169
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The efficiency of run rules schemes for the multivariate coefficient of variation in short runs process

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 2942-2962 | Received 09 Nov 2018, Accepted 10 Dec 2019, Published online: 20 Dec 2019

References

  • Amdouni, A., P. Castagliola, H. Taleb, and G. Celano. 2015. Monitoring the coefficient of variation using a variable sample size control chart in short production runs. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 81 (1-4):1–14. doi:10.1007/s00170-015-7084-4.
  • Amdouni, A., P. Castagliola, H. Taleb, and G. Celano. 2016. One-sided run rules control charts for monitoring the coefficient of variation in short production runs. European Journal Of Industrial Engineering 10 (5):639–63. doi:10.1504/EJIE.2016.078804.
  • Calzada, M. E., and S. M. Scariano. 2013. A synthetic control chart for the coefficient of variation. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 83 (5):853–67. doi:10.1080/00949655.2011.639772.
  • Castagliola, P., A. Achouri, H. Taleb, G. Celano, and S. Psarakis. 2013. Monitoring the coefficient of variation using control charts with runs rules. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management 10:75–94. doi:10.1080/16843703.2013.11673309.
  • Castagliola, P., A. Amdouni, H. Taleb, and G. Celano. 2015. One-sided Shewhart-type charts for monitoring the coefficient of variation in short production runs. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management 12:53–67. doi:10.1080/16843703.2015.11673366.
  • Castagliola, P., G. Celano, S. Fichera, and G. Nenes. 2013. The variable sample size t control chart for monitoring short production runs. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 66:1353–66. doi:10.1007/s00170-012-4413-8.
  • Castagliola, P., G. Celano, and S. Psarakis. 2011. Monitoring the coefficient of variation using EWMA charts. Journal of Quality Technology 43 (3):249–65. doi:10.1080/00224065.2011.11917861.
  • Celano, G., and P. Castagliola. 2018. An EWMA sign control chart with varying control limits for finite horizon processes. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 34 (8):1717–31. doi:10.1002/qre.2365.
  • Celano, G., P. Castagliola, S. Chakraborti, and G. Nenes. 2016. The performance of the Shewhart sign control chart for finite horizon processes. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 84:1497–512. doi:10.1007/s00170-015-7745-3.
  • Celano, G., P. Castagliola, E. Trovato, and S. Fichera. 2011. Shewhart and EWMA t control charts for short production runs. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 27 (3):313–26. doi:10.1002/qre.1121.
  • Centore, P. 2016. The coefficient of variation as a measure of spectrophotometric repeatability. Color Research & Application 41 (6):571–9. doi:10.1002/col.22002.
  • Haghighi, F., and P. Castagliola. 2019. Control chart for monitoring the Weibull shape parameter under two competing risks. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 48 (7):2125–37. doi:10.1080/03610918.2018.1433845.
  • He, X., and S. O. Oyadiji. 2001. Application of coefficient of variation in reliability-based mechanical design and manufacture. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 119 (1-3):374–8. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00938-4.
  • Hong, E., C. Kang, J. Baek, and H. Kang. 2008. Development of CV control chart using EWMA technique. Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering 31:114–20.
  • Hu, X. L., and P. Castagliola. 2019. A re-evaluation of the run rules xbar chart when the process parameters are unknown. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management 16:696–725. doi:10.1080/16843703.2018.1513826.
  • Kang, C. W., M. S. Lee, Y. J. Seong, and D. M. Hawkins. 2007. A control chart for the coefficient of variation. Journal of Quality Technology 39 (2):151–8. doi:10.1080/00224065.2007.11917682.
  • Khatun, M., M. B. C. Khoo, M. H. Lee, and P. Castagliola. 2019. One-sided control charts for monitoring the multivariate coefficient of variation in short production runs. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control 41 (6):1712–28. doi:10.1177/0142331218789481.
