A review of backtesting for value at risk

References

• Basel Committee of Banking Supervision. 1996. Supervisory framework for the use of “Backtesting” in conjunction with the internal models approach to market risk capital requirements. www.bis.org
   Google Scholar
• Basel Committee of Banking Supervision. 2006. International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards - a revised framework, comprehensive version. www.bis.org
   Google Scholar
• Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. 2011. Basel III: A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems. www.bis.org/publ/bcbs189.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bera, A. K., S. Ivliev, and F. Lillo. 2015. Financial econometrics and empirical market microstructure. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, J. 2000. Testing density forecasts, with applications to risk management. Irvine: Graduate School of Management, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, J. 2001. Testing density forecasts with applications to risk management. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 19:465–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, J., P. Christoffersen, and D. Pelletier. 2011. Evaluating value-at-risk models with desk-level data. Management Science 57:2213–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bontemps, C. 2014. Simple moment-based tests for Value-at-Risk models and discrete distributions. Working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. 2005. A review of backtesting and backtesting procedures. Finance and Economics Discussion Series. Washington, DC: Federal Reserve Board.
   Google Scholar
• Christoffersen, P. 1998. Evaluating interval forecasts. International Economic Review 39:841–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christoffersen, P., and D. Pelletier. 2002. Backtesting portfolio risk measures. Working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Christoffersen, P., and D. Pelletier. 2004. Backtesting Value-at-Risk: A duration-based approach. Journal of Financial Econometrics 2:84–108.
   Google Scholar
• Colletaz, G., C. Hurlin, and C. Perignon. 2013. The risk map: A new tool for validating risk models. Journal of Banking and Finance 37:3843–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crnkovic, C., and J. Drachman. 1996. Quality control in VaR: Understanding and applying Value-at-Risk. Risk 9:139–43.
   Google Scholar
• de la Pena, V. H., R. Rivera, and J. Ruiz-Mata. 2006. Quality control of risk measures: Backtesting VAR models. Journal of Risk 9:39–54.
   Google Scholar
• da Silva, A. C. R., C. H. da Silveira Barbedo, G. S. Araujo, and M. B. E. das Neves. 2006. Internal models validation in Brazil: Analysis of VaR backtesting methodologies. Revista Brasileira de Financas 4.
   Google Scholar
• Daniela, Z., K. Edina, and C. M. Ioan. 2014. Backtesting value at risk models in the presence of structural break on the Romanian and Hungarian stock markets. 802–10.
   Google Scholar
• Dowd, K. 2002. A bootstrap back-test. Risk 93–94.
   Google Scholar
• Dumitrescu, E.-I., C. Hurlin, and V. Pham. 2012. Backtesting Value-at-Risk: From dynamic quantile to dynamic binary tests. Finance 33:79–112.
   Google Scholar
• Efron, B., and R. J. Tibshirani. 1994. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. F., and S. Manganelli. 2004. CAViaR: Conditional autoregressive value at risk by regression quantiles. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 22:367–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escanciano, J. C., and J. Olmo. 2010. Backtesting parametric Value-at-Risk with estimation risk. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 28:36–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escanciano, J. C., and J. Olmo. 2011. Robust backtesting tests for Value-at-risk models. Journal of Financial Econometrics 9:132–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitschen, K. 2013. Building reliable trading systems: tradable strategies that perform as they backtest and meet your risk-reward goals. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Franke, J., W. Härdle, and G. Stahl. 2012. Measuring risk in complex stochastic systems. New York: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gorgulho, A. M. S. B. S., R. F. M. F. Neves, and N. C. G. Horta. 2013. Intelligent financial portfolio composition based on evolutionary computation strategies. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, M. 2001. New methods in backtesting. Working Paper, Financial Engineering Research Center. www.ime.usp.br/∼rvicente/risco/haas.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Haas, M. 2006. Improved duration-based backtesting of value-at-risk. Journal of Risk 8:17–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hurlin, C., G. Colletaz, S. Tokpavi, and B. Candelon. 2010. Backtesting Value-at-Risk: A GMM duration based test. Journal of Financial Econometrics 2010:1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hurlin, C., and S. Tokpavi. 2006. Backtesting value-at-risk accuracy: a simple new test. Journal of Risk 9:19–37.
   Google Scholar
• Iorgulescu, F. 2012. Backtesting Value-at-Risk: Case study on the Romanian capital market. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 62:796–800.
   Google Scholar
• Jorion, P. 2001. Value at risk, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Krämer, W., and D. Wied. 2015. A simple and focused backtest of value at risk1. Working paper, Technische Universität Dortmund, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Kresta, A. 2013. Backtesting the filtered historical simulation for the VaR estimation of the Prague stock market index. Journal of Economics, Management and Business 23:15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Kupiec, P. 1995. Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models. Journal of Derivatives 2:73–84.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y. X., J. G. Lian, and H. K. Hang. 2016. Forecast and backtesting of VAR models in crude oil market. Research and Reviews: Journal of Statistics and Mathematical Sciences 2:131–140.
   Google Scholar
• Lichters, R., R. Stamm, and D. Gallagher. 2015. Modern derivatives pricing and credit exposure analysis: theory and practice of CSA and XVA pricing, exposure simulation and backtesting. New York: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, J. A. 1998. Testing your risk tests. Financial Survey 18–20.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, J. A. 1999. Methods for evaluating value-at-risk estimates. Economic Review: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco 2:3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Matras, K. 2011. Finding #1 stocks: Screening, backtesting and time-proven strategies. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, A. J., R. Frey, and P. Embrechts. 2015. Quantitative risk management: concepts, techniques and tools. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nadarajah, S., and S. Chan. 2016. Estimation methods for value at risk. In Chapter 12 of extreme events in finance: A handbook of extreme value theory and its applications, ed. F. Longin, 303–73. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Pajhede, T. 2015. Backtesting Value-at-Risk: A generalized Markov framework. Working paper, Lancaster University, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Patra, B., and P. Padhi. 2015. Backtesting of Value at Risk methodology: Analysis of banking shares in India. Journal of Applied Economic Research 9:254–77.
   Google Scholar
• Pelletier, D., and W. Wei. 2015. The geometric-VaR backtesting method. Journal of Financial Econometrics 2015:1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Perignon, C., and D. Smith. 2008. A new approach to comparing VaR estimation methods. Journal of Derivatives 16:54–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2016. A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Schulmerich, M. 2010. Real options valuation: The importance of interest rate modelling in theory and practice. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tichy, T. 2012. Some findings about risk estimation and backtesting at the world FX rate market. In: Proceedings of 30th International Conference Mathematical Methods in Economics, 897–902.
   Google Scholar
• Virdi, N. K. 2011. A review of backtesting methods for evaluating Value-at-Risk. International Review of Business Research Papers 7:14–24.
   Google Scholar