Penalized proportion estimation for non parametric mixture of regressions

References

• Bishop, C. M. 2006. Pattern recognition and machine learning. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, M. 1999. Structure learning in conditional probability models via an entropic prior and parameter extinction. Neural Computation 11 (5):1155–82. doi: 10.1162/089976699300016395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corduneanu, A., and C. M. Bishop. 2001. Variational bayesian model selection for mixture distributions. In Artificial intelligence and Statistics, Vol. 2001, 27–34. Waltham, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Dacunha-Castelle, D., and E. Gassiat. 1997. Testing in locally conic models, and application to mixture models. ESAIM: Probability and Statistics 1:285–317. doi: 10.1051/ps:1997111.
   Google Scholar
• Dacunha-Castelle, D., and E. Gassiat. 1999. Testing the order of a model using locally conic parametrization: population mixtures and stationary arma processes. The Annals of Statistics 27 (4):1178–1209. doi: 10.1214/aos/1017938921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, J., and R. Li. 2001. Variable selection via non concave penalized likelihood and its oracle properties. Journal of the American Statistical Association 96 (456):1348–60. doi: 10.1198/016214501753382273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueiredo, M. A., and A. K. Jain. 2002. Unsupervised learning of finite mixture models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 24 (3):381–96. doi: 10.1109/34.990138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frühwirth-Schnatter, S. 2006. Finite mixture and Markov switching models. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Goldfeld, S. M., and R. E. Quandt. 1973. A markov model for switching regressions. Journal of Econometrics 1 (1):3–15. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(73)90002-X.
   Google Scholar
• Hennig, C. 2000. Identifiablity of models for clusterwise linear regression. Journal of Classification 17 (2):273–96. doi: 10.1007/s003570000022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, M., and W. Yao. 2012. Mixture of regression models with varying mixing proportions: a semiparametric approach. Journal of the American Statistical Association 107 (498):711–24. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2012.682541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, M., R. Li, and S. Wang. 2013. Non parametric mixture of regression models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 108 (503):929–41. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2013.772897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, T., H. Peng, and K. Zhang. 2017. Model selection for gaussian mixture models. Statistica Sinica. 27 (1):147–69. doi: 10.5705/ss.2014.105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keribin, C. 2000. Consistent estimation of the order of mixture models. Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A 62:49–66.
   Google Scholar
• Law, M. H., M. A. Figueiredo, and A. K. Jain. 2002. Feature saliency in unsupervised learning. Tech. Rep., Dept. Computer Science and Eng., Michigan State Univ. Available at http://www.cse.msu.edu/lawhiu/papers/TR02.ps.gz.
   Google Scholar
• Leroux, B. G. 1992. Maximum-likelihood estimation for hidden markov models. Stochastic Processes and their Applications 40 (1):127–43. doi: 10.1016/0304-4149(92)90141-C.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, B. G. 1995. Mixture models: theory, geometry and applications. Paper presented at JSTOR, NSF-CBMS Regional Conference Series in Probability and Statistics pp i–163.
   Google Scholar
• McLachlan, G., and D. Peel. 2004. Finite mixture models. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ormoneit, D., and V. Tresp. 1998. Averaging, maximum penalized likelihood and bayesian estimation for improving gaussian mixture probability density estimates. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 9 (4):639–50. doi: 10.1109/72.701177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roeder, K., and L. Wasserman. 1997. Practical bayesian density estimation using mixtures of normals. Journal of the American Statistical Association 92 (439):894–902. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1997.10474044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titterington, D., A. Smith, U. Makov et al. 1985. Statistical analysis of finite mixture distributions, vol. 38. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Young, D. S., and D. R. Hunter. 2010. Mixtures of regressions with predictor-dependent mixing proportions. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 54 (10):2253–66. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2010.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, C.-H. 2010. Nearly unbiased variable selection under minimax concave penalty. The Annals of statistics 38 (2):894–42. doi: 10.1214/09-AOS729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zivkovic, Z., and F. van der Heijden. 2004. Recursive unsupervised learning of finite mixture models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 26 (5):651–56. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2004.1273970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar