The revisited knockoffs method for variable selection in L₁-penalized regressions

References

• Agresti, A. 2010. Analysis of ordinal categorical data. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN 978-0-470-08289-8. doi:10.1002/9780470594001.
   Google Scholar
• Agresti, A. 2013. Categorical data analysis. Wiley series in probability and statistics. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. ISBN 9780470463635,0470463635.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. A., and P. R. Philips. 1981. Regression, discrimination and measurement models for ordered categorical variables. Applied Statistics 30 (1):22–31. doi:10.2307/2346654.
   Google Scholar
• Auger, I. E., and C. E. Lawrence. 1989. Algorithms for the optimal identification of segment neighborhoods. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 51 (1):39–54. ISSN 0092-8240. doi:10.1016/S0092-8240(89)80047-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, R. F., and E. J. Candes. 2015. Controlling the false discovery rate via knockoffs. The Annals of Statistics 43 (5):2055–85. ISSN 0090-5364. doi:10.1214/15-AOS1337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, R. F., and E. J. Candes. 2019. A knockoff filter for high-dimensional selective inference. The Annals of Statistics 47 (5):2504–37.
   Google Scholar
• Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman. 2001. The elements of statistical learning. New York: Springer Series in Statistics. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 0-387-95284-5. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5.URL . Data mining, inference, and prediction.
   Google Scholar
• Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, and M. Wainwright. 2015. Statistical learning with sparsity: The lasso and generalizations. Boca Raton; London; New York: CRC press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, I., and A. Agresti. 2005. The analysis of ordered categorical data: An overview and a survey of recent developments. Test 14 (1):1–73. ISSN 1133-0686. With discussion and a rejoinder by the authors. doi:10.1007/BF02595397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H., K. Roeder, and L. Wasserman. 2010. Stability approach to regularization selection (stars) for high dimensional graphical models. In Advances in neural information processing systems 23, ed. J. D. Lafferty, C. K. I. Williams, J. Shawe-Taylor, R. S. Zemel, and A. Culotta, 1432–40. Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• McCullagh, P. 1980. Regression models for ordinal data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 42 (2):109–42. ISSN 0035-9246. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1980.tb01109.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, M. Y., and T. Hastie. 2007. L1-regularization path algorithm for generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 69 (4):659–77. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00607.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picard, F., S. Robin, E. Lebarbier, and J.-J. Daudin. 2007. A segmentation/clustering model for the analysis of array CGH data. Biometrics 63 (3):758–66. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00729.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picard, F., S. Robin, M. Lavielle, C. Vaisse, G. Celeux, and J.-J. Daudin. 2004. A statistical approach for CGH microarray data analysis. PhD thesis., INRIA.
   Google Scholar
• Sai Suggala, A., E. Yang, and P. Ravikumar. 2017. Ordinal graphical models: A tale of two approaches. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 70 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, ed. D. Precup and Y. Whye Teh, 3260–9. Australia: International Convention Centre, Sydney, 06–11 Aug 2017. PMLR.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, G. 1974. Alternative analyses for the singly-ordered contingency table. Journal of the American Statistical Association 69 (348):971–6. doi:10.1080/01621459.1974.10480239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey, J. D. 2002. A direct approach to false discovery rates. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 64 (3):479–98. doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibshirani, R. 1996. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 58 (1):267–88. ISSN 0035-9246. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, L., and K. Roeder. 2009. High dimensional variable selection. Annals of Statistics 37 (5A):2178–201. doi:10.1214/08-aos646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, O. D., and J. E. Grizzle. 1972. Analysis of contingency tables having ordered response categories. Journal of the American Statistical Association 67 (337):55–63. doi:10.1080/01621459.1972.10481205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, T. T., Y. F. Chen, T. Hastie, E. Sobel, and K. Lange. 2009. Genome-wide association analysis by lasso penalized logistic regression. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 25 (6):714–21. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, P., and B. Yu. 2006. On model selection consistency of Lasso. Journal of Machine Learning Research 7:2541–63. ISSN 1532-4435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, J., and T. Hastie. 2004. Classification of gene microarrays by penalized logistic regression. Biostatistics (Oxford, England) 5 (3):427–43. doi:10.1093/biostatistics/5.3.427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar