A two-stage design for multivariate estimation of proportions

References

• Abdelfatah, S., Mazloum, R. (2014). Improved randomized response models using three decks of cards. Model Assisted Statistics and Applications, 9(1):63–72.
   Google Scholar
• Abdelfatah, S., Mazloum, R. (2015). Efficient estimation in a two-stage randomized response model. Mathematical Population Studies, 22(4):234–251.
   Google Scholar
• Arnab, R., Singh, S., North, D. (2012). Use of two decks of cards in randomized response techniques for complex survey designs. Commun. Stat.-Theory Methods 41(16–17):3198–3210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabesi, L., Franceschi, S., Marcheselli, M. (2012). A randomized response procedure for multiple-sensitive questions. Stat. Pap. 53(3):703–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barksdale, W.B. (1971). New randomized response techniques for control of non-sampling errors in surveys. Diss. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Bourke, P.D. (1982). Randomized response multivariate designs for categorical data. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 11(25):2889–2901.
   Google Scholar
• Bouza, C.N. (2009). Ranked set sampling and randomized response procedures for estimating the mean of a sensitive quantitative character. Metrika 70(3):267–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christofides, T.C. (2005). Randomized response technique for two sensitive characteristics at the same time. Metrika 62(1):53–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diana, G., Perri, P.F. (2010). New scrambled response models for estimating the mean of a sensitive quantitative character. J. Appl. Stat. 37(11):1875–1890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, S. (1973). Randomized interviews for sensitive questions. Thesis. Gothenburg University, Dept. of Statistics, University Institute of Statistics. ASIN: B0007BPDVI.
   Google Scholar
• Giordano, S., Perri, P.F. (2012). Efficiency comparison of unrelated question models based on same privacy protection degree. Stat. Pap. 53(4):987–999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, B.G., Abul-Ela, A.L.A., Simmons, W.R., Horvitz, D.G. (1969). The unrelated question randomized response model: theoretical framework. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 64(326):520–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, B.G., Kuebler,Jr, R.R., Abernathy, J.R., Horvitz, D.G. (1971). Application of the randomized response technique in obtaining quantitative data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 66(334):243–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, S., Mehta, S., Shabbir, J., Dass, B.K. (2013). Generalized scrambling in quantitative optional randomized response models. Commun. Stat.-Theory Methods 42(22):4034–4042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, K.C. (2007). Constructing optimal randomized response designs with consideration for the level of privacy protection. Stat. Neerland. 61(3):284–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain, Z., Shabbir, J. (2011). An estimation of sensitive proportion utilizing higher order moments of auxiliary variable. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2(2):121–125.
   Google Scholar
• Krumpal, I. (2012). Estimating the prevalence of xenophobia and anti-Semitism in Germany: A comparison of randomized response and direct questioning. Social Science Research, 41(6):1387–1403.
   Google Scholar
• Land, M., Singh, S., Sedory, S.A. (2011). Estimation of a rare sensitive attribute using Poisson distribution. Statistics 46(3):351–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C., Sedory, S., Singh, S (2013). Estimation at least seven measures of qualitative variables from a single sample using randomized response technique. Stat. Probab. Lett. 83(1):399–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, G.S., Hong, K.H., Kim, J.M., Son, C.K. (2014). Estimation of the proportion of a sensitive attribute based on a two-stage randomized response model with stratified unequal probability sampling. Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics, 28(3):381–408.
   Google Scholar
• Mangat, N.S., Singh, R. (1990). An alternative randomized response procedure. Biometrika 77(2):439–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odumade, O., Singh, S. (2009). Efficient use of two decks of cards in randomized response sampling. Commun. Stat.-Theory Methods 38(4):439–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odumade, O., Singh, S. (2010). An alternative to the Bar-Lev, Bobovitch, and Boukai randomized response model. Sociol. Methods Res. 39(2):206–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rueda, M., Munoz, J.F., Arcos, A., Álvarez, E., Martínez, S. (2011). Estimators and confidence intervals for the proportion using binary auxiliary information with applications to pharmaceutical studies. J. Biopharmaceut. Stat. 21(3):526–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamhane, A.C. (1981). Randomized response techniques for multiple sensitive attributes. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 76(376):916–923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usman, A., Oshungade, I.O. (2012). A two-way randomized response technique in stratification for tracking HIV seroprevalence. Math. Theory Model. 2(7):86–97.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, S.L. (1965). Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 60(309):63–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhimin, H., Zaizai, Y. (2012). Measure of privacy in randomized response model. Qual. Quant. 46(4):1167–1180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar