58
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

On the Flatland paradox and limiting arguments

Pages 12281-12289 | Received 20 Jun 2016, Accepted 08 Feb 2017, Published online: 06 Sep 2017

References

  • Abbott, E. 1884. Flatland: A romance of many dimensions. London: Seeley & Co.
  • Berger, J. O., and J. M. Bernardo. 1992. On the development of reference priors (with discussion). In Bayesian Statistics 4, eds. J. M. Bernardo, J. O. Berger, D. V. Lindley, and A. F. M. Smith. London: Oxford University Press, pp. 35–60.
  • Bernardo, J. M. 1979. Reference posterior distributions for Bayesian inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B 41:113–47.
  • Bioche, C., and P. Druilhet. 2016. Approximation of improper priors. Bernoulli 22 (3):1709–28.
  • de Finetti, B. 1972. Probability, induction and statistics. The art of guessing. London-New York-Sydney: John Wiley & Sons. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics.
  • Heath, D., and W. Sudderth. 1989. Coherent inference from improper priors and from finitely additive priors. The Annals of Statistics 17 (2):907–19.
  • Hill, B. M. 1980. On some statistical paradoxes and nonconglomerability. In Bayesian statistics (Valencia, 1979), 39–66. Valencia: Univ. Press.
  • Irony, T. Z., and N. D. Singpurwalla. 1997. Non-informative priors do not exist: a dialogue with José M. Bernardo. The Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 65 (1):159–89. With comments and a rejoinder by Bernardo.
  • Jaynes, E. T. 2003. Probability theory : The logic of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Edited and with a foreword by G. Larry Bretthorst.
  • Kadane, J. B., M. J. Schervish, and T. Seidenfeld. 1986. Statistical implications of finitely additive probability. In Bayesian inference and decision techniques, volume 6 of Stud. Bayesian Econometrics Statist., 59–76. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  • Kass, R. E., and L. Wasserman. 1996. The selection of prior distributions by formal rules. Journal of the American Statistical Association 91 (435):1343–70.
  • Lehmann, E. L. 1959. Testing statistical hypotheses. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; London: Chapman & Hall, Ltd.
  • Schervish, M. J., T. Seidenfeld, and J. B. Kadane. 1984. The extent of nonconglomerability of finitely additive probabilities. Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und verwandte Gebiete 66 (2):205–26.
  • Stone, M. 1976. Strong inconsistency from uniform priors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 71 (353):114–25.
  • Stone, M. 1982. Review and analysis of some inconsistencies related to improper priors and finite additivity. In Logic, methodology and philosophy of science, VI (Hannover, 1979), volume 104 of Stud. Logic Foundations Math., 413–26. Amsterdam-New York: North-Holland.
  • Stone, M., and A. Dawid. 1972. Un-Bayesian implications of improper Bayes inference in routine statistical problems. Biometrika 2 (59):369–75.
  • Taraldsen, G., and B. H. Lindqvist. 2010. Improper priors are not improper. American Statistical 64 (2):154–8.
  • Taraldsen, G., and B. H. Lindqvist. 2016. Conditional probability and improper priors. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods In press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.