106
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Optimal planning of progressively Type-I censored step-stress accelerated life test under interval inspection

&
Pages 7565-7586 | Received 29 Feb 2020, Accepted 16 Oct 2020, Published online: 04 Nov 2020

References

  • Bagdonavicius, V., and M. Nikulin. 2002. Accelerated life models: Modeling and statistical analysis. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman Hall.
  • Bai, D. S., M. S. Kim, and S. H. Lee. 1989. Optimum simple step-stress accelerated life tests with censoring. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 38 (5):528–32. doi:10.1109/24.46476.
  • Balakrishnan, N. 2007. Progressive censoring methodology: An appraisal. Test 16 (2):211–59.
  • Balakrishnan, N., and E. Cramer. 2014. The art of progressive censoring: Applications to reliability and quality. Basel: Birkhäuser.
  • Balakrishnan, N., and D. Han. 2008. Exact inference for a simple step-stress model with competing risks for failure from exponential distribution under Type-II censoring. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 138 (12):4172–86. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2008.03.036.
  • Balakrishnan, N., and D. Han. 2009. Optimal step-stress testing for progressively Type-I censored data from exponential distribution. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 139 (5):1782–98. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2008.05.030.
  • Balakrishnan, N., D. Han, and G. Iliopoulos. 2011. Exact inference for progressively Type-I censored exponential failure data. Metrika 73 (3):335–58. doi:10.1007/s00184-009-0281-0.
  • Cohen, A. C. 1963. Progressively censored samples in life testing. Technometrics 5 (3):327–39. doi:10.1080/00401706.1963.10490102.
  • Cramer, E., and G. Iliopoulos. 2010. Adaptive progressive Type-II censoring. Test 19 (2):342–58. doi:10.1007/s11749-009-0167-5.
  • Fard, N., and C. Li. 2009. Optimal simple step-stress accelerated life test design for reliability prediction. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 139 (5):1799–808. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2008.05.046.
  • Gouno, E., A. Sen, and N. Balakrishnan. 2004. Optimal step-stress test under progressive Type-I censoring. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 53 (3):388–93. doi:10.1109/TR.2004.833320.
  • Guan, Q., and Y. Tang. 2012. Optimal step-stress test under Type-I censoring for multivariate exponential distribution. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 142 (7):1908–23. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2012.02.029.
  • Han, D. 2015. Time and cost constrained optimal designs of constant-stress and step-stress accelerated life tests. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 140:1–14. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.026.
  • Han, D. 2017. Optimal accelerated life tests under a cost constraint with non-uniform stress durations. Quality Engineering 29 (3):409–30. doi:10.1080/08982112.2017.1313982.
  • Han, D., and T. Bai. 2019a. On the maximum likelihood estimation for progressively censored lifetimes from constant-stress and step-stress accelerated life tests. Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis 12:392–404.
  • Han, D., and T. Bai. 2019b. Parameter estimation using EM algorithm for lifetimes from constant-stress and step-stress accelerated life tests under interval monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Reliability (in print). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8936687.
  • Han, D., and N. Balakrishnan. 2010. Inference for a simple step-stress model with competing risks for failure from the exponential distribution under time constraint. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 54 (9):2066–81. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2010.03.015.
  • Han, D., N. Balakrishnan, A. Sen, and E. Gouno. 2006. Corrections on optimal step-stress test under progressive Type-I censoring. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 55 (4):613–14. doi:10.1109/TR.2006.884601.
  • Han, D., and D. Kundu. 2015. Inference for a step-stress model with competing risks from the generalized exponential distribution under Type-I censoring. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 64 (1):31–43. doi:10.1109/TR.2014.2336392.
  • Han, D., and H. K. T. Ng. 2013. Comparison between constant-stress and step-stress accelerated life tests under time constraint. Naval Research Logistics (NRL) 60 (7):541–56. doi:10.1002/nav.21551.
  • Kateri, M., U. Kamps, and N. Balakrishnan. 2009. A meta-analysis approach for step-stress experiments. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 139 (9):2907–19. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2009.01.013.
  • Lawless, J. F. 1982. Statistical models and methods for lifetime data. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
  • Lee, J., and R. Pan. 2012. A GLM approach to step-stress accelerated life testing with interval censoring. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 142 (4):810–19. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2011.09.015.
  • Meeker, W. Q., and L. A. Escobar. 1998. Statistical methods for reliability data. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
  • Miller, R., and W. Nelson. 1983. Optimum simple step-stress plans for accelerated life testing. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 32:59–65.
  • Montgomery, D. C. 2001. Design and analysis of experiments. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
  • Nelson, W. 1990. Accelerated testing: Statistical models, test plans, and data analyses. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
  • Pascual, F. 2010. Accelerated life test planning with independent lognormal competing risks. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 140 (4):1089–100. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2009.11.003.
  • Pradhan, B., and D. Kundu. 2009. On progressively censored generalized exponential distribution. Test 18 (3):497–515. doi:10.1007/s11749-008-0110-1.
  • Wang, B. X. 2010. Interval estimation for exponential progressive Type-II censored step-stress accelerated life-testing. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 140 (9):2706–18. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2010.03.033.
  • Wang, B. X., and K. Yu. 2009. Optimum plan for step-stress model with progressive Type-II censoring. Test 18 (1):115–35. doi:10.1007/s11749-007-0060-z.
  • Wu, C. F., and M. Hamad. 2000. Experiments: Planning, analysis, and parameter design optimization. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
  • Xu, A., and A. Tang. 2015. Reference optimality criterion for planning accelerated life testing. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 167:14–26. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2015.06.002.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.