Reporting Bayes factors or probabilities to decision makers of unknown loss functions

References

• Bandyopadhyay, P., G. Brittan, and M. Taper. 2016. Belief, evidence, and uncertainty: Problems of epistemic inference. Springer Briefs in Philosophy. Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, C., and K. Slooten. 2016. The LR does not exist. Science and Justice 56 (5):388–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J. 1985. Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bickel, D. R. 2012a. Controlling the degree of caution in statistical inference with the Bayesian and frequentist approaches as opposite extremes. Electronic Journal of Statistics 6:686–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickel, D. R. 2012b. Game-theoretic probability combination with applications to resolving conflicts between statistical methods. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 53:880–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickel, D. R. 2013. Minimax-optimal strength of statistical evidence for a composite alternative hypothesis. International Statistical Review 81:188–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blume, J. D. 2011. Likelihood and its evidential framework. In Philosophy of statistics, ed. P. S. Bandyopadhyay and M.R. Forster, 493–512. Amsterdam: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Csiszár, I. 1991. Why least squares and maximum entropy? An axiomatic approach to inference for linear inverse problems. Annals of Statistics 19:2032–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran, J. 2016. Admitting to uncertainty in the LR. Science and Justice 56 (5):380–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron, B. 2008. Simultaneous inference: When should hypothesis testing problems be combined? Annals of Applied Statistics 2197–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elga, A. 2010. Subjective probabilities should be sharp. Philosophers Imprint 10 (5):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, M. 2015. Measuring statistical evidence using relative belief Chapman & Hall/CRC Monographs on Statistics & Applied Probability. New York: CRC Press
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. A. 1973 Statistical methods and scientific inference New York Hafner Press
   Google Scholar
• Genest, C., K. Mcconway, and M. Schervish. 1986. Characterization of externally Bayesian pooling operators. Annals of Statistics 14 (2):487–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., P. Todd, the ABC Research Group. 2000. Simple heuristics that make us smart Evolution and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Grünwald, P., A. P. Dawid. 2004. Game theory, maximum entropy, minimum discrepancy and robust Bayesian decision theory. Annals of Statistics 32:1367–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, T. P. 1995. A statistical derivation of the significant-digit law. Statistical Science 10 (4):354–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, S. E., Z. Baskurt, and L. J. Strug. 2011. Using parametric multipoint lods and mods for linkage analysis requires a shift in statistical thinking. Human Heredity. 72 (4):264–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Csiszár J. Körner 2011 Information theory: Coding theorems for discrete memoryless systems Cambridge Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Jaynes, E. 2003 Probability theory: The logic of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Kass, R. E., A. E. Raftery. 1995. Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90:773–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kossovsky, A. 2014. Benford’s law: Theory, the general law of relative quantities, and forensic fraud detection applications. Series in Computer Vision. World Scientific Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• McConway, K. J. 1981. Marginalization and linear opinion pools. Journal of the American Statistical Association 76:410–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merhav, N., and M. Feder. 1998. Universal prediction. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 44 (6):2124–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordgaard, A. 2016. Comment on ‘dismissal of the illusion of uncertainty on the assessment of a likelihood ratio’ by Taroni F., Bozza S., Biederman A. and Aitken C. Law. Probability and Risk 15 (1):17–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ommen, D., C. Saunders, and C. Neumann. 2016. An argument against presenting interval quantifications as a surrogate for the value of evidence. Science and Justice 56 (5):383–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietronero, L., E. Tosatti, V. Tosatti, and A. Vespignani. 2001. Explaining the uneven distribution of numbers in nature: The laws of benford and zipf. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 293 (1):297–304.
   Google Scholar
• Rohde, C. 2014. Introductory statistical inference with the likelihood function. Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ryabko, B. 1979. Encoding of a source with unknown but ordered probabilities. Prob. Pered. Inform. 15:71–77.
   Google Scholar
• Ryabko, B. 1981. Comments on ‘A source matching approach to finding minimax codes’ by Davisson, L. D. and Leon-Garcia, A. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 27:780–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoye, J. 2012. Minimax regret treatment choice with covariates or with limited validity of experiments. Journal of Econometrics 166 (1):138–156, annals Issue on “Identification and Decisions”, in Honor of Chuck Manski’s 60th Birthday.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taroni, F., S. Bozza, A. Biedermann, and C. Aitken. 2016. Dismissal of the illusion of uncertainty in the assessment of a likelihood ratio. Law, Probability and Risk 15 (1):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, D., T. Hicks, and C. Champod. 2016. Using sensitivity analyses in Bayesian networks to highlight the impact of data paucity and direct future analyses: A contribution to the debate on measuring and reporting the precision of likelihood ratios. Science and Justice 56 (5):402–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topsøe, F., 1979. Information theoretical optimization techniques. Kybernetika 15 (1):8–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troffaes, M., and G. de Cooman. 2014. Lower previsions. New York Wiley: Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Vieland, V. J., and S.-C. Seok. 2016. Statistical evidence measured on a properly calibrated scale for multinomial hypothesis comparisons. Entropy 18 (4):114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walley, P. 2015. BI statistical methods, vol. 1: Foundations. Prescience Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wellcome, Trust Case Control Consortium. 2007. Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature 447:661–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P. M. 1980. Bayesian conditionalisation and the principle of minimum information. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 31:131–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, S., L. McKenna, S. McDermott, G. O’Donell, A. Barrett, B. Rasmusson, A. Nordgaard, C. Berger, M. Sjerps, and J. Lucena-Molina, et al. 2015. ENFSI guideline for evaluative reporting in forensic science. European Network of Forensic Science Institutes.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., B. Zhang. 2013. A likelihood paradigm for clinical trials (with discussion). Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice 7:157–203.
   Google Scholar