References
- Antonak, R.F., Livneh, H. (1995). Randomized reponse technique: A review and proposed estension to disability attitude research. Genet. Soc. Gen. Psychol. Monogr. 121:97–145.
- Edward, A.L. (1957). The Social Desirability Variable in Personality Assessment and Research. New York: Dryden.
- Eichhorn, B.H., Hayre, L.S. (1983). Scrambled randomized response methods for obtaining sensitive quantitative dada. J. Stat. Plann. Inference. 7:307–316.
- Finkelhor, D., Lewis, I.A. (1988). An epidemiological approach to the study of child molestation. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 14:19–40.
- Fisher, M., Kupferman, L.B., Lesser, M. (1992). Substance use in a school – based clinic population: Use of the randomized response technique to estimate prevalence. J. Adolesc. Health. 13:281–285.
- Fisher, R.J. (1993). Socially desirable responding and the validity of indirect questioning. J. Consum. Res. 20:303–315.
- Gupta, S., Shabbir, J. (2004). Sensitivity estimation for personal interview survey questions. Stat. anno LXIV 4:643–653.
- Gupta, S., Thornton, B. (2002). Circumventing social desirability response bias in personal interview survey. Am. J. Math. Manage. Sci. 22:369–383
- Heijden, P.G.M., Gils, G.V., Bouts, J., Hox, J. (1998). A comparison of randomized response, CASAQ, and direct questioning; eliciting sensitive information in the context of fraud. Kwant. Meth. 19:15–34.
- Hussain, Z., Al-Sobhi, M.M., Al-Zahrani, B. (2014) Additive and subtractive scrambling in optional randomized response model. Plos One 9(1):e 83557.
- Jones, E.E., Sigall, H. (1971). The bogus pipe line: a new paradigm for measuring affect and attitude. Psychol. Bull. 76:349–364.
- Lensvelt-Mulders, G.J.L.M., Hox, J.J., Heijden, V.D., Mass, P.G.M., Mass, C.H.M. (2005). Meta – analysis of randomized response research: Thirty – five years of validation. Sociol. Methods Res. 33:319–348.
- Mangat, N.S., Singh, R. (1990). An alternative randomized response procedure. Biometrika 77:439–442.
- Mehta, S., Dass, B.K., Shabbir, J., Gupta, S. (2012). A three stage optional randomized response model. J. Stat. Theory Pract. 6(3):417–426.
- Mensch, B.S., Kandel, D.B. (1988). Underreporting of substance use in a national longitudinal youth chort. Publ. Opin. Q. 52:100–119.
- Mick, D.G. (1996). Are studies of dark side variable confounded by socially desirable responding. J. Consum. Res. 23:106–119.
- Tracy, D.S., Osahan, S.S. (1995). A partial randomized response strategy. Test 4(2):315–321.
- Voicer, B.J., Voicer, L. (1982). Randomized response technique for estimating alcohol use and non compliance in hypertensive. J. Stud. Alcohol. 43:739–750.
- Warner, S.L. (1965). Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 60:63–69.
- Weissman, A.N., Steer, R.A., Lipton, D.S. (1986). Estimating illicit drug use through telephone interviews and the randomized response technique. Drug Alcohol Depend. 18:225–233.
- Williams, B.L., Suen, H. (1994). A methodological comparison of survey technique in obtaining self-reports of condom – related behaviors. Psychol. Rep. 7:1531–1537.