Optimal personalized treatment selection with multivariate outcome measures in a multiple treatment case

References

• Butler, E. L., E. B. Laber, S. M. Davis, and M. R. Kosorok. 2017. Incorporating patient preferences into estimation of optimal individualized treatment rules. Biometrics 74 (1):18–26. doi:10.1111/biom.12743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y., W. Wu, W. Feng, J. Wang, Y. Chen, Y. Shen, Q. Li, X. Zhang, and C. Li. 2012. The effects of multi-domain versus single-domain cognitive training in non-demented older people: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Medicine 10:30. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-10-30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertefaie, A., T. Wu, K. G. Lynch, and I. Nahum-Shani. 2016. Identifying a set that contains the best dynamic treatment regimes. Biostatistics 17:135148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, T. R., and J. H. Powers. 2012. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine 31 (25):2973–84. doi:10.1002/sim.5403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genz, A., F. Bretz, T. Miwa, X. Mi, F. Leisch, F. Scheipl, B. Bornkamp, M. Maechler, and T. Hothorn. 2017. mvtnorm: Multivariate normal & t distributions, R package version 1.0-3. September 29, 2017. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mvtnorm/.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, S. M., D. A. Katzenstein, M. D. Hughes, H. Gundacker, R. T. Schooley, et al. 1996. A trial comparing nucleoside monotherapy with combination therapy in HIV-infected adults with CD4 cell counts from 200 to 500 per cubic millimeter. New England Journal of Medicine 335:1081–90. doi:10.1056/NEJM199610103351501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hristache, M., A. Juditsky, J. Polzehl, and V. Spokoiny. 2001. Structure Adaptive Approach for Dimension Reduction. The Annals of Statistics 29 (6):1537–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ichimura, H., P. Hall, and W. Hardle. 1993. Optimal smoothing in single index models. The Annals of Statistics 21 (1):157–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, P., Greiner, W. Al-Dakkak, and S. Wagner. 2015. Which metrics are appropriate to describe the value of new cancer therapies? BioMed Research International 2015: 865101. doi:10.1155/2015/865101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juraska, M., P. B. Gilbert, X. Lu, M. Zhang, D. Davidianet, et al. 2017. spe 2trial: Semi parametric efficient estimation for a two-sample treatment effect; R package version 1.0.4 2012. September 29, 2017. http://cran.r-project.org/package=spe2trial.
   Google Scholar
• Kosorok, M. R., and E. E. Moodie. 2015. Adaptive treatment strategies in practice: Planning trials and analyzing data for personalized medicine. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. doi:10.1137/1.9781611974188.
   Google Scholar
• Laber, E. B., D. J. Lizotte, and B. Ferguson. 2014. Set-valued dynamic treatment regimes for competing outcomes. Biometrics 70:53–61. doi:10.1111/biom.12132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S. C., U. Lindenberger, and S. Sikström. 2001. Aging cognition: From neuromodulation to representation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (11):479–86. Nov 1 PMID: 11684480. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01769-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lizotte, D. J., M. Bowling, and S. Murphy. 2012. Linear fitted-Q iteration with multiple reward functions. Journal of Machine Learning Research 13:3253–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lizotte, D. J., and E. B. Laber. 2016. Multi-objective Markov decision processes for data-driven decision support. Journal of Machine Learning Research 17:1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, S. A. 2003. Optimal dynamic treatment regimes. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 65:331–55. doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pihur, V., S. Datta, and S. Datta. 2007. Weighted rank aggregation of cluster validation measures: A Monte Carlo cross-entropy approach. Bioinformatics 23:1607–15. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pihur, V., S. Datta, and S. Datta. 2009. RankAggreg, an R package for weighted rank aggregation. BMC Bioinformatics 10:62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siriwardhana, C., S. Datta, and K. B. Kulasekera. 2020. Selection of the optimal personalized treatment from multiple treatments with multivariate outcome measures. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 30 (3):462–80. doi:10.1080/10543406.2019.1684304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siriwardhana, C., M. Zhao, S. Datta, and K. Kulasekera. 2019. A probability based method for selecting the optimal personalized treatment from multiple treatments. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 28 (3):749–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statisticat, LLC. 2017. LaplacesDemon: Complete Environment for Bayesian Inference. Bayesian-Inference.com; R package version 16.0.1. September 29, 2017. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/LaplacesDemon/.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, H., and D. F. Nixon. 2010. T cell immunity in acute HIV-1 infection. Journal of Infectious Diseases 202:302–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unnikrishnan, A. G., A. Bhattacharyya, M. P. Baruah, B. Sinha, M. Dharmalingam, and P. V. Rao. 2013. Importance of achieving the composite endpoints in diabetes. Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism 17 (5):835–43. doi:10.4103/2230-8210.117225.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van’t Veer, L. J., and R. Bernards. 2008. Enabling personalized cancer medicine through analysis of gene-expression patterns. Nature 452:564–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vazquez, A. 2013. Optimization of personalized therapies for anticancer treatment. BMC Systems Biology 7. doi:10.1186/1752-0509-7-31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wand, M. P., and M. C. Jones. 1995. Kernel Smoothing. Chapman & Hall London.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, Y., and D. David Ruppert. 2002. Penalized Spline Estimation for Partially Linear Single-Index Models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 97 (460):1042–54. doi:10.1198/016214502388618861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., Z. Donglin, A. J. Rush, and M. K. Kosorok. 2012. Estimating individualized treatment rules using outcome weighted learning. Journal of the American Statistical Association 107 (499):1106–18. doi:10.1080/01621459.2012.695674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar