References
- Abad, P., and S. Benito. 2013. A detailed comparison of value at risk estimates. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 94:258–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2012.05.011.
- Balakrishnan, N. 1992. Handbook of the logistic distribution. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
- Bali, T. G. 2003. The generalized extreme value distribution. Economics Letters 79 (3):423–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00035-1.
- Bali, T., and P. Theodossiou. 2008. Risk measurement performance of alternative distribution functions. Journal of Risk & Insurance 75 (2):411–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6975.2008.00266.x.
- Christoffersen, P. F. 1998. Evaluating interval forecasts. International Economic Review 39 (4):841–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2527341.
- Cummins, D. J., G. Dionne, J. B. McDonald, and B. M. Pritchett. 1990. Applications of the GB2 family of distributions in modelling insurance loss processes. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 9 (4):257–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6687(90)90003-V.
- Danielsson, J., B. N. Jorgensen, M. Sarma, and C. G. de Vries. 2006. Comparing downside risk measures for heavy tailed distributions. Economics Letters 92 (2):202–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2006.02.004.
- Feunou, B., M. R. Jahan-Parvar, and R. Tédongap. 2013. Modelling market downside volatility. Review of Finance 17 (1):443–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfr024.
- Johnson, N. L. 1949. Systems of frequency curves generated by methods of translation. Biometrika 36 (1–2):149–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2332539.
- Johnson, N. L., S. Kotz, and N. Balakrishnan. 1995. Continuous univariate distributions, vol. 2, 2nd ed., New York: John Wiley & Sons.
- Jorion, P. 2001. Value at risk, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Kerman, S. C., and J. B. McDonald. 2015. Skewness-kurtosis bounds for EGB1, EGB2, and special cases. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods 44 (18):3857–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2013.844255.
- Kupiec, P. H. 1995. Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models. The Journal of Derivatives 3 (2):73–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.3905/jod.1995.407942.
- McDonald, J. B., and Y. J. Xu. 1995. A generalization of the beta distribution with applications. Journal of Econometrics 66 (1–2):133–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01680-X.
- Nadarajah, S., and S. Chan. 2016. Estimation methods for value at risk, Ch. 12 in extreme events. In Finance: a handbook of extreme value theory and its applications, eds. F. Longin, 283–356. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
- Nadarajah, S., S. Chan, and E. Afuecheta. 2017. Tabulations for value at risk and expected shortfall. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods 46 (12):5956– 84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2015.1116572.
- Nadarajah, S., B. Zhang, and S. Chan. 2014. Estimation methods for expected shortfall. Quantitative Finance 14 (2):271–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2013.816767.
- Nieto, M. R., and E. Ruiz. 2016. Review, frontiers in VaR forecasting and backtesting. International Journal of Forecasting 32 (2):475–501. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2015.08.003.
- Theodossiou, P. 1998. Financial data and the skewed generalized t distribution. Management Science 44 (12):1650–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.12.1650.
- Theodossiou, P. 2019. Skewed type III generalized logistic distribution. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods 48 (23):5809– 19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2018.1522348.
- Zhang, Y., J. Chu, S. Chan, and B. Chan. 2019. The generalised hyperbolic distribution and its subclass in the analysis of a new era of cryptocurrencies: ethereum and its financial risk. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 526:120900. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.04.136.
- Zhang, Y., and S. Nadarajah. 2018. A review of backtesting for value at risk. Communications in Statistics– Theory and Methods 47 (15):3616–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2017.1361984.