s: Development and individual differences. Child Development 63 (1):1–19. doi:10.2307/1130897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., and P. A. Ertmer. 2000. Self-regulation and academic learning: Self-efficacy enhancing interventions. In Handbook of self-regulation, ed. M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner, 631–49. San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sedlacek, W. E. 2004. Why we should use noncognitive variables with graduate and professional students. The Advisor: The Journal of the National Association of Advisors for the Health Professions 24 (2):32–9.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, E., and N. Hewitt. 1997. Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Shaya, S. B., H. R. Petty, and L. I. Petty. 1993. Education: A case study of Supplemental Instruction in biology focuses on at-risk students. Bioscience 43 (10):709–11. doi:10.2307/1312343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheather, S. 2009. A modern approach to regression with R. New York: Springer NY.
   Google Scholar
• Shmueli, G., P. C. Bruce, and N. R. Patel. 2016. Data mining for business analytics: Concepts, techniques, and applications with XLMiner. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, N., and M. Kelly. 2015. How college business students learn with emphasis on differences between majors. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC) 12 (3):223–30. doi:10.19030/tlc.v12i3.9314.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, R. E., L. Corno, and D. Jackson. 1996. Individual differences in a affective and conative functions. In Handbook of educational psychology, ed. D. C. Berliner, and R. C. Calfee. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan
   Google Scholar
• Society for Learning Analytics Research (SOLAR). 2019. Society for Learning Analytics Research (SOLAR) website. https://solaresearch.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Tobias, S. 1990. They’re not dumb, they’re different: Stalking the second tier. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Tuckman, B. W. 1991. The development and concurrent validity of the procrastination scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement 51 (2):473–80. doi:10.1177/0013164491512022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagerman, S. A., and D. C. Funder. 2007. Acquaintance reports of personality and academic achievement: A case for conscientiousness. Journal of Research in Personality 41 (1):221–9. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2006.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, L., T. Searle, and R. Price. 2018. The use of learning analytics to support improvements in teaching practice. Innovative Research Universities, Melbourne, Australia. https://www.iru.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/MRUN-Learning-Analytics-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Whitmer, J. 2012. Logging on to improve achievement: Evaluating the relationship between use of the learning management system, student characteristics, and academic achievement in a hybrid large enrollment undergraduate course. University of California. http://johnwhitmerdotnet.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/jwhitmer_dissertation_complete_1-21-2013.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Widmar, G. E. 1994. Supplemental Instruction: From small beginnings to a national program. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 60:3–10. doi:10.1002/tl.37219946003.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, F. K., and C. Koehler. 2007. Supplemental Instruction: Critical thinking and academic assistance. Metropolitan Universities. An International Forum 6 (4):87–99.
   Google Scholar
• Wratcher, M. A., E. E. Morrison, V. L. Riley, and L. S. Scheirton. 1997. Curriculum and program planning: A study guide for the core seminar. Fort Lauderdale, FL: Nova Southeastern University Programs for Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, T., and I. Jo. 2014. Educational technology approach toward learning analytics relationship between student online behavior and learning performance in higher education. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 269–70. Indianapolis, IN: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. 1998. Academic studying and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist 33 (2–3):73–86. doi:10.1080/00461520.1998.9653292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., and M. M. Pons. 1988. Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 80 (3):284–90. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.80.3.284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar