Semiparametric mean model with non linear time effect of the covariate for clustered recurrent events with terminal events

References

• Andersen, P. K., and R. D. Gill. 1982. Cox’s regression model for counting processes: A large sample study. The Annals of Statistics 10 (4):1100–20. doi:10.1214/aos/1176345976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byar, D. P. 1980. The Veterans administration study of chemoprophylaxis for recurrent stage I bladder tumors: Comparisons of placebo, pyridoxine and topical thiotepa. In Bladder tumors and other topics in urological oncology, ed. M. Pavone-Macaluso, P. H. Smith, F. Edsmyr, 363–70. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, X. M., F. Y. Kang, J. Zhou, and X. Wang. 2015. A general additive-multiplicative rates model for recurrent and terminal events. Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica, English Series 31 (4):1115–30. doi:10.1007/s10255-015-0540-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, J. J., L. Q. Sun, and Z. H. Yang. 2009. A general additive-multiplicative rates model for recurrent event data. Science in China Series A: Mathematics 52 (10):2257–65. doi:10.1007/s11425-009-0095-6.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, T. R., and D. P. Harrington. 1991. Counting Processes and Survival Analysis. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, D., and D. Y. Lin. 2002. Marginal regression models for recurrent and terminal events. Statist. Sinica 12:663–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, M., L. Sun, Y. Liu, and J. Zhu. 2018. Joint analysis of recurrent event data with additive–multiplicative hazards model for the terminal event time. Metrika 81 (5):523. doi:10.1007/s00184-018-0654-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, S., F. Wang, and L. Sun. 2013. A semiparametric additive rates model for clustered recurrent event data. Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica, English Series 29 (1):55–62. doi:10.1007/s10255-011-0093-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C. Y., and M. C. Wang. 2004. Joint modeling and estimation of recurrent event processes and failure time. Journal of the American Statistical Association 99 (468):1153–65. doi:10.1198/016214504000001033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalbfleisch, J. D., and R. L. Prentice. 2002. The statistical analysis of failure time data. 2nd edn. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, K. Y., and S. L. Zeger. 1986. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73 (1):13–22. doi:10.2307/2336267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, D. Y., L. J. Wei, L. Yang, and Z. Ying. 2000. Semiparametric regression for the mean and rate function of recurrent events. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 69:711–30. doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00259.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, D., D. E. Schaubel, and J. D. Kalbfleisch. 2012. Computationally efficient marginal models for clustered recurrent event data. Biometrics 68 (2):637–47. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01676.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, Q., and D.E. Schaubel. 2009. Flexible estimation of differences in treatment-specific recurrent event means in the presence of a terminating event. Biometrics 65 (3):753–61. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01157.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard, D. 1990. Empirical processes: theory and applications. Hayward, CA: Institute of Mathematical Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Qu, L., L. Sun, and L. Liu. 2017. Joint modeling of recurrent and terminal events using additive models. Statistics and Its Interface 10 (4):699–710. doi:10.4310/SII.2017.v10.n4.a12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudin, W. B. 1976. Principles of mathematical analysis. 3rd ed. New Yark: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Schaubel, D., and J. Cai. 2005. Analysis of clustered recurrent event data with application to hospitalization rates among renal failure patients. Biostatistics 6 (3):404–19. doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxi018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, L., and F. Kang. 2013. An additive-multiplicative rates model for recurrent event data with informative terminal event. Lifetime Data Analysis 19 (1):117–37. doi:10.1007/s10985-012-9228-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Vaart, A. W., and J. A. Wellner. Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M. C., J. Qin, and C. T. Chiang. 2001. Analyzing recurrent event data with informative censoring. Journal of the American Statistical Association 96 (455):1057–65. doi:10.1198/016214501753209031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, F., and S. He. 2014. Accelerated failure time models for clustered recurrent event data. Journal of Huazhong Normal University (Nature Science) 48:468–73.
   Google Scholar
• Ye, Y., J.D. Kalbfleisch, and D. E. Schaubel. 2007. Semiparametric analysis of correlated recurrent and terminal events. Biometrics 63 (1):78–87. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00677.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, D., and D. Y. Lin. 2006. Efficient estimation of semiparametric transformation models with random effects for recurrent events. Biometrika 93 (3):627–40. doi:10.1093/biomet/93.3.627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, D., and D. Y. Lin. 2009. Semiparametric transformation models with random effects for joint analysis of recurrent and terminal events. Biometrics 65 (3):746–52. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01126.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, D., and J. Cai. 2010. Semiparametric additive rate model for recurrent events with informative terminal event. Biometrika 97 (3):699–712. doi:10.1093/biomet/asq039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, H., J. Zhou, and L. Q. Sun. 2013. A marginal additive rates model for recurrent event data with a terminal event. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods 42 (14):2567–83. doi:10.1080/03610926.2011.626548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X. Q., J. Zhou, and L. Q. Sun. 2011. Semiparametric transformation models with time-varying coefficients for recurrent and terminal events. Biometrics 67 (2):404–14. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01458.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar