Determination of a new mixed variable lot-size multiple dependent state sampling plan based on the process capability index

References

• Ahmad, L., M. Aslam, and C.-H. Jun. 2014. Designing of X-bar control charts based on process capability index using repetitive sampling. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control 36 (3):367–74. 10.1177/0142331213502070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. E. 2005. Assessing the process capability index for non-normal processes. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 129 (1–2):195–206. 10.1016/j.jspi.2004.06.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., M. Azam, S. Balamurali, and C.-H. Jun. 2012. A new mixed acceptance sampling plan based on sudden death testing under the Weibull distribution. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers 29 (6):427–33. 10.1080/10170669.2012.717542
   Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., M. Azam, and C.-H. Jun. 2013c. A mixed repetitive sampling plan based on process capability index. Applied Mathematical Modelling 37 (24):10027–35. 10.1016/j.apm.2013.05.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., M. Azam, and C.-H. Jun. 2013d. Multiple dependent state sampling plan based on process capability index. Journal of Testing and Evaluation 41:340–46. 10.1520/JTE20120012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., M. Azam, N. Khan, and C.-H. Jun. 2015a. A control chart for an exponential distribution using multiple dependent state sampling. Quality and Quantity 49 (2):455–62. 10.1007/s11135-014-0002-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., S. Balamurali, M. Azam, and C. H. Jun. 2015b. A new mixed variable lot-size sampling plan based on process capability index. Journal of Testing and Evaluation 43 (6):1456–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., C. W. Wu, M. Azam, and C. H. Jun. 2013a. Variable sampling inspection for resubmitted lots based on process capability index Cpk for normally distributed items. Applied Mathematical Modelling 37 (3):667–75. 10.1016/j.apm.2012.02.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., C.-W. Wu, M. Azam, and C.-H. Jun. 2014. Mixed acceptance sampling plans for product inspection using process capability index. Quality Engineering 26:450–59. 10.1080/08982112.2014.903970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., C. W. Wu, C. H. Jun, M. Azam, and N. Itay. 2013b. Developing a variables repetitive group sampling plan based on process capability index Cpk with unknown mean and variance. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 83 (8):1507–17. 10.1080/00949655.2012.663374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., C. H. Yen, and C. H. Jun. 2011. Variable repetitive group sampling plans with process loss consideration. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 81 (11):1417–32. 10.1080/00949655.2010.487826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S. 2003. Bootstrap confidence limits for short-run capability indices. Quality Engineering 15 (4):643–48.
   Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., M. Azam, and M. Aslam. 2016. Attribute-variable inspection lots policy using resampling based on EWMA. Communications in Statistics- Simulation and Computation 45 (8):3014–35. 10.1080/03610918.2014.938827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., P. Jeyadurga, and M. Usha. 2016. Designing of Bayesian multiple deferred state sampling plan based on gamma-Poisson distribution. American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences 35 (1):77–90. 10.1080/01966324.2015.1086708
   Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., and C.-H. Jun. 2007. Multiple dependent state sampling plans for lot acceptance based on measurement data. European Journal of Operational Research 180 (3):1221–30. 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.05.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., and C.-H. Jun. 2009. Designing of a variables two-plan system by minimizing the average sample number. Journal of Applied Statistics 36 (10):1159–72. 10.1080/02664760802562514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., and M. Kalyanasundaram. 2002. Bootstrap lower confidence limits for the process capability indices Cp, Cpk and Cpm. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 19 (8/9):1088–97.
   Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., H. Park, C. H. Jun, K. J. Kim, and J. Lee. 2005. Designing of variables repetitive group sampling plan involving minimum average sample number. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation 34 (3):799–809. 10.1081/SAC-200068424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., and M. Usha. 2012. Optimal designing of a variables quick switching sampling system by minimizing the average sample number. Journal of Applied Statistical Science 19 (3):295–310.
   Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., and M. Usha. 2014. Optimal designing of variables quick switching system based on the process capability index Cpk. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering 31 (2):85–94. 10.1080/21681015.2014.893929
   Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., and M. Usha. 2015. Optimal designing of variables sampling plan for resubmitted lots. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation 44 (5):1210–24. 10.1080/03610918.2013.810256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, L. K., S. W. Cheng, and F. A. Spiring. 1988. A new measure of process capability Cpk. Journal of Quality Technology 20 (3):162–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, Y. M., and D. B. Owen. 1989. On the distributions of the estimated process capability indexes. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods 18 (12):4549–60. 10.1080/03610928908830174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collani, E. V. 1991. A note on acceptance sampling for variables. Metrika 38 (1):19–36. 10.1007/BF02613596
   Google Scholar
• Govindaraju, K., and S. Balamurali. 1998. Chain sampling plan for variables inspection. Journal of Applied Statistics 25 (1):103–09. 10.1080/02664769823331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindaraju, K., and K. Subramani. 1993. Selection of multiple deferred (dependent) state sampling plans for given acceptable quality level and limiting quality level. Journal of Applied Statistics 20 (3):423–28. 10.1080/02664769300000041
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, Y. C., W. L. Pearn, and C. W. Pei. 2008. Capability adjustment for gamma processes with mean shift consideration in implementing six sigma program. European Journal of Operational Research 191 (2):517–29. 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.07.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyanasundaram, M., and S. Balamurali. 2000. Determination of variable lot-size attribute sampling plan indexed by the acceptable quality level and average outgoing quality level for continuous production. Journal of Applied Statistics 27:171–75. 10.1080/02664760021709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, V. E. 1986. Process capability indices. Journal of Quality Technology 18 (1):41–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuralmani, V., and K. Govindaraju. 1992. Selection of multiple deferred (dependent) state sampling plans. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods 21 (5):1339–66. 10.1080/03610929208830851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurniati, N., R.-H. Yeh, and C.-W. Wu. 2015. A sampling scheme for resubmitted lots based on one-sided capability indices. Quality Technology and Quantitative Management 12 (4):501–15. 10.1080/16843703.2015.11673433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, G. J., and G. J. Resnikoff. 1955. Sampling plans for inspection by variables*. Journal of the American Statistical Association 50 (270):457–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C. 2009. Introduction to Statistical Quality Control. 6th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Nocedal, J., and S. J. Wright. 1999. Numerical Optimization. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pearn, W. L., S. Kotz, and N. L. Johnson. 1992. Distributional and inferential properties of process capability indices. Journal of Quality Technology 24 (4):216–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearn, W. L., and C.-W. Wu. 2007. An effective decision making method for product acceptance. Omega 35 (1):12–21. 10.1016/j.omega.2005.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, D. R., and D. W. Beattie. 1961. The variable lot-size acceptance sampling plan for continuous production. Applied Statistics 10:146–56. 10.2307/2985206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling, E. G. 1982. Acceptance sampling in quality control. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling, E. G., and H. F. Dodge. 1969. Procedures and tables for evaluating dependent mixed acceptance sampling plans. Technometrics 11 (2):341–72. 10.1080/00401706.1969.10490690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidel, W. 1997a. Is sampling by variables worse than sampling by attributes? A decision theoretic analysis and a new mixed strategy for inspecting individual lots. Sankhyā: the Indian Journal of Statistics, Series B:96–107.
   Google Scholar
• Seidel, W. 1997b. A possible way out of the pitfall of acceptance sampling by variables: treating variances as unknown. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 25 (2):207–16. 10.1016/S0167-9473(96)00089-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soundararajan, V., and R. Vijayaraghavan. 1989. On designing multiple deferred state sampling (MDS-1 (0, 2)) plans involving minimum risks. Journal of Applied Statistics 16 (1):87–94. 10.1080/02664768900000010
   Google Scholar
• Soundararajan, V., and R. Vijayaraghavan. 1990. Construction and selection of multiple dependent (deferred) state sampling plan. Journal of Applied Statistics 17 (3):397–409. 10.1080/02664769000000012
   Google Scholar
• Vaerst, R. 1982. A procedure to construct multiple deferred state sampling plan. Methods of Operations Research 37:477–85.
   Google Scholar
• Wortham, A. W., and R. C. Baker. 1976. Multiple deferred state sampling inspection. International Journal of Production Research 14 (6):719–31. 10.1080/00207547608956391
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, N. F., G. A. Stenback, and D. M. Wardrop. 1990. Interval estimation of process capability index Cpk. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods 19 (12):4455–70. 10.1080/03610929008830451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar