A simple root selection method for univariate finite normal mixture models

References

• Anderson, T. W., and D. A. Darling. 1952. Asymptotic theory of certain “goodness of fit” criteria based on stochastic processes. The annals of mathematical statistics 23 (2):193–12.
   Google Scholar
• Benaglia, T., C. Didier, H. David, and Y. Derek. 2009. Mixtools: An R package for analyzing finite mixture models. Journal of Statistical Software 32 (6):1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benaglia, T., C. Didier, H. David, and Y. Derek. 2009. Mixtools: An R package for analyzing finite mixture models. Journal of Statistical Software 32 (6):1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhning, D. 1999. Computer-assisted analysis of mixtures and applications. Chapman and Hall: CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Celeux, G., H. Merrilee, and P. R. Christian. 2000. Computational and inferential difficulties with mixture posterior distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 95 (451):957–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., and J. D. Kalbfleisch. 1996. Penalized minimum-distance estimates in finite mixture models. Canadian Journal of Statistics 24 (2):167–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., and T. Xianming. 2009. Inference for multivariate normal mixtures. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 100 (7):1367–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciuperca, G., R. Andrea, and I. Jérôme. 2003. Penalized maximum likelihood estimator for normal mixtures. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 30 (1):45–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, N. E. 1969. Estimating the components of a mixture of normal distributions. Biometrika 56 (3):463–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, J. E. 1981. Algorithms for nonlinear fitting. Nonlinear optimization 1981 (Proceeding of the NATO Advanced Research Institute), Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• García-Escudero, L. A., A. Gordaliza, C. Matrán. and A. Mayo-Iscar. 2008. A general trimming approach to robust cluster analysis. The Annals of Statistics 1324–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Escudero, L. A., A. Gordaliza, C. Matrán, and A. Mayo-Iscar. 2015. Avoiding spurious local maximizers in mixture modeling. Statistics and Computing 25 (3):619–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gondek, D., and H. Thomas. 2007. Non-redundant data clustering. Knowledge and Information Systems 12 (1):1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Härdle, W. 1991. Smoothing techniques: With implementation in S. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hathaway, R. J. 1985. A constrained formulation of maximum-likelihood estimation for normal mixture distributions. The Annals of Statistics 13 (2):795–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingrassia, S. 2004. A likelihood-based constrained algorithm for multivariate normal mixture models. Statistical Methods and Applications 13 (2): 151–166.
   Google Scholar
• Jain, A. K., M. N. Murty, and P. J. Flynn. 1999. Data clustering: A review. ACM computing surveys (CSUR) 31 (3): 264–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. F., C. E. Priebe, and D. J. Marchette. 2001. Consistent estimation of mixture complexity. Annals of Statistics 1281–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer, J., and W. Jacob. 1956. Consistency of the maximum likelihood estimator in the presence of infinitely many incidental parameters. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 887–906.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D., and S. Byungtae. 2014. Assessment of the number of components in Gaussian mixture models in the presence of multiple local maximizers. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 125: 100–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuiper, N. H. 1960. Tests concerning random points on a circle. Indagationes Mathematicae (Proceedings), Vol. 63, 38–47. Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, B. G. 1995. Mixture models: Theory, geometry and applications. In NSF-CBMS regional conference series in probability and statistics, 1–163. Institute of Mathematical Statistics and the American Statistical Association.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, S., W. Huaiqing, and Q. M. William. 2015. Understanding and addressing the unbounded “likelihood” problem. The American Statistician 69 (3):191–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLachlan, G., and P. David. 2000. Finite mixture models. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• McLachlan, G. J., and E. B. Kaye. 1988. Mixture models. Inference and applications to clustering. Statistics: Textbooks and monographs, Vol. 1. New York: Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Melnykov, V., R. Maitra, et al. 2010. Finite mixture models and model-based clustering. Statistics Surveys 4:80–116.
   Google Scholar
• Mengersen, K. 2009. Bayesian Analysis of Mixtures: Foundations and Applications. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Pollard, D., et al. 1981. Strong consistency of k-means clustering. The Annals of Statistics 9 (1):135–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, S., and G. L. Bruce. 2008. Model selection in high dimensions: a quadratic-risk-based approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 70 (1):95–118.
   Google Scholar
• Ritter, G. 2014. Robust cluster analysis and variable selection. New York: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rocci, R., G. Stefano Antonio, and D. M. Roberto. 2017. A data driven equivariant approach to constrained Gaussian mixture modeling. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, B., and K. Daeyoung. 2012. Root selection in normal mixture models. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 56 (8):2454–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, M. 2000. Dealing with label switching in mixture models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 62 (4):795–809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, M. A. 1979. The Anderson–Darling Statistic. Tech. rept. DTIC Document.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, M. A. 1992. An Appreciation of Kolmogorov’s 1933 Paper. Tech. rept. DTIC Document.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, G. S. 1961. Goodness-of-fit tests on a circle. Biometrika 48 (1/2):109–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo, M-J. and T.N. Sriram. 2006. Robust estimation of mixture complexity. Journal of the American Statistical Association 101 (476):1475–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward, W. A., W. C. Parr, W. R. Schucany, and H, Lindsey. 1984. A comparison of minimum distance and maximum likelihood estimation of a mixture proportion. Journal of the American Statistical Association 79 (387):590–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakowitz, S. J., and J. D. Spragins. 1968. On the identifiability of finite mixtures. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 209–14.
   Google Scholar
• Yao, W. 2010. A profile likelihood method for normal mixture with unequal variance. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 40 (7):2089–98.
   Google Scholar
• Yao, W. 2012. Bayesian mixture labeling and clustering. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods 41:403–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, W. 2015. Label switching and its solutions for frequentist mixture models. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 85 (5):1000–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, W., and B. G. Lindsay. 2009. Bayesian mixture labeling by highest posterior density. Journal of the American Statistical Association 104 (486):758–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar