Modeling and analysis of functional method comparison data

References

• Barnhart, H. X., M. J. Haber, and L. I. Lin. 2007. An overview on assessing agreement with continuous measurements. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 17 (4):529–69. doi:10.1080/10543400701376480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., and M. Maechler. Matrix: Sparse and Dense Matrix Classes and Methods, 2017. URL https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Matrix, R package version 1.2–12.
   Google Scholar
• Berrendero, J. R., A. Justel, and M. Svarc. 2011. Principal components for multivariate functional data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 55 (9):2619–34. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2011.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland, J. M., and D. G. Altman. 1986. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet 327 (8476):307–10. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinchilli, V. M., J. K. Martel, S. Kumanyika, and T. Lloyd. 1996. A weighted concordance correlation coefficient for repeated measurement designs. Biometrics 52 (1):341–53. doi:10.2307/2533172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiou, J. M., Y. T. Chen, and Y. F. Yang. 2014. Multivariate principal component analysis: A normalization approach. Statistica Sinica 24:1571–96. doi:10.5705/ss.2013.305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhary, P. K., and H. N. Nagaraja. 2017. Measuring Agreement: Models, Methods, and Applications. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, G. 2007. Regression models for method comparison data. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 17 (4):739–56. doi:10.1080/10543400701329513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, J., S. Greven, and C. Crainiceanu. 2013. Corrected confidence bands for functional data using principal components. Biometrics 69 (1):41–51. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01808.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, J., F. Scheipl, L. Huang, J. Wrobel, J. Gellar, J. Harezlak, M. W. McLean, B. Swihart, L. Xiao, C. Crainiceanu, et al. 2016. refund: Regression with Functional Data, URL https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=refund, R package version 0.1-16.
   Google Scholar
• Happ, C., and S. Greven. 2018. Multivariate functional principal component analysis for data observed on different (dimensional) domains. Journal of the American Statistical Association 113 (522):649–59. doi:10.1080/01621459.2016.1273115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Happ, C. 2018. MFPCA: Multivariate Functional Principal Component Analysis for Data Observed on Different Dimensional Domains, 2018. URL https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MFPCA, R package version 1.2.
   Google Scholar
• Higham, N. 2002. Computing the nearest correlation matrix | A problem from finance. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis 22 (3):329–43. doi:10.1093/imanum/22.3.329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiriote, S., and V. M. Chinchilli. 2011. Matrix-based concordance correlation coefficient for repeated measures. Biometrics 67 (3):1007–16. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01549.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hothorn, T., F. Bretz, and P. Westfall. 2008. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift 50 (3):346–63. doi:10.1002/bimj.200810425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacques, J., and C. Preda. 2014. Model-based clustering for multivariate functional data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 71:92–106. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2012.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, T. S., V. M. Chinchilli, and J. L. Carrasco. 2007. A repeated measures concordance correlation coefficient. Statistics in Medicine 26 (16):3095–113. doi:10.1002/sim.2778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, R., and M. Chow. 2005. Evaluation of reproducibility for paired functional data. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 93 (1):81–101. doi:10.1016/j.jmva.2004.01.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, L. I. 1989. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45 (1):255–68. Corrections: 2000, 56:324–25. doi:10.2307/2532051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, L. I. 2000. Total deviation index for measuring individual agreement with applications in laboratory performance and bioequivalence. Statistics in Medicine 19 (2):255–70. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000130)19:2<255::AID-SIM293>3.0.CO;2-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2018. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, URL http://www.R-project.org.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsay, J. O., and B. W. Silverman. 2005. Functional Data Analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rathnayake, L. N., and P. K. Choudhary. 2017. Semiparametric modeling and analysis of longitudinal method comparison data. Statistics in Medicine 36 (13):2003–15. doi:10.1002/sim.7261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, S. N. 2017. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Yao, F., H. G. Müller, and J. L. Wang. 2005. Functional data analysis for sparse longitudinal data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 100 (470):577–90. doi:10.1198/016214504000001745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, L., J. Z. Huang, and R. J. Carroll. 2008. Joint modelling of paired sparse functional data using principal components. Biometrika 95 (3):601–19. doi:10.1093/biomet/asn035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar