A New Perspective in Functional EIV Linear Models: Part II

References

• Al-Sharadqah, A. 2017. A new perspective in functional EIV linear model: Part I. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods 46 (14):7039–62. doi:10.1080/03610926.2016.1143009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Sharadqah, A., and N. Chernov. 2011. Statistical analysis of curve fitting methods in errors-in-variables models. Theory of Probability and Mathematical Statistics 84:4–17. doi:10.1090/S0094-9000-2012-00860-0.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T. W. 1976. Estimation of linear functional relationships: Approximate distributions and connections with simultaneous equations in econometrics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 38 (1):1–36. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1976.tb01562.x.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T. W., and T. Sawa. 1982. Exact and approximate distributions of the maximum likelihood estimator of a slope coefficient. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 44 (1):52–62. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1982.tb01187.x.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, M., and S. Se. 2002. Ground plane estimation, error analysis and applications. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 39 (2):59–71. doi:10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00175-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, R., D. Ruppert, and L. Stefansky. 2006. Measurement error in nonlinear models. 2nd ed. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, C., and A. Kukush. 2006. Non-existence of the first moment of the adjusted least squares estimator in multivariate errors-in-variables model. Metrika 64 (1):41–6. doi:10.1007/s00184-006-0029-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernov, N., and C. Lesort. 2004. Statistical efficiency of curve fitting algorithms. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 47 (4):713–28. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2003.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, C. L., and J. W. Van Ness. 1999. Statistical regression with measurement error. London, UK: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, O. 2005. Obtaining a best fitting plane through 3D georeferenced data. Journal of Structural Geology 27 (5):855–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, W. A. 1987. Measurement error models. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gallo, O., R. Manduchi, and A. Rafii. 2011. CC-RANSAC: Fitting planes in the presence of multiple surfaces in range data. Pattern Recognition Letters 32 (3):403–10. doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2010.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillard, J. W. 2010. An overview of linear structural models. REVSTAT Statistical Journal 8 (1):57–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanatani, K. 1996. Statistical optimization for geometric computation: Theory and practice. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science
   Google Scholar
• Kanatani, K. 1998. Cramer-Rao lower bounds for curve fitting. Graphical Models and Image Processing 60 (2):93–9. doi:10.1006/gmip.1998.0466.
   Google Scholar
• Hirayu, H., C. Wang, and H. Tanahashi. 2001. Comparison of local plane fitting methods for range data. Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001, Kauai.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, S., and S. Banerjee. 2004. Remote surface mapping using orthophotos and geologic maps draped over digital elevation models: Application to the Sheep Mountain anticline, Wyoming. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 88 (9):1227–37. doi:10.1306/02170403091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patriota, A., A. Lemonte, and H. Bolfarine. 2011. Improved maximum likelihood estimators in a heteroskedastic errors-in-variables model. Statistical Papers 88:455–67. doi:10.1007/s00362-009-0243-7.
   Google Scholar
• West, G., A. Nurunnabi, and A. Belton. 2012. Diagnostic-robust statistical analysis for local surface fitting in 3D point cloud data. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. XXII ISPRS Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Zhong, R., J. Wei, W. Su, and Y. Chen. 2013. A method for extracting trees from vehicle-borne laser scanning data. Mathematical and Computer Modeling 58 (3–4):733–42. doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2012.12.038.
   Google Scholar