Reliability and sensitivity comparisons and average run lengths of CUSUM scale chart

References

• Abbas, N., M. Riaza, and R. J. M. M. Does. 2011. Enhancing the performance of EWMA charts. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 27 (6):821–33. doi:10.1002/qre.1175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbasi, S. A., M. Riaz, and A. Miller. 2012. Enhancing the performance of CUSUM scale chart. Computer & Industrial Engineering 63:400–409. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2012.03.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acosta, M. C., J. Pigniatiello, and B. Rao. 1999. A comparison of control charting procedures for monitoring process dispersion. IIE Transactions 31 (6):569–79. doi:10.1080/07408179908969859.
   Google Scholar
• Aldosari, M. S., M. Aslam, and C.-H. Jun. 2017. A new attribute control chart using multiple dependent state repetitive sampling. IEEE Access 5:6192–97. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2687523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M. 2016. A mixed EWMA–CUSUM control chart for weibull-distributed quality characteristics. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 32 (8):2987–94. doi:10.1002/qre.1982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., and C.-H. Jun. 2015. Attribute control charts for the weibull distribution under truncated life tests. Quality Engineering 27 (3):283–88. doi:10.1080/08982112.2015.1017649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., O. H. Arif, and C.-H. Jun. 2017. An attribute control chart for a weibull distribution under accelerated hybrid censoring. PloS one 12 (3):e0173406. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0173406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., M. Azam, N. Khan, and C.-H. Jun. 2015. A mixed control chart to monitor the process. International Journal of Production Research 53 (15):4684–93. doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1031354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box, G., and J. Ramirez. 1991. Sequential methods in statistical process monitoring (Report # 65), University of wisconsin-madison, center for quality and productivity.
   Google Scholar
• Castagliola, P., G. Celano, and S. Fichera. 2009. A new CUSUM-S2 control chart for monitoring the process variance. Quality in Maintenance Engineering 15 (4):344–57. doi:10.1108/13552510910997724.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, T. C., and F. F. Gan. 1995. A cumulative sum control chart for monitoring process variance. Journal of Quality Technology 27 (2):109–19. doi:10.1080/00224065.1995.11979574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eshelman, C. T. 2009. Sensitivity comparisons and averages run lengths of the MEWMS and MEWMV Control charts using individual observations with singular mean shifts and variance changes. University of Northern Colorado, Dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Ewan, W. D. 1963. When and how to use cu-sum charts. Technometrics 5 (1):1–22. doi:10.1080/00401706.1963.10490055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farouk, A. U. 2012. Average run length efficiency of CUSUM control charts with normal distribution. Archives Des Sciences 65 (12):443–54.
   Google Scholar
• Gan, F. F. 1993. An optimal design of CUSUM control charts for binomial counts. Journal of Applied Statistics 20:279–86. doi:10.1080/02664769300000045.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D. M. 1981. A CUSUM for scale parameters. Journal of Quality Technology 13 (4):228–31. doi:10.1080/00224065.1981.11978762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoo, M. B. C. 2004. Design of runs rules schemes. Quality Engineering 16:27–43. doi:10.1081/QEN-120020769.
   Google Scholar
• Knoth, S. 2006. Computation of the ARL for CUSUM-S2 schemes. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 51:499–512. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2005.09.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, J. M. 1976. The design and use of cumulative sum quality control schemes. Journal of Quality Technology 8 (1):1–12. doi:10.1080/00224065.1976.11980706.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C. 2009. Introduction to Statistical Quality Control (6th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Page, E. S. 1954. Continuous inspection schemes. Biometrika 41:100–14. doi:10.1093/biomet/41.1-2.100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, E. S. 1961. Cumulative sum control charts. Technometries 3 (1):1–9. doi:10.1080/00401706.1961.10489922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, E. S. 1963. Controlling the standard deviation by CUSUM and warning lines. Technometrics 5:307–15. doi:10.1080/00401706.1963.10490100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poetrodjojo, S., M. A. Abdollahian, and N. C. Debnath. 2002. Optimal CUSUM Schemes for monitoring variability. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences 32 (1):1–15 doi:10.1155/S0161171202202239.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu, P. 2014. Introduction to Statistical Process Control. London, New York: Taylor & Francis Group, CRC press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, J. G., and J. Juan. 1989. A contour nomogram for designing cusum charts for variance (Report # 33). University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center for Quality and Productivity Improvement.
   Google Scholar
• Riaz, M., N. Abbas, and R. J. M. M. Does. 2011. Improving the Performance of CUSUM Charts. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 27:415–24. doi:10.1002/qre.1124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafqat, A., J. Hussain, A. D. Al-Nasser, and M. Aslam. 2018. Attribute control chart for some popular distributions. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods 47 (8):1978–88. doi:10.1080/03610926.2017.1335414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava, M. 1997. Cusum procedure for monitoring variability. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods 26 (12):2905–26. doi:10.1080/03610929708832085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodall, W. H. 1986. The design of CUSUM quality control charts. Journal of Quality Technology 18:99–102. doi:10.1080/00224065.1986.11978994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodall, W. H., and B. M. Adams. 1993. The statistical design of CUSUM Charts. Quality Engineering 5 (4):559–70. doi:10.1080/08982119308918998.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, A. B., D. K. J. Lin, and C. Venkataramani. 2004. Unified CUSUM chart for monitoring process mean and variability. Quality Technology and Quantitative Management 1 (1):65–86. doi:10.1080/16843703.2004.11673065.
   Google Scholar