  • Khaw, K. W., X. Chew, W. C. Yeong, and S. L. Lim. 2019. Optimal design of the synthetic control chart for monitoring the multivariate coefficient of variation. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 186:33–40. doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2019.02.001.
  • Knight, J., and S. Satchell. 2005. A re-examination of Sharpe’s ratio for log-normal prices. Applied Mathematical Finance 12 (1):87–100. doi:10.1080/1350486042000271647.
  • Ladany, S. P. 1973. Optimal use of control charts for controlling current production. Management Science 19 (7):763–72. doi:10.1287/mnsc.19.7.763.
  • Lee, M. H., and M. B. C. Khoo. 2018. Double sampling |S| control chart with variable sample size and variable sampling interval. Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation 47:615–28. doi:10.1080/03610918.2017.1288246.
  • Lim, A. J. X., M. B. C. Khoo, W. L. Teoh, and A. Haq. 2017. Run sum chart for monitoring multivariate coefficient of variation. Computers & Industrial Engineering 109:84–95. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2017.04.023.
  • Malela-Majika, J., and E. M. Rapoo. 2017. Distribution-free synthetic and runs-rules control charts combined with a Mann-Whitney chart. International Journal of Quality Engineering and Technology 6 (4):219–48. doi:10.1504/IJQET.2017.094305.
  • Nenes, G., and G. Tagaras. 2007. The economically designed two-sided Bayesian X¯ control chart. European Journal of Operational Research 183:263–77. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.074.
  • Nenes, G., P. Castagliola, G. Celano, and S. Panagiotidou. 2014. The variable sampling interval control chart for finite-horizon processes. IIE Transactions 46 (10):1050–65. doi:10.1080/0740817X.2013.876128.
  • Nenes, G., and G. Tagaras. 2010. Evaluation of CUSUM charts for finite-horizon processes. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 39 (3):578–97. doi:10.1080/03610910903528319.
  • Raji, I. A., N. Abbas, and M. Riaz. 2018. On designing a robust double exponentially weighted moving average control chart for process monitoring. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control 40 (15):4253–65. doi:10.1177/0142331217744614.
  • Rakitzis, A. C. 2016. Monitoring exponential data using two-sided control charts with runs rules. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 86 (1):149–59. doi:10.1080/00949655.2014.998219.
  • Reed, G. F., F. Lynn, and B. D. Meade. 2002. Use of coefficient of variation in assessing variability of quantitative assays. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology 9:1235–9. doi:10.1128/CDLI.9.6.1235-1239.2002.
  • Sharpe, W. F. 1994. The Sharpe ratio. The Journal of Portfolio Management 21 (1):49–58. doi:10.3905/jpm.1994.409501.
  • Teoh, W. L., M. B. C. Khoo, P. Castagliola, W. C. Yeong, and S. Y. Teh. 2017. Run-sum control charts for monitoring the coefficient of variation. European Journal of Operational Research 257 (1):144–58. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.067.
  • Tran, K. P. 2016. The efficiency of the 4-out-of-5 runs rules scheme for monitoring the ratio of population means of a bivariate normal distribution. International Journal of Relability, Quality and Safety Engineering 23:1–26. doi:10.1142/S0218539316500200.
  • Tran, K. P. 2017. Run rules median control charts for monitoring process mean in manufacturing. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 33 (8):2437–50. doi:10.1002/qre.2201.
  • Tran, K. P. 2018. Designing of run rules t control charts for monitoring changes in the process mean. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 174:85–93. doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2018.01.009.
  • Tran, K. P., P. Castagliola, and G. Celano. 2016. Monitoring the ratio of two normal variables using run rules type control charts. International Journal of Production Research 54 (6):1670–88. doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1047982.
  • Voinov, V. G., and M. S. Nikulin. 1996. Unbiased estimator and their applications, multivariate case (Vol. 2.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Yeong, W. C., M. B. C. Khoo, W. L. Teoh, and P. Castagliola. 2016. A control chart for the multivariate coefficient of variation. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 32 (3):1213–25. doi:10.1002/qre.1828.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.