Bayesian estimation of multidimensional polytomous item response theory models with Q-matrices using Stan

References

• Andrich, D. 1978. A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika 43 (4):561–73. doi:10.1007/BF02293814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo, C. L., H. Bolfarine, and D. F. Andrade. 2012. Parameter recovery for a skew-normal IRT model under a Bayesian approach: Hierarchical framework, prior and kernel sensitivity and sample size. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 82 (11):1679–99. doi:10.1080/00949655.2011.591798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béguin, A., and C. Glas. 2001. MCMC estimation and some model-fit analysis of multidimensional IRT models. Psychometrika 66 (4):541–61. doi:10.1007/BF02296195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, R. D. 1972. Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories. Psychometrika 37 (1):29–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, L. 2010. Metropolis-hastings Robbins-Monro algorithm for confirmatory item factor analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 35 (3):307–35. doi:10.3102/1076998609353115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, S. 2010. Bugs code for item response theory. Journal of Statistical Software 36 (Code Snippet 1):1–34. doi:10.18637/jss.v036.c01.
   Google Scholar
• da Silva, M. A., J. L. Bazán, and A. C. Huggins-Manley. 2019. Sensitivity analysis and choosing between alternative Polytomous IRT models using Bayesian model comparison criteria. Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation 48 (2):601–20. doi:10.1080/03610918.2017.1390126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silva, M. A., R. Liu, A. C. Huggins-Manley, and J. L. Bazán. 2019. Incorporating the Q-matrix into multidimensional item response theory models. Educational and Psychological Measurement 79 (4):665–87. doi:10.1177/0013164418814898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J.-P. 2010. Bayesian item response modeling: Theory and applications. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Fragoso, T., and M. Cúri. 2013. Improving psychometric assessment of the Beck depression inventory using multidimensional item response theory. Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift 55 (4):527–40. doi:10.1002/bimj.201200197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelfand, A., and A. Smith. 1990. Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association 85 (410):398–409. doi:10.1080/01621459.1990.10476213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., J. B. Carlin, H. S. Stern, and D. B. Rubin. 2014. Bayesian data analysis. 3rd ed. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., and D. Rubin. 1992. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science 7 (4):457–72. doi:10.1214/ss/1177011136.
   Google Scholar
• Geman, S., and D. Geman. 1984. Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 6 (6):721–41. doi:10.1109/tpami.1984.4767596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girolami, M., and B. Calderhead. 2011. Riemann manifold Langevin and Hamiltonian Monte Carlo methods. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 73 (2):123–214. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00765.x.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, R. L., D. C. Furr, B. Carpenter, and A. Gelman. 2017. Fitting Bayesian item response models in Stata and Stan. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata 17 (2):343–57. doi:10.1177/1536867X1701700206.
   Google Scholar
• Hastings, W. 1970. Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika 57 (1):97–109. doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, M., and A. Gelman. 2014. The No–U–Turn Sampler: Adaptively setting path lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. Journal of Machine Learning Research 15 (1):1593–623.
   Google Scholar
• Lunn, D. J., A. Thomas, N. Best, and D. Spiegelhalter. 2000. Winbugs – a Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility. Statistics and Computing 10 (4):325–37. doi:10.1023/A:1008929526011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martelli, I., M. Matteucci, and S. Mignani. 2016. Bayesian estimation of a multidimensional additive graded response model for correlated traits. Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation 45 (5):1636–54. doi:10.1080/03610918.2014.932804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metropolis, N., A. Rosenbluth, M. Rosenbluth, A. Teller, and E. Teller. 1953. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. The Journal of Chemical Physics 21 (6):1087–92. doi:10.1063/1.1699114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muraki, E. 1992. A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement 16 (2):159–76. doi:10.1177/014662169201600206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muraki, E., and J. E. Carlson. 1995. Full-information factor analysis for polytomous item responses. Applied Psychological Measurement 19 (1):73–90. doi:10.1177/014662169501900109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer, M. 2003. Jags: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. In DSC 2003 Working Papers, pp. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Reckase, M. 2009. Multidimensional item response theory. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Robitzsch, A., T. Kiefer, A. C. George, A. Uenlue, and M. A. Robitzsch. 2018. Package ‘cdm’.
   Google Scholar
• Sahu, S. 2002. Bayesian estimation and model choice in item response models. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 72 (3):217–32. doi:10.1080/00949650212387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samejima, F. 1969. Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Psychometrika 34 (S1):1–97. doi:10.1007/BF03372160.
   Google Scholar
• Sinharay, S., M. Johnson, and H. Stern. 2006. Posterior predictive assessment of item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement 30 (4):298–321. doi:10.1177/0146621605285517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiegelhalter, D. J., N. G. Best, B. P. Carlin, and A. van der Linde. 2002. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 64 (4):583–639. doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stan Development Team. 2017. Rstan: The R interface to Stan. http://mc-stan.org.
   Google Scholar
• Tatsuoka, K. 1983. Rule space: An approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory. Journal of Educational Measurement 20 (4):345–54. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1983.tb00212.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vehtari, A., A. Gelman, and J. Gabry. 2017. Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC. Statistics and Computing 27 (5):1413–32. doi:10.1007/s11222-016-9696-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe, S. 2010. Asymptotic equivalence of Bayes cross validation and widely applicable information criterion in singular learning theory. Journal of Machine Learning Research 11:3571–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, L., and R. D. Schwarz. 2006. A multidimensional partial credit model with associated item and test statistics: An application to mixed-format tests. Applied Psychological Measurement 30 (6):469–92. doi:10.1177/0146621605284537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar