Comparison of estimators and predictors based on modified weibull records: Bayesian and non-Bayesian approaches

References

• Aboeleneen, Z. A. 2010. Inference for Weibull distribution under generalized order statistics. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 81 (1):26–36. doi:10.1016/j.matcom.2010.06.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi, J., M. J. Jozani, E. Marchand, and A. Parsian. 2009a. Bayes estimation based on k− record data from a general class of distributions under balanced type loss functions. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 139:1180–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi, J., M. J. Jozani, E. Marchand, and A. Parsian. 2009b. Prediction of k− records from a general class of distributions under balanced type loss functions. Metrika 70:19–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahsanullah, M. 2004. Record values-theory and applications. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Amini, M., J. Ahmadi, and N. Balakrishnan. 2012. Fisher information in bivariate record values from a sample of fixed size. Statistics 46 (1):23–69. doi:10.1080/02331888.2010.494729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, B. C., N. Balakrishnan, and H. N. Nagaraja. 1998. Records. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Asgharzadeh, A.,. A. Fallah, M. Z. Raqab, and R. Valiollahi. 2018. Statistical inference based on Lindley record data. Statistical Papers 59 (2):759–79. doi:10.1007/s00362-016-0788-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awad, A. M., and M. Z. Raqab. 2000. Prediction intervals for the future record values from exponential distribution: Comparative study. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 65 (1–4):325–40. doi:10.1080/00949650008812005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan, N., and P. S. Chan. 1998. On the normal record values and associated inference. Statistics & Probability Letters 39 (1):73–80. doi:10.1016/S0167-7152(98)00048-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basak, P., and N. Balakrishnan. 2003. Maximum likelihood prediction of future record statistic. In Mathematical and statistical methods in reliability, vol. 7 in series on quality, reliability and engineering statistics, ed. B. H. Lindquist and K. A. Doksum, 159–75. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Basu, A. P., and N. Ebrahimi. 1991. Bayesian approach to life testing and reliability estimation using asymmetric loss function. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 29 (1–2):21–31. doi:10.1016/0378-3758(92)90118-C.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J. O. 1985. Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Calabria, R., and G. Pulcini. 1996. Point estimation under asymmetric loss functions for left-truncated exponential samples. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 25 (3):585–600. doi:10.1080/03610929608831715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christoffersen, P. F., and F. X. Diebold. 1996. Further results on forecasting model selection under asymetric loss. Journal of Applied Econometrics 11 (5):561–71. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199609)11:5<561::AID-JAE406>3.0.CO;2-S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, R. 2011. On the distribution of Burr with applications. Sankhya¯ B 73:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Gulati, S., and W. J. Padgett. 2003. Parametric and nonparametric inference from record-breaking data. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kaminsky, K. S., and L. Rhodin. 1985. Maximum likelihood prediction. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 37 (3):507–17. doi:10.1007/BF02481119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, E. L., and P. Meier. 1958. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association 53 (282):457–81. doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotb, M. S. 2014. Bayesian inference and prediction for modified Weibull distribution under generalized order statistics. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems 17 (5–6):547–78. doi:10.1080/09720510.2014.903707.
   Google Scholar
• Kotb, M. S., and M. Z. Raqab. 2017. Inference and prediction for modified Weibull distribution based on doubly censored samples. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 132:195–207. doi:10.1016/j.matcom.2016.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotb, M. S., and M. Z. Raqab. 2019. Statistical inference for modified Weibull distribution based on progressively type-II censored data. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 162:233–48. doi:10.1016/j.matcom.2019.01.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C. D., M. Xie, and D. N. P. Murthy. 2003. A modified Weibull distribution. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 52 (1):33–7. doi:10.1109/TR.2002.805788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawless, J. F. 1982. Statistical model & methods for lifetime data. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Martz, H. F., and R. A. Waller. 1982. Bayesian reliability analysis. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Nadar, M., A. Papadopoulos, and F. Kızılaslan. 2013. Statistical analysis for Kumaraswamy’s distribution based on record data. Statistical Papers 54 (2):355–69. doi:10.1007/s00362-012-0432-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, W. B. 1982. Applied life data analysis. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Raqab, M. Z. 1997. Modified maximum likelihood predictors of future order statistics from normal samples. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 25 (1):91–106. doi:10.1016/S0167-9473(96)00082-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raqab, M. Z. 2002. Inferences for generalized exponential distribution based on record statistics. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 104 (2):339–50. doi:10.1016/S0378-3758(01)00246-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raqab, M. Z., J. Ahmadi, and M. Doostparast. 2007. Statistical inference based on record data from Pareto model. Statistics 41 (2):105–18. doi:10.1080/02331880601106579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raqab, M. Z., and M. Ahsanullah. 2001. Estimation of the location and scale parameters of generalized exponential distribution based on order statistics. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 69 (2):109–24. doi:10.1080/00949650108812085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarhan, A. M., and M. Zaindin. 2009. Modified Weibull distribution. Applied Sciences 11:123–36.
   Google Scholar
• Soland, R. M. 1969. Bayesian analysis of the Weibull process with unknown scale and shape parameters. IEEE Transactions on Reliability R-18 (4):181–4. doi:10.1109/TR.1969.5216348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soliman, A. A., A. H. Abd Ellah, and K. S. Sultan. 2006. Comparison of estimates using record statistics from Weibull model: Bayesian and non-Bayesian approaches. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 51 (3):2065–77. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2005.12.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varian, H. R. 1975. A Bayesian approach to real estate assessment. In Studies in Bayesian econometrics and statistics in Honor of L. J. Savage, ed. S. E. Feinberg and A. Zellner, 195–208. Amsterdam: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Zaindin, M., and A. M. Sarhan. 2009. Parameters estimation of the modified Weibull distribution. Applied Mathematical Sciences 3 (11):541–50.
   Google Scholar
• Zellner, A. 1986. Bayesian estimation and prediction using asymmetric loss function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81 (394):446–51. doi:10.1080/01621459.1986.10478289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